Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Capitalist Outcomes, Ideal Types, Historical Realities
In: Historical MaterialismAbstract
This article is a response to some of the criticisms made of How Revolutionary were the Bourgeois Revolutions? by Gerstenberger, Post and Riley. In particular, it focuses on two issues of definition – that of capitalism and the capitalist nation-state – which arise from the book’s ‘consequentialist’ claim that bourgeois revolutions are defined by a particular outcome: the establishment of nation-states dedicated to the accumulation of capital.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ado, Anatoly 1990, ‘The Role of the French Revolution in the Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism’, Science and Society, 54, 3: 361–366.
-
Allen, Kieran 2004, Max Weber: A Critical Introduction, London: Pluto Press.
-
Althusser, Louis 1971 [1969], ‘Preface to Capital Volume One’, in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, translated by Ben Brewster, pp. 69–101, London: New Left Books.
-
Aminzade, Ronald 1984, ‘Reinterpreting Capitalist Industrialization: A Study of Nineteenth-Century France’, Social History, 9, 3: 329–350.
-
Anderson, Perry 1965, ‘Problems of Socialist Strategy’, in Towards Socialism, edited for New Left Review by Perry Anderson and Robin Blackburn, pp. 221–290, London: Fontana.
-
Anderson, Perry 1976–7, ‘The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci’, New Left Review, I, 100: 5–78.
-
Anderson, Perry 1984, ‘Modernity and Revolution’, New Left Review, I, 144: 96–113.
-
Anderson, Perry 1992a [1976], ‘The Notion of a Bourgeois Revolution’, in English Questions, pp. 105–118, London: Verso.
-
Anderson, Perry 1992b [1987], ‘The Figures of Descent’, in English Questions, pp. 121–192, London: Verso.
-
Anderson, Perry 2017, The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci, London: Verso.
-
Anievas, Alexander and Kerem Nişancıoğlu 2015, How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism, London: Pluto Press.
-
Arrighi, Giovanni 1994, The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power and the Origins of Our Times, London: Verso.
-
B-de, Monsieur 1790, Reflections on the Causes and Probable Consequences of the Late Revolution in France, With a View of the Ecclesiastical and Civil Constitution of Scotland, and of the Progress of Its Agriculture and Commerce, Dublin: William Porter.
-
Babeuf, Gracchus 1920 [1796], ‘Manifesto of the Equals’, in Revolution from 1789 to 1906, edited by Raymond Postgate, pp. 54–56, London: Grant Richards.
-
Banaji, Jairus 2010 [2003], ‘The Fictions of Free Labour: Contract, Coercion, and So-called Unfree Labour’, in Theory as History: Essays on Modes of Production and Exploitation, pp. 131–144, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Braudel, Fernand 1975 [1946], The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Phillip II, Volume 1, translated by Siân Reynolds, London: Fontana.
-
Brenner, Robert 1989, ‘Bourgeois Revolution and Transition to Capitalism’, in The First Modern Society: Essays in English History in Honour of Lawrence Stone, edited by A.L. Beier, David Cannadine and James M. Rosenheim, pp. 271–304, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Brenner, Robert 1993, Merchants and Revolution: Commercial Change, Political Conflict, and London’s Overseas Traders, 1550–1653, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Brenner, Robert 1999, ‘Competition and Class: A Reply to Foster and McNally’, Monthly Review, 51, 7: 24–44.
-
Brenner, Robert 2006, ‘What Is, and What Is Not, Imperialism?’, Historical Materialism, 14, 4: 79–105.
-
Bukharin, Nikolai 1972 [1915], Imperialism and World Economy, London: Merlin Press.
-
Bukharin, Nikolai 1979 [1920], ‘The Economics of the Transition Period’, in The Politics and Economics of the Transition Period, edited by Kenneth J. Tarbuck, pp. 53–175, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
-
Bukharin, Nikolai 2011 [1922], ‘The Programme of the International and the Communist Parties’, in Toward the United Front: Proceedings of the Fourth Congress of the Communist International, 1922, edited and translated by John Riddell, pp. 479–501, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Byres, Terence 2009, ‘The Landlord Class, Peasant Differentiation, Class Struggle and the Transition to Capitalism: England, France and Prussia Compared’, Journal of Peasant Studies, 36, 1: 33–54.
-
Callinicos, Alex 1987, Making History: Agency, Structure and Change in Social Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Callinicos, Alex 1989, ‘Bourgeois Revolutions and Historical Materialism’, International Socialism, II, 43: 113–171.
-
Callinicos, Alex 1995, Theories and Narratives: Reflections on the Philosophy of History, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Callinicos, Alex 2013, ‘The Dynamics of Revolution: A Review of Neil Davidson’s How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?’, International Socialism, II, 137: 127–148.
