Globalising the History of Capital: Ways Forward
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Jairus Banaji in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Anievas and Nişancıoğlu’s attempt to shift the terms of the debate about early modern capitalism by a major widening of its perspectives is a welcome move. Accepting this, the paper suggests that their argument can be more forcefully made if the theoretical residues of earlier traditions of Marxist historical explanation are purged from the way they expound that argument. The most ambivalent of these relates to their continued use of the idea of a ‘coexistence of modes of production’. This permeates the confused way they present Atlantic slavery. A second, comparable source of confusion concerns their description of the relationship between merchant capital and the absolutist state. The alliance between the modern state and mercantile capital is radically misrecognised thanks to an uncritical espousal of Anderson’s view of absolutism. The paper suggests that Anievas and Nişancıoğlu might have written a stronger book had they reconceptualised the economic history of capitalism by allowing for a whole epoch dominated by powerful groups of merchant capitalists. In conclusion, I argue (pace Marx) that the commercial capital of the later middle ages/early modern period was the first form in which production began to be subordinated to capital.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abulafia, David 2014, The Great Sea: A Human History of the Mediterranean, London: Penguin Books.
-
Al-Iṣṭakhrî, Abû Ishâq 1870, Kitâb al-masâlik wa l-mamâlik, edited by M.J. De Goeje, Leiden: Brill.
-
Anievas, Alexander and Kerem Nişancıoğlu 2015, How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism, London: Pluto Press.
-
Banaji, Jairus 2009, ‘Reconstructing Historical Materialism: Some Key Issues’, available at: <https://www.academia.edu/24199321/Reconstructing_Historical_Materialism_Some_Key_Issues>.
-
Banaji, Jairus 2016, ‘Merchant Capitalism, Peasant Households and Industrial Accumulation: Integration of a Model’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 16, 3: 410–431.
-
Barber, John 1981, Soviet Historians in Crisis, 1928–1932, London: Macmillan Press.
-
Barbour, Violet 1950, Capitalism in Amsterdam in the Seventeenth Century, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
-
Beckert, Sven 2014, Empire of Cotton: A New History of Global Capitalism, London: Allen Lane.
-
Blackburn, Robin 1997, The Making of New World Slavery: From the Baroque to the Modern, 1492–1800, London: Verso.
-
Braudel, Fernand 1969, Écrits sur l’histoire, Paris: Flammarion.
-
Braudel, Fernand 1975, The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II, Volume 1, translated by Siân Reynolds, London: Fontana Press.
-
Braudel, Fernand 2002, Civilization and Capitalism 15th–18th Century, Volume 2, The Wheels of Commerce, translated by Siân Reynolds, London: Phoenix Press.
-
Brenner, Robert 1993, Merchants and Revolution: Commercial Change, Political Conflict, and London’s Overseas Traders, 1550–1653, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Cain, Peter J. and Antony Gerald Hopkins 2002, British Imperialism, 1688–2000, Second Edition, Harlow: Longman.
-
Cracco, Giorgio 1967, Società e stato nel medioevo Veneziano (secoli XII–XIV), Florence: Leo S. Olschki.
-
Darwin, John 2008, After Tamerlane: The Rise and Fall of Global Empires, 1400–2000, New York: Bloomsbury Press.
-
Devine, Thomas Martin 1975, The Tobacco Lords: A Study of the Tobacco Merchants of Glasgow and their Trading Activities c.1740–90, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
-
Dias, Manuel Nunes 1963, O Capitalismo monárquico português, 1415–1549. Contribuição para o estudo das origens do capitalismo moderno, two volumes, Coimbra: Faculdade de Letras da Universidade de Coimbra.
-
Dobb, Maurice 1967, Capitalism, Development and Planning, Bombay: Allied Publishers.
-
Drescher, Seymour 1977, Econocide: British Slavery in the Era of Abolition, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
-
Fieldhouse, D.K. 1994, Merchant Capital and Economic Decolonization: The United Africa Company 1929–1987, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Firro, Kais 1990, ‘Silk and Agrarian Changes in Lebanon, 1860–1914’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 22, 2: 151–169.
