Michel Onfray’s L’Ordre libertaire is a passionate defence of Camus as a philosopher, and an attempt to co-opt him as a representative of Onfray’s own Nietzschean, hedonistic, libertarian, atheist beliefs. But the account is far from successful. Onfray’s presentation is highly repetitive, and though he promises us a ‘careful reading’, in fact his work contains many errors and misrepresentations. His vituperative attacks on Marxism in general, and on Sartre in particular, are often based on serious inaccuracies. His attempt to defend Camus en bloc makes him frequently insensitive to the complexities and contradictions of Camus’s thought, and in particular of his political stance. The treatment of Camus’s views on the Algerian War in particular, and the role of violence in history in general, is equally unsatisfactory.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Aronson, Ronald 2004, Camus and Sartre: The Story of a Friendship and the Quarrel that Ended It, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Birchall, Ian 1990, ‘The Labourism of Sisyphus: Albert Camus and Revolutionary Syndicalism’, Journal of European Studies, XX: 135–165.
Birchall, Ian 1994, ‘Camus contre Sartre: quarante ans plus tard’, in Albert Camus, les extrêmes et l’équilibre, edited by David H. Walker, Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Birchall, Ian 1998, ‘Prequel to the Heidegger Debate’, Radical Philosophy, 88: 19–27.
Broyelle, Claudie and Jacques Broyelle 1982, Les Illusions retrouvées: Sartre a toujours raison contre Camus, Paris: Bernard Grasset.
Camus, Albert 2008, Œuvres complètes, Tome 3: 1949–1956, edited by Raymond Gay-Crosier, Paris: La Pléiade.
Contat, Michel and Michel Rybalka 1970, Les Écrits de Sartre, Paris: Gallimard.
De Beauvoir, Simone 1960, La Force de l’âge, Paris: Gallimard.
Drif, Zohra 2013, Mémoires d’une combattante de l’ALN: Zone autonome d’Alger, Algiers: Éditions Chihab.
Evans, Martin 2012, Algeria: France’s Undeclared War, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Galster, Ingrid 2001, Le Théâtre de Jean-Paul Sartre devant ses premiers critiques: Tome I, Paris: L’Harmattan.
Gerassi, John 2011, Entretiens avec Sartre, Paris: Bernard Grasset.
Gras, Christian 1971, Alfred Rosmer (1877–1964) et le mouvement révolutionnaire international, Paris: François Maspero.
Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich 1978, Collected Works, Volume 46 (Index), Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Lyotard, Jean-François 1989, La Guerre des Algériens. Écrits 1956–1963, Paris: Galilée.
Lyotard, Jean-François and Pierre Vidal-Naquet 1989, ‘Parler encore de la guerre d’Algérie’, Libération, 9 November.
Martin, Andy 2013, The Boxer and the Goalkeeper: Sartre versus Camus, London: Simon and Schuster.
Marx, Karl and Frederick Engels 1986, Collected Works, Volume XXII, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Marx, Karl and Frederick Engels 1992, Collected Works, Volume XLVI, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice 1960, Signes, Paris: Gallimard.
Onfray, Michel 1997, Politique du rebelle: Traité de résistance et d’insoumission, Paris: Bernard Grasset.
Onfray, Michel 2005, Traité d’athéologie: physique de la métaphysique, Paris: Bernard Grasset.
Onfray, Michel 2009, La Religion du poignard: éloge de Charlotte Corday, Paris: Galilée.
Onfray, Michel 2011, ‘Le Siècle de Sartre’, Le Monde, 4 June.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1964, Situations V, Paris: Gallimard.
Todd, Olivier 1996, Albert Camus: Une Vie, Paris: Gallimard.
Wohl, Robert 1966, French Communism in the Making 1914–1924, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1353 | 245 | 15 |
Full Text Views | 105 | 10 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 140 | 18 | 0 |
Michel Onfray’s L’Ordre libertaire is a passionate defence of Camus as a philosopher, and an attempt to co-opt him as a representative of Onfray’s own Nietzschean, hedonistic, libertarian, atheist beliefs. But the account is far from successful. Onfray’s presentation is highly repetitive, and though he promises us a ‘careful reading’, in fact his work contains many errors and misrepresentations. His vituperative attacks on Marxism in general, and on Sartre in particular, are often based on serious inaccuracies. His attempt to defend Camus en bloc makes him frequently insensitive to the complexities and contradictions of Camus’s thought, and in particular of his political stance. The treatment of Camus’s views on the Algerian War in particular, and the role of violence in history in general, is equally unsatisfactory.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1353 | 245 | 15 |
Full Text Views | 105 | 10 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 140 | 18 | 0 |