-
Cobban, Alfred 1971 [1955], ‘The Myth of the French Revolution’, in Aspects of the French Revolution, pp. 90–112, London: Paladin.
-
Comninel, George 1987, Rethinking the French Revolution: Marxism and the Revisionist Challenge, London: Verso.
-
Crouzet, François 1996, ‘France’, in The Industrial Revolution in National Context: Europe and the USA, edited by Mikuláš Teich and Roy Porter, pp. 37–63, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Davidson, Neil 2001, ‘Marx and Engels on the Scottish Highlands’, Science and Society, 65, 3: 286–326.
-
Davidson, Neil 2003, Discovering the Scottish Revolution, 1692–1746, London: Pluto Press.
-
Davidson, Neil 2004, ‘The Scottish Path to Capitalist Agriculture. 2: The Capitalist Offensive (1747–1815)’, Journal of Agrarian Change, 4, 4: 411–460.
-
Davidson, Neil 2012, How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?, Chicago: Haymarket Books.
-
Davidson, Neil 2014, Holding Fast to an Image of the Past: Explorations in the Marxist Tradition, Chicago: Haymarket Books.
-
Davidson, Neil 2015, We Cannot Escape History: States and Revolutions, Chicago: Haymarket Books.
-
Davidson, Neil 2016, Nation-States: Consciousness and Competition, Chicago: Haymarket Books.
-
Davidson, Neil 2017, How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?, Abridged Edition, Chicago: Haymarket Books.
-
Duménil, Gérard and Dominique Lévy 2018, Managerial Capitalism: Ownership, Management and the Coming New Mode of Production, London: Pluto Press.
-
Engels, Frederick 1975 [1895], Engels to Conrad Schmidt, 12 March 1895, in Selected Correspondence, edited by S.W. Ryazanskaya, pp. 456–460, Third, Revised Edition, Moscow: Progress Publishers.
-
Engels, Frederick 1981 [1894], ‘Preface’, in Karl Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume Three, translated by David Fernbach, pp. 91–111, Harmondsworth: Penguin/New Left Review.
-
Foster, John 2002, ‘On Neil Davidson’s The Origins of Scottish Nationhood’, Historical Materialism, 10, 1: 258–271.
-
Fowler, Bridget 2014, Review of How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?, History of Political Thought, 35, 1: 206–209.
-
Friedman, Milton and Rose D. Friedman 1980, Free to Choose, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Furet, François 1981 [1978], ‘The French Revolution Is Over’, in Interpreting the French Revolution, translated by Elborg Forster, pp. 1–79, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Furet, François 2006 [1980], ‘The French Revolution Revisited’, in The French Revolution: Recent Debates and New Controversies, Second Edition, edited by Gary Kates, pp. 53–67, London: Routledge.
-
Gay, Paul du and Alan Scott 2010, ‘State Transformation or Regime Shift? Addressing Some Confusions in the Theory and Sociology of the State’, Sociologica, 2, available at: <http://www.sociologica.mulino.it/doi/10.2383/32707>.
-
Gerstenberger, Heide 1978, ‘Class Conflict, Competition and State Formation’, in State and Capital: A Marxist Debate, edited by John Holloway and Sol Picciotto, pp. 148–159, London: Edward Arnold.
-
Gerstenberger, Heide 2007 [1990], Impersonal Power: History and Theory of the Bourgeois State, translated by David Fernbach, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Gerstenberger, Heide 2017, ‘“How Bourgeois Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?” Remarks on Neil Davidson’s Book’, Historical Materialism, 7 September, <https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341529>.
-
Gerstenberger, Heide 2019, ‘“How Bourgeois Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?”: Remarks on Neil Davidson’s Book’, Historical Materialism, 27, 3: 191–209.
-
Gluckstein, Donny 2013, ‘Comment on Bourgeois Revolution’, International Socialism, II, 140: 177–184.
-
Gould, Roger 1995, Insurgent Identities: Class, Community, and Protest in Paris from 1848 to the Commune, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Gramsci, Antonio 1971 [1927–34], Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
-
Greenfeld, Liah 2001, The Spirit of Capitalism: Nationalism and Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Hagen, William 1988, ‘Capitalism and the Countryside in Early Modern Europe: Interpretations, Models, Debates’, Agricultural History, 62, 1: 13–47.
-
Hallas, Duncan 1988, ‘The Bourgeois Revolution’, Socialist Worker Review, 105: 17–21.
-
Harman, Chris 1971, ‘The Eastern Bloc’, in World Crisis: Essays in Revolutionary Socialism, edited by Jim Higgins and Nigel Harris, pp. 168–203, London: Hutchinson.
