Inheriting Marx
Daniel Bensaïd, Ernst Bloch and the Discordance of Time
In: Historical Materialism
Search for other papers by Filippo Menozzi in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This essay traces a Marxist notion of cultural heritage drawing on the work of twentieth-century thinkers Daniel Bensaïd and Ernst Bloch. Both authors, indeed, address the act of inheriting as a way of rethinking Marxism beyond determinist and teleological concepts of history. In particular, Bensaïd’s 1995 Marx for Our Times and a 1972 essay on cultural heritage by Ernst Bloch reimagine the handing-on of cultural inheritance as the political reactivation of untimely and non-synchronous survivals of past social formations. For this reason, the heritage of Marx conveyed by these authors does not result in a nostalgic preservation of the past but in reviving unrealised possibilities of social transformation. In a comparative reading of Bensaïd and Bloch, the act of ‘inheriting Marx’ analysed in this essay hence formulates a de-commodifying conception of cultural heritage set against the violence of capital.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Ali, Tariq 2016, Fear of Mirrors: A Fall-of-Communism Novel, London: Verso.
-
Benjamin, Walter 1975, ‘Eduard Fuchs: Collector and Historian’, translated by Knut Tarnowski, New German Critique, 5: 27–58.
-
Benjamin, Walter 1999, ‘Unpacking My Library’, in Illuminations, edited by Hannah Arendt, translated by Harry Zohn, pp. 61–70, London: Pimlico.
-
Bensaïd, Daniel 1990, ‘Résolution sur la situation internationale. “Nouvel ordre” ou instabilité mondiale?’, available at: <https://www.danielbensaid.org/IMG/pdf/1990_06_00_db_307-2.pdf>.
-
Bensaïd, Daniel 2000, ‘Trotski, un passeur du siècle’, available at: <http://danielbensaid.org/IMG/pdf/2000_08_00_db_82.pdf>.
-
Bensaïd, Daniel 2002, Marx for Our Times, translated by Gregory Elliott, London: Verso.
-
Bensaïd, Daniel 2006, ‘Marxisms, Theory, Yesterday and Today’, available at: <https://www.danielbensaid.org/IMG/pdf/2006_12_01_db_e_520.pdf>.
-
Bensaïd, Daniel 2013, An Impatient Life: A Memoir, translated by David Fernbach, London: Verso.
-
Bensaïd, Daniel 2014, ‘Rearguard Seasonals’, in Tombazos 2014, pp. xix–xxiv.
-
Bensaïd, Daniel 2016, ‘Utopia and Messianism: Bloch, Benjamin, and the Sense of the Virtual’, translated by Patrick King, Historical Materialism, 24, 4: 36–50.
-
Blanchot, Maurice 1997, ‘Marx’s Three Voices’, in Friendship, translated by Tom Keenan, pp. 97–100, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Bloch, Ernst 1972, Das Materialismusproblem, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
-
Bloch, Ernst 1976, ‘Dialectics and Hope’, translated by Mark Ritter, New German Critique, 9: 3–10.
-
Bloch, Ernst 1986, The Principle of Hope, Volume 1, translated by Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice and Paul Knight, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
-
Bloch, Ernst 1988, The Utopian Function of Art and Literature, translated by Jack Zipes and Frank Mecklenburg, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
-
Bloch, Ernst 1991, Heritage of Our Times, translated by Neville Plaice and Stephen Plaice, Cambridge: Polity Press.
-
Bloch, Ernst 1998, Literary Essays, translated by Andrew Joron et al., Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Bloch, Ernst 2018, On Karl Marx, translated by John Maxwell, London: Verso.
-
Derrida, Jacques 1994, Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International, translated by Peggy Kamuf, New York: Routledge.
-
Durst, David C. 2002, ‘Ernst Bloch’s Theory of Nonsimultaneity’, The Germanic Review, 77, 3: 171–194.
-
Eagleton, Terry 1999, ‘Marxism without Marxism’, in Sprinker (ed.) 1999, pp. 83–87.
-
Edwards, Caroline 2013, ‘Uncovering the “Gold-bearing Rubble”: Ernst Bloch’s Literary Criticism’, in Utopianism, Modernism and Literature in the Twentieth Century, edited by Alice Reeve-Tucker and Nathan Waddell, pp. 182–203, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Fuchs, Christian and Lara Monticelli 2018, ‘Repeating Marx: Introduction to “Karl Marx @ 200: Debating Capitalism & Perspectives for the Future of Radical Theory”’, tripleC, 16, 2: 406–414.
-
Gramsci, Antonio 2007, Quaderni del Carcere. Volume secondo: Quaderni 6–11 (1930–1933), edited by Valentino Gerratana, Turin: Einaudi.
-
Hall, Stuart 1973, A ‘Reading’ of Marx’s 1857 Introduction to the Grundrisse, Birmingham: Centre for Cultural Studies.
-
Harootunian, Harry 2015, Marx after Marx: History and Time in the Expansion of Capitalism, New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Harvey, David 2017, Marx, Capital, and the Madness of Economic Reason, New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Jameson, Fredric 2003, A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present, London: Verso.
