Our reply focuses on three key themes raised in the symposium. First, we discuss an enduring issue in Marxist International Relations: ‘the problematic of the international’ and the problems of methodological internalism. We examine how our interlocutors have responded to this problematic and why we consider these responses insufficient. Specifically, we suggest that the source of our disagreement is grounded in two divergent understandings of the problem of internalism itself. We then reassert the value of our chosen response to the problematic – uneven and combined development (UCD). Second, we respond to the criticism that our extension of UCD as a ‘transmodal’ general abstraction is problematic by further explicating the significance and role of general abstractions in Marxist theory – a point yet addressed by our critics. Finally, we return to the fundamental question at the core of the transition debate: what is capitalism and how do we theorise it?
AnievasAlexander and KeremNişancıoğlu2013‘What’s at Stake in the Transition Debate? Rethinking the Origins of Capitalism and the “Rise of the West”’Millennium: Journal of International Studies421: 78–102.
BrennerRobert P.2007‘Property and Progress: Where Adam Smith Went Wrong’ in Marxist History-writing for the Twenty-first Century edited by ChrisWickhamOxford: Oxford University Press/The British Academy.
CooperLuke2013‘Can Contingency Be “Internalized” into the Bounds of Theory? Critical Realism, the Philosophy of Internal Relations and the Solution of “Uneven and Combined Development”’Cambridge Review of International Affairs263: 573–597.
NişancıoğluKerem2016‘Combination as “Foreign Policy”: The Intersocietal Origins of the Ottoman Empire’ in Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée edited by AlexanderAnievas and KamranMatinLanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield International.
PerssonKarl Gunnar1991‘Labor Productivity in the Medieval Economy: The Case of Tuscany and the Low Countries’ in Land Labour and Livestock: Historical Studies in European Agricultural Productivity edited by B.M.S.Campbell and MarkOvertonManchester: Manchester University Press.
PerssonKarl Gunnar2014‘Markets and Coercion in Medieval Europe’ in The Cambridge History of Capitalism Volume 1. The Rise of Capitalism: From Ancient Origins to 1848 edited by LarryNeal and Jeffrey G.WilliamsonCambridge: Cambridge University Press.