-
Harman, Chris 1989, ‘From Feudalism to Capitalism’, International Socialism, II, 45: 35–87.
-
Harris, Nigel 1986, The End of the Third World: Newly Industrialising Countries and the Decline of an Ideology, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Harvey, David 2003, Paris, Capital of Modernity, London: Routledge.
-
Hay, Denis and John Law 1989, Italy in the Age of the Renaissance, 1380–1530, London: Longman.
-
Heinrich, Michael 2012 [2004], An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s ‘Capital’, translated by Alexander Locascio, New York: Monthly Review Press.
-
Heller, Henry 2006, The Bourgeois Revolution in France, 1789–1815, New York: Berghahn Books.
-
Hobsbawm, Eric 1969, Industry and Empire: From 1750 to the Present Day, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Hobsbawm, Eric 1987, The Age of Empire, 1875–1914, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
-
Hobsbawm, Eric 2011 [1998], ‘On the Communist Manifesto’, in How to Change the World: Tales of Marx and Marxism, pp. 101–120, London: Little, Brown.
-
Horn, Jeff 2006, The Path Not Taken: French Industrialization in the Age of Revolution, 1750–1830, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
-
Israel, Jonathan 2011, Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights, 1750–1790, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Isset, Christopher and Stephen Miller 2017, The Social History of Agriculture: From the Origins to the Present Crisis, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
-
Jennings, Jeremy 2013, ‘Few Illusions’, Times Literary Supplement, 8 February: 23.
-
Jones, Colin 2006 [1990], ‘Bourgeois Revolution Revivified: 1789 and Social Change’, in The French Revolution: Recent Debates and New Controversies, Second Edition, edited by Gary Kates, pp. 87–112, London: Routledge.
-
Katz, Claudio 1993, ‘Karl Marx on the Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism’, Theory and Society, 22, 3: 363–389.
-
Lanchester, John 2010, Whoops! Why Everyone Owes Everyone Else and No One Can Pay, London: Allen Lane.
-
Linden, Marcel van der 2007, Western Marxism and the Soviet Union: A Survey of Critical Theories and Debates Since 1917, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Marot, John Eric 2012, ‘The Peasant Question and the Origins of Stalinism: Rethinking the Destruction of the October Revolution’, in The October Revolution in Prospect and Retrospect: Interventions in Russian and Soviet History, pp. 11–86, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Marx, Karl 1963 [1862–3], Theories of Surplus Value. Part 1, Moscow: Progress Publishers.
-
Marx, Karl 1973a [1850], ‘The Class Struggles in France: 1848 to 1850’, in Political Writings, Volume 2: Surveys from Exile, edited by David Fernbach, pp. 35–142, Harmondsworth: Penguin/New Left Review.
-
Marx, Karl 1973b [1857–8], Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft), translated by Martin Nicolaus, Harmondsworth: Penguin/New Left Review.
-
Marx, Karl 1975 [1859], ‘Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy’, in Early Writings, translated by Rodney Livingstone and Gregor Benton, pp. 424–428, Harmondsworth: Penguin/New Left Review.
-
Marx, Karl 1976a, ‘The Poverty of Philosophy: Answer to the Philosophy of Poverty by M. Proudhon’, in Marx/Engels Collected Works, Volume 6, pp. 105–212, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
-
Marx, Karl 1976b [1867], Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume One, translated by Ben Fowkes, Harmondsworth: Penguin/New Left Review.
-
Marx, Karl 1977 [1847/9], ‘Wage Labour and Capital’, in Marx/Engels Collected Works, Volume 9, pp. 197–228, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
-
Marx, Karl 1981 [1894], Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume Three, translated by David Fernbach, Harmondsworth: Penguin/New Left Review.
-
Marx, Karl and Frederick Engels 1973 [1848], ‘Manifesto of the Communist Party’, in Political Writings, Volume 1: The Revolutions of 1848, edited by David Fernbach, pp. 67–98, Harmondsworth: Penguin/New Left Review.
-
Marzagalli, Sylvia 2015, ‘Economic and Demographic Developments’, in The Oxford Handbook of the French Revolution, edited by David Andress, pp. 3–20, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Mattick, Paul 1974, Marx and Keynes: The Limits of the Mixed Economy, London: Merlin Press.
-
Nimtz, August H. 2000, Marx and Engels: Their Contribution to the Democratic Breakthrough, Albany, NY: State University of New York.
-
Post, Charles 2011, The American Road to Capitalism: Studies in Class-Structure, Economic Development and Political Conflict, 1620–1877, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Post, Charles 2017, ‘How Capitalist Were the “Bourgeois Revolutions”?’, Historical Materialism, 7 September, <https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-12341528>.