-
Kant, Immanuel 1996, The Metaphysics of Morals, edited by Mary J. Gregory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Kellner, Douglas 1983, ‘Introduction to Ernst Bloch’s “Dialectical Method”’, Man and World, 16, 4: 281–313.
-
Kellner, Douglas and Harry O’Hara 1976, ‘Utopia and Marxism in Ernst Bloch’, New German Critique, 9: 11–34.
-
Lebowitz, Michael A. 2009, Following Marx: Method, Critique and Crisis, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Löwy, Michael 1981, The Politics of Combined and Uneven Development, London: Verso.
-
Löwy, Michael 2005, Fire Alarm: Reading Walter Benjamin’s ‘On the Concept of History’, translated by Chris Turner, London: Verso.
-
Lukács, Georg 1971, History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics, translated by Rodney Livingstone, London: Merlin Press.
-
Marx, Karl 1869, ‘The Right of Inheritance’, available at: <https://www.marxists.org/history/international/iwma/documents/1869/inheritance-report.htm>.
-
Marx, Karl 1992, Early Writings, translated by Rodney Livingstone and Gregor Benton, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Marx, Karl 1993, Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy, translated by Martin Nicolaus, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Moir, Cat 2016, ‘Casting a Picture: Utopia, Heimat and the Materialist Concept of History’, Anthropology & Materialism, 3: 1–18.
-
Moir, Cat 2018, ‘Ernst Bloch: The Principle of Hope’, in The SAGE Handbook of Frankfurt School Critical Theory, edited by Beverley Best, Werner Bonefeld and Chris O’Kane, pp. 199–215, London: SAGE Publications.
-
Rabinbach, Anson 1977, ‘Unclaimed Heritage: Ernst Bloch’s Heritage of Our Times and the Theory of Fascism’, New German Critique, 11: 5–21.
-
Siebers, Johan 2011, ‘“Aufenthalt im unerhörten”: Bloch’s Reading of Hebel (1926–1965)’, Oxford German Studies, 40, 1: 62–71.
-
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty 1995, ‘Ghostwriting’, diacritics, 25, 2: 65–84.
-
Sprinker, Michael (ed.) 1999, Ghostly Demarcations: A Symposium on Jacques Derrida’s Spectres of Marx, London: Verso.
-
Thompson, Peter 2013, ‘Introduction’, in The Privatization of Hope: Ernst Bloch and the Future of Utopia, edited by Peter Thompson and Slavoj Žižek, pp. 4–20, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
-
Thompson, Peter 2016, ‘Ernst Bloch and the Spirituality of Utopia’, Rethinking Marxism, 28, 3–4: 438–452.
-
Tomba, Massimiliano 2013a, Marx’s Temporalities, translated by Peter D. Thomas and Sara R. Farris, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Tomba, Massimiliano 2013b, ‘Pre-Capitalistic Forms of Production and Primitive Accumulation: Marx’s Historiography from the Grundrisse to Capital’, in In Marx’s Laboratory: Critical Interpretations of the Grundrisse, edited by Riccardo Bellofiore, Peter D. Thomas and Guido Starosta, pp. 393–411, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Tombazos, Stavros 2014, Time in Marx: The Categories of Time in Marx’s ‘Capital’, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Traverso, Enzo 2016, Left-Wing Melancholia: Marxism, History, and Memory, New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Trotsky, Leon 2017, History of the Russian Revolution, translated by Max Eastman, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Warwick Research Collective 2015, Combined and Uneven Development: Towards a New Theory of World-Literature, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
-
Wood, Ellen Meiksins 2016, Democracy against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism, London: Verso.
-
Zipes, Jack 1988, ‘Introduction: Toward a Realisation of Anticipatory Illumination’, in Bloch 1988, pp. xi–xliii.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1358 | 178 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 195 | 14 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 308 | 30 | 4 |
Inheriting Marx
Daniel Bensaïd, Ernst Bloch and the Discordance of Time
In: Historical Materialism
Search for other papers by Filippo Menozzi in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This essay traces a Marxist notion of cultural heritage drawing on the work of twentieth-century thinkers Daniel Bensaïd and Ernst Bloch. Both authors, indeed, address the act of inheriting as a way of rethinking Marxism beyond determinist and teleological concepts of history. In particular, Bensaïd’s 1995 Marx for Our Times and a 1972 essay on cultural heritage by Ernst Bloch reimagine the handing-on of cultural inheritance as the political reactivation of untimely and non-synchronous survivals of past social formations. For this reason, the heritage of Marx conveyed by these authors does not result in a nostalgic preservation of the past but in reviving unrealised possibilities of social transformation. In a comparative reading of Bensaïd and Bloch, the act of ‘inheriting Marx’ analysed in this essay hence formulates a de-commodifying conception of cultural heritage set against the violence of capital.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1358 | 178 | 18 |
| Full Text Views | 195 | 14 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 308 | 30 | 4 |