The Transition Debate Today

A Review of The Origin of Capitalism in England, 1400–1600 by Spencer Dimmock

In: Historical Materialism
View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Sociology, University of Maribor, Slovenia

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€25.00$30.00

Abstract

Spencer Dimmock has produced a convincing restatement, defence and update of Robert Brenner’s influential work on the origin of capitalism in England. The book productively engages with many Marxist and non-Marxist critics of the so-called ‘Brenner Thesis’, and presents fresh secondary and primary evidence in favour of it. This review sketches the theoretical background of Brenner’s intervention, summarises Dimmock’s take on Brenner, and comments on a few notable contemporary critiques of Brenner’s general framework which are not explicitly engaged with by Dimmock.

  • Anievas, Alexander and Kerem Nişancıoğlu 2015, How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism, London: Pluto Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Banaji, Jairus 2011, Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation, Historical Materialism Book Series, Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Brenner, Robert and Christopher Isett 2002, ‘England’s Divergence from China’s Yangzi Delta: Property Relations, Microeconomics, and Patterns of Development’, The Journal of Asian Studies, 61, 2: 609662.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bryant, Joseph M. 2006, ‘The West and the Rest Revisited: Debating Capitalist Origins, European Colonialism, and the Advent of Modernity’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 31, 4: 403444.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Byres, Terence 2009, ‘The Landlord Class, Peasant Differentiation, Class Struggle and the Transition to Capitalism: England, France and Prussia Compared’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36, 1: 3354.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Davidson, Neil 2012, How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?, Chicago: Haymarket Books.

  • Dean, Darron, Mark Overton, Jane Whittle and Andrew Hann 2004, Production and Consumption in English Households, 1600–1750, Abingdon: Routledge.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dimmock, Spencer 2014, The Origin of Capitalism in England, 1400–1600, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.

  • Duchesne, Ricardo 20012002, ‘Between Sinocentrism and Eurocentrism: Debating Andre Gunder Frank’s ReORIENT: Global Economy in the Asian Age, Science & Society, 65, 4: 428463.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Duchesne, Ricardo 2004, ‘On the Rise of the West: Researching Kenneth Pomeranz’s Great Divergence’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 36, 1: 5281.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heller, Henry 2011, The Birth of Capitalism: A Twenty-First Century Perspective, London: Pluto Press.

  • Hobson, John M. 2004, The Eastern Origins of Western Civilisation, New York: Cambridge University Press.

  • Hobson, John M. 2011, ‘What’s at Stake in the Neo-Trotskyist Debate? Towards a Non-Eurocentric Historical Sociology of Uneven and Combined Development’, Millennium, 40, 1: 147166.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hobson, John M. 2012, The Eurocentric Conception of the World: Western International Theory, 1760–2010, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Huang, Philip C.C. 2002, ‘Development or Involution in Eighteenth-Century Britain and China? A Review of Kenneth Pomeranz’s The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy, The Journal of Asian Studies, 61, 2: 501538.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Isett, Christopher and Stephen Miller 2017, The Social History of Agriculture: From the Origins to the Current Crisis, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pomeranz, Kenneth 2000, The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pomeranz, Kenneth 2002, ‘Beyond the East-West Binary: Resituating Development Paths in the Eighteenth-Century World’, The Journal of Asian Studies, 61, 1: 539590.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Post, Charles 2012, The American Road to Capitalism: Studies in Class-Structure, Economic Development and Political Conflict, 1620–1877, Historical Materialism Book Series, Chicago: Haymarket Books.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Rigby, Steve H. 1995, English Society in the Later Middle Ages: Class, Status and Gender, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

  • Rioux, Sébastien 2013, ‘The Fiction of Economic Coercion: Political Marxism and the Separation of Theory and History’, Historical Materialism, 21, 4: 92128.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tansel, Cemal Burak 2015, ‘Deafening Silence? Marxism, International Historical Sociology and the Spectre of Eurocentrism’, European Journal of International Relations, 21, 1: 76100.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Teschke, Benno 2003, The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations, London: Verso.

  • Whittle, Jane 2000, The Development of Agrarian Capitalism: Land and Labour in Norfolk, 1440–1580, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Žmolek, Michael A. 2013, Rethinking the Industrial Revolution: Five Centuries of Transition from Agrarian to Industrial Capitalism in England, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1079 217 29
Full Text Views 240 43 5
PDF Downloads 95 31 3