-
Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth and Eugene D. Genovese 1983, Fruits of Merchant Capital: Slavery and Bourgeois Property in the Rise and Expansion of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Furtado, Celso 1968, The Economic Growth of Brazil: A Survey from Colonial to Modern Times, Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Goubert, Pierre 1960, Beauvais et le Beauvaisis de 1600 à 1730. Contribution à l’histoire sociale de la France du XVIIe siècle, Paris: SEVPEN.
-
Greenberg, Michael 1951, British Trade and the Opening of China, 1800–42, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Grossmann, Henryk 1970, Das Akkumulations- und Zusammenbruchsgesetz des kapitalistischen Systems, Reprint, Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Neue Kritik.
-
Hartwell, Robert 1966, ‘Markets, Technology, and the Structure of Enterprise in the Development of the Eleventh-Century Chinese Iron and Steel Industry’, Journal of Economic History, 26, 1: 29–58.
-
Heers, Jacques 1961, Gênes au XVe siècle. Activité économique et problèmes sociaux, Paris: SEVPEN.
-
Hobson, John M. 2004, The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Hossain, Hameeda 1988, The Company Weavers of Bengal: The East India Company and the Organization of Textile Production in Bengal, 1750–1813, Delhi: Oxford University Press.
-
Ingham, Geoffrey K. 1984, Capitalism Divided? The City and Industry in British Social Development, London: Macmillan.
-
Jones, Geoffrey Gareth 2000, Merchants to Multinationals: British Trading Companies in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Kriedte, Peter 1983 [1980], Peasants, Landlords, and Merchant Capitalists: Europe and the World Economy, 1500–1800, New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Laclau, Ernesto 1971, ‘Feudalism and Capitalism in Latin America’, New Left Review, I, 67: 19–38.
-
Lefebvre, Georges 2005, The Coming of the French Revolution, translated by R.R. Palmer, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Lewis, Bernard 1966, The Arabs in History, Fourth Edition, London: Hutchinson.
-
Lo, Jung-pang 1970, ‘Chinese Shipping and East-West Trade from the Tenth to the Fourteenth Century’, in Sociétés et compagnies de commerce en Orient et dans l’Océan indien, edited by Michel Mollat, Paris: SEVPEN.
-
Lyashchenko, Peter Ivanovich 1998 [Russian original: 1927], ‘The Development of the Russian Grain Economy during the Crisis of 1880–1890’, in Commercialization and Agriculture in Late Imperial Russia: Essays on Russian Economic History, edited and translated by Hari Vasudevan, Calcutta: K.P. Bagchi & Co.
-
Marx, Karl 1973, Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft), translated by Martin Nicolaus, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Marx, Karl 1981, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume Three, translated by David Fernbach, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Mauro, Frédéric 1960, Le Portugal et l’Atlantique au XVIIe siècle (1570–1670). Étude économique, Paris: SEVPEN.
-
Mauro, Frédéric 1961, ‘Toward an “Intercontinental Model”: European Overseas Expansion between 1500 and 1800’, Economic History Review, 14, 1: 1–17.
-
Mehring, Franz 1975, Absolutism and Revolution in Germany, 1525–1848, translated by R. Archer, London: New Park Publications.
-
Mielants, Eric H. 2008, The Origins of Capitalism and the ‘Rise of the West’, Second Edition, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
-
Miller, Joseph C. 1988, Way of Death: Merchant Capitalism and the Angolan Slave Trade, 1730–1830, London: James Currey.
-
Minorsky, Vladimir 1943, ‘Tadhkirat al-mulûk’. A Manual of Ṣafavid Administration (circa 1137/1725). Persian Text in Facsimile (B.M. Or. 9496), London: Luzac & Co.
-
Molà, Luca 2000, The Silk Industry of Renaissance Venice, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
-
Mousnier, Roland 1967, Les XVIe et XVIIe siècles. La grande mutation intellectuelle de l’humanité, l’avènement de la science moderne et l’expansion de l’Europe, Fifth Edition, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
-
Ormrod, David 1984, ‘R.H. Tawney and the Origins of Capitalism’, History Workshop, 18: 138–159.
-
Ormrod, David 2003, The Rise of Commercial Empires: England and the Netherlands in the Age of Mercantilism, 1650–1770, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Pares, Richard 1960, Merchants and Planters, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Picon, Maurice 2008, ‘Production artisanale et manufacturière à l’époque romaine: À propos de L’Histoire brisée d’Aldo Schiavone’, in L’économie antique: Une économie de marché?, edited by Yves Roman and Julie Dalaison, Paris: Société des amis de Jacob Spon.
