Orwell and Nineteen Eighty-Four Today: Genius and Tunnel Vision
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Darko Suvin in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Orwell, as he himself remarked, came from a lower, professional-service fraction of the English and imperial ruling class that was ‘simultaneously dominator and dominated’ (Raymond Williams), so that a combination of state and monopoly power became his abiding nightmare. His horizon was, as of the Spanish Civil War in 1936, a revolutionary socialism committed to freedom and equality, opposed both to Labourite social democracy and to Stalinist pseudo-communism. In this article, I concentrate on Nineteen Eighty-Four, drawing on narratology (its agential system, spacetime descriptions, and composition – ‘the Winston story’, the ‘Goldstein excerpts’, and the Appendix on Newspeak) and history. I conclude that Nineteen Eighty-Four has an interesting, but limited, ‘Tory anarchist’ stance and horizon: in revolt against the rulers, but not believing that the revolt can succeed (in direct polemic with the Communist Manifesto). In Orwell’s view there are ‘three kinds of people in the world, the High, the Middle and the Low’, but the mindless and passive Low reduce this to the Middle against the High, or intellect and impotence versus cynical power. ‘No economics’ entails here ‘no class struggle’, and a fair amount of misogyny. Orwell’s textural skill was penetrating, but his thematics very limited. Still, he was one of the first to notice the long-duration slide of politics toward fascism, even if he drew a mistaken consequence from it, as evident in his early conflation of Stalinism and Nazism into an untenable ‘totalitarianism’. Nineteen Eighty-Four remains a concerned, appealing, and in some ways useful text, albeit one that ultimately lacks wisdom.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Amis, Kingsley 1975 [1960], New Maps of Hell: A Survey of Science Fiction, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.
-
Berger, John 1972, G., London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
-
Bloch, Ernst 1959, Das Prinzip Hoffnung, Volume 1, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
-
Bourdieu, Pierre 2000, Pascalian Meditations, translated by R. Nice, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Churchill, Winston 1946, ‘Winston Churchill Speech – Iron Curtain’, available at: <www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/1946-03-05.pdf>.
-
Crick, Bernard 1982, George Orwell: A Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Crick, Bernard 2007, ‘Nineteen Eighty-Four: Context and Controversy’, in The Cambridge Companion to George Orwell, edited by John Rodden, pp. 160–178, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Curtius, Ernst Robert 1953, European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, translated by W.R. Trask, New York: Harper and Row.
-
Dalos, György 1983, 1985: What Happens after Big Brother Dies, translated by Stuart Clink Hood and Estella Schmid, New York: Pantheon Books.
-
Eco, Umberto 1979, The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts, Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
-
Eco, Umberto 1986, ‘Dictionary vs. Encyclopedia’, in Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language, pp. 46–86, Bloomington, IL: Indiana University Press.
-
Geyer, Michael and Sheila Fitzpatrick (eds.) 2009, Beyond Totalitarianism: Stalinism and Nazism Compared, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Jameson, Fredric 1994, The Seeds of Time, New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Jameson, Fredric 2005, Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions, London: Verso.
-
Kershaw, Ian 1994, ‘Totalitarianism Revisited’, Tel Aviver Jahrbuch für deutsche Geschichte, 23: 23–40.
-
Kershaw, Ian and Moshe Lewin (eds.) 1997, Stalinism and Nazism: Dictatorships in Comparison, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
London, Jack 2014 [1908], The Iron Heel, London: Heritage Illustrated Publishing.
-
Lotman, Jurij 1977, The Structure of the Artistic Text, translated by Ronald Vroon, Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Contributions, University of Michigan.
-
Marx, Karl and Frederick Engels 1888 [1848], Manifesto of the Communist Party, translated by Samuel Moore in cooperation with Frederick Engels, available at: <www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/pdf/Manifesto.pdf>.
-
McManus, Patricia 2020, ‘Anti-utopia in Search of Hope’, unpublished manuscript.
-
Menand, Louis 2019, ‘ “1984” at Seventy: Why We Still Read Orwell’s Book of Prophecy’, The New Yorker, 9 June, available at: <www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/1984-at-seventy-why-we-still-read-orwells-book-of-prophecy>.
-
Moylan, Tom 1986, Demand the Impossible: Science Fiction and the Utopian Imagination, London: Methuen.
-
Moylan, Tom 2000, Scraps of the Untainted Sky: Science Fiction, Utopia, Dystopia, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
-
Norris, Christopher (ed.) 1984, Inside the Myth – Orwell: Views from the Left, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
-
Orwell, George 1989 [1937], The Road to Wigan Pier, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Orwell, George 2004, Nineteen Eighty-Four, with an Introduction by Thomas Pynchon, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Orwell, Sonia and Ian Angus (eds.) 1968a, Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, Volume 1, London: Secker and Warburg.
-
Orwell, Sonia and Ian Angus (eds.) 1968b, Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, Volume 2, London: Secker and Warburg.
-
Orwell, Sonia and Ian Angus (eds.) 1968c, Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, Volume 3, London: Secker and Warburg.
-
Orwell, Sonia and Ian Angus (eds.) 1968d, Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, Volume 4, London: Secker and Warburg.
-
Patai, Daphne 1984, The Orwell Mystique: A Study in Male Ideology, Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
-
Patai, Daphne 2008, ‘Third Thoughts about Orwell’, in What Price Utopia? Essays on Ideological Policing, Feminism, and Academic Affairs, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
-
Rai, Alok 1990, Orwell and the Politics of Despair: A Critical Study of the Writings of George Orwell, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Rees, Richard 1961, George Orwell: Fugitive from the Camp of Victory, Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
-
Ricoeur, Paul 1976, Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning, Fort Worth, TX: Texas Christian University Press.
-
Rodden, John 1989, George Orwell: The Politics of Literary Reputation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Rose, Jonathan 2007, ‘Englands His Englands’, in The Cambridge Companion to George Orwell, edited by John Rodden, pp. 28–42, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Sanderson, Richard K. 1988, ‘The Two Narrators and Happy Ending of Nineteen Eighty-Four’, Modern Fiction Studies, 34, 4: 587–595.
-
Sargent, Lyman T. 1994, ‘The Three Faces of Utopianism Revisited’, Utopian Studies, 5, 1: 1–37.
-
Saunders, Frances Stonor 2000, The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters, New York: The New Press.
-
Silcox, Beejay 2019, ‘This Is the Way the World Ends’, Australian Book Review, 411, available at: <https://www.australianbookreview.com.au/abr-online/archive/2019/249-may-2019-no-411/5438-this-is-the-way-the-world-ends-by-beejay-silcox>.
-
Suvin, Darko 2008, ‘Emotion, Brecht, Empathy vs. Sympathy’, in The Brecht Yearbook, Volume 33, Gestus–Music–Text, pp. 53–67, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
-
Suvin, Darko 2013, ‘From the Archeology of Marxism and Communism: Two Essays in Political Epistemology’, Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe, 21, 2–3: 279–311.
-
Suvin, Darko 2015, ‘15 Theses about Communism and Yugoslavia, or The Two-Headed Janus of Emancipation through the State’, Critical Quarterly, 57, 2: 90–110 [reprinted as Chapter 5 of Suvin 2016b].
-
Suvin, Darko 2016a [1979], Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre, Enlarged Edition, edited by Gerry Canavan, Bern: Peter Lang.
-
Suvin, Darko 2016b, Splendour, Misery, and Possibilities: An X-Ray of Socialist Yugoslavia, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