-
Post, Charles 2019, ‘How Capitalist Were the “Bourgeois Revolutions”?’, Historical Materialism, 27, 3: 157–190.
-
Prinz, Arthur 1969, ‘Background and Alternative Motive of Marx’s “Preface” of 1859’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 30, 3: 437–451.
-
Radek, Karl 2011 [1915], ‘The Driving Forces of Imperialism’, in Discovering Imperialism: Social Democracy to World War I, edited by Richard B. Day and Daniel Gaido, pp. 859–872, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Riley, Dylan 2015, ‘Property Leading the People?’, New Left Review, II, 95: 109–125.
-
Roederer, Pierre-Louis 1989 [1815], ‘The Spirit of the Revolution of 1789’, in The Spirit of the Revolution of 1789 and Other Writings of the Revolutionary Epoch, edited by Murray G. Forsyth, pp. 1–69, Aldershot: Scholar Press.
-
Rosdolsky, Roman 1977 [1968], The Making of Marx’s Capital, London: Pluto Press.
-
Rousset, David 1982 [1973], The Legacy of the Bolshevik Revolution: A Critical History of the USSR, Volume 1, London: Allison and Busby.
-
Samuel, Raphael 1977, ‘The Workshop of the World’, History Workshop Journal, 3: 6–72.
-
Sayer, Derek 1979, Marx’s Method: Ideology, Science and Critique in ‘Capital’, Brighton: The Harvester Press.
-
Soboul, Albert 1989 [1962], The French Revolution, 1789–1799: From the Storming of the Bastille to Napoleon, London: Unwin Hyman.
-
Stalin, Joseph Vissarionovich 1954 [1925], ‘Speech Delivered at a Plenum of the Central Committee of the R.C.P.(B.), January 19, 1925’, in Works, Volume 7, 1925, pp. 11–14, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
-
Ste. Croix, Geoffrey de 1981, The Class Struggle in the Ancient Greek World: From the Archaic Age to the Arab Conquests, London: Duckworth.
-
Teschke, Benno 2003, The Myth of 1648: Class, Geopolitics and the Making of Modern International Relations, London: Verso.
-
Therborn, Göran 1977, ‘The Rule of Capital and the Rise of Democracy’, New Left Review, I, 103: 3–41.
-
Therborn, Göran 1978, What Does The Ruling Class Do When It Rules? State Apparatuses and State Power under Feudalism, Capitalism and Socialism, London: New Left Books.
-
Thompson, Edward Palmer 1981 [1978], ‘The Poverty of Theory: Or, An Orrery of Errors’, in The Poverty of Theory and Other Essays, Fourth Impression, pp. 1–110, London: Merlin Press.
-
Tocqueville, Alexis de 1974 [1856], The Ancien Régime and the French Revolution, London: Fontana.
-
Trotsky, Leon 1972 [1924], ‘For the Internationalist Perspective’, in Leon Trotsky Speaks, pp. 198–208, New York: Pathfinder Press.
-
Wallerstein, Immanuel 1989, The Modern World System III: The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy, 1730s–1840s, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
-
Weber, Max 1949 [1904], On the Methodology of the Social Sciences, edited and translated by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch, Glencoe, NY: The Free Press.
-
Weber, Max 1976 [1904–5], The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, translated by Talcott Parsons, London: George Allen and Unwin.
-
Weber, Max 1998 [1896], ‘The Social Causes of the Decline of Ancient Civilization’, in The Agrarian Sociology of Ancient Civilizations, translated by R.I. Frank, London: Verso.
-
Wolfreys, Jim 2007, ‘Twilight Revolution: François Furet and the Manufacture of Consent’, in History and Revolution: Refuting Revisionism, edited by Mike Haynes and Jim Wolfreys, pp. 50–70, London: Verso.
-
Wood, Ellen Meiksins 2002a [1999], The Origin of Capitalism: A Longer View, London: Verso.
-
Wood, Ellen Meiksins 2002b, ‘Global Capital, National States’, in Historical Materialism and Globalization, edited by Mark Rupert and Hazel Smith, pp. 17–39, London: Routledge.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 707 | 101 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 481 | 10 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 493 | 36 | 4 |
Capitalist Outcomes, Ideal Types, Historical Realities
In: Historical MaterialismAbstract
This article is a response to some of the criticisms made of How Revolutionary were the Bourgeois Revolutions? by Gerstenberger, Post and Riley. In particular, it focuses on two issues of definition – that of capitalism and the capitalist nation-state – which arise from the book’s ‘consequentialist’ claim that bourgeois revolutions are defined by a particular outcome: the establishment of nation-states dedicated to the accumulation of capital.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 707 | 101 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 481 | 10 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 493 | 36 | 4 |