-
Pokrovsky, Mikhail Nikolaevich 1931, History of Russia, from the Earliest Times to the Rise of Commercial Capitalism, translated by Jesse Dunsmore Clarkson and Mary Rose Millie Griffiths, New York: International Publishers.
-
Pokrovsky, Mikhail Nikolaevich 1933, Brief History of Russia, Volume 1, translated by D.S. Mirsky, London: Martin Lawrence.
-
Polo, Marco 1958, The Travels of Marco Polo, translated by Ronald Latham, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Poni, Carlo 1976, ‘All’origine del sistema di fabbrica: tecnologia e organizzazione produttiva dei mulini da seta nell’Italia settentrionale (sec. XVII–XVIII)’, Rivista Storica Italiana, 88, 3: 444–497.
-
Rescher, Nicholas 1969, Many-Valued Logic, New York: McGraw-Hill.
-
Rodinson, Maxime 1966, Islam et capitalisme, Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
-
Roover, Raymond de 1968, ‘Labour Conditions in Florence around 1400: Theory, Policy and Reality’, in Florentine Studies: Politics and Society in Renaissance Florence, edited by Nicolai Rubinstein, London: Faber.
-
Sen, Tansen 2006, ‘The Formation of Chinese Maritime Networks to Southern Asia, 1200–1450’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 49, 4: 421–453.
-
Shenton, Robert W. 1986, The Development of Capitalism in Northern Nigeria, London: James Currey.
-
Thomaz, Luís Filipe 1989, ‘Le Portugal et l’Afrique au XVe siècle: les débuts de l’expansion’, Arquivos do Centro Cultural Português, 26: 161–256.
-
Tognetti, Sergio 2002, Un’industria di lusso al servizio del grande commercio, Florence: Leo S. Olschki.
-
Trevor-Roper, Hugh Redwald 1967, ‘The Reformation and Economic Change’, in Capitalism and the Reformation, edited by M.J. Kitch, London: Longman.
-
Tully, John 2011, The Devil’s Milk: A Social History of Rubber, New York: Monthly Review Press.
-
Vail, Leroy and Landeg White 1980, Capitalism and Colonialism in Mozambique: A Study of Quelimane District, London: Heinemann.
-
Verlinden, Charles 1966, Les Origines de la civilisation atlantique. De la Renaissance à l’Age des Lumières, Neuchâtel: Éditions de la Baconnière.
-
Williams, Eric Eustace 1994 [1944], Capitalism and Slavery, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
-
Wong, Roy Bin 1997, China Transformed: Historical Change and the Limits of European Experience, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
-
Wood, Ellen Meiksins 1999, The Origin of Capitalism, New York: Monthly Review Press.
-
Xu, Dixin and Wu Zhengming (eds.) 2000, Chinese Capitalism, 1522–1840, New York: St Martin’s Press.
-
Zahedieh, Nuala 2010, The Capital and the Colonies: London and the Atlantic Economy, 1660–1700, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1515 | 287 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 528 | 31 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 634 | 68 | 6 |
Globalising the History of Capital: Ways Forward
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Jairus Banaji in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Anievas and Nişancıoğlu’s attempt to shift the terms of the debate about early modern capitalism by a major widening of its perspectives is a welcome move. Accepting this, the paper suggests that their argument can be more forcefully made if the theoretical residues of earlier traditions of Marxist historical explanation are purged from the way they expound that argument. The most ambivalent of these relates to their continued use of the idea of a ‘coexistence of modes of production’. This permeates the confused way they present Atlantic slavery. A second, comparable source of confusion concerns their description of the relationship between merchant capital and the absolutist state. The alliance between the modern state and mercantile capital is radically misrecognised thanks to an uncritical espousal of Anderson’s view of absolutism. The paper suggests that Anievas and Nişancıoğlu might have written a stronger book had they reconceptualised the economic history of capitalism by allowing for a whole epoch dominated by powerful groups of merchant capitalists. In conclusion, I argue (pace Marx) that the commercial capital of the later middle ages/early modern period was the first form in which production began to be subordinated to capital.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1515 | 287 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 528 | 31 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 634 | 68 | 6 |
