This article is an introduction to the Symposium on Alexander Anievas and Kerem Nişancıoğlu’s How the West Came to Rule (2015). It summarises the main arguments of the book, as well as the critiques levied by the contributors to the Symposium.
AllinsonJamie C. and AlexanderAnievas2009‘The Uses and Misuses of Uneven and Combined Development: An Anatomy of a Concept’Cambridge Review of International Affairs221: 47–67<https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570802680132>.
AnievasAlexander2009‘Debating Uneven and Combined Development: Towards a Marxist Theory of “The International”?’Cambridge Review of International Affairs221: 7–8<https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570802692350>.
AnievasAlexander2013‘1914 in World Historical Perspective: The “Uneven” and “Combined” Origins of World War I’European Journal of International Relations194: 721–746<https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111427613>.
CallinicosAlex and JustinRosenberg2008‘Uneven and Combined Development: The Social-Relational Substratum of “The International”? An Exchange of Letters’Cambridge Review of International Affairs211: 77–112.
FitzsimonsAlejandro Luis and GuidoStarosta2017‘Global Capital, Uneven Development and National Difference: Critical Reflections on the Specificity of Accumulation in Latin America’Capital & Class421: 109–132<https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816817692126>.
RosenbergJustin2009‘Basic Problems in the Theory of Uneven and Combined Development: A Reply to the CRIA Forum’Cambridge Review of International Affairs221: 107–110<https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570802692392>.
RosenbergJustin2010‘Basic Problems in the Theory of Uneven and Combined Development. Part II: Unevenness and Political Multiplicity’Cambridge Review of International Affairs231: 165–189<https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570903524270>.
SchuesslerJennifer2013‘In History Departments, It’s Up with Capitalism’The New York Times6Aprilavailable at: <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/07/education/in-history-departments-its-up-with-capitalism.html>.