Capitalist Outcomes, Ideal Types, Historical Realities

In: Historical Materialism
Neil Davidson School of Social and Political Science, University of Glasgow

Search for other papers by Neil Davidson in
Current site
Google Scholar
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



This article is a response to some of the criticisms made of How Revolutionary were the Bourgeois Revolutions? by Gerstenberger, Post and Riley. In particular, it focuses on two issues of definition – that of capitalism and the capitalist nation-state – which arise from the book’s ‘consequentialist’ claim that bourgeois revolutions are defined by a particular outcome: the establishment of nation-states dedicated to the accumulation of capital.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 707 101 9
Full Text Views 481 10 1
PDF Views & Downloads 493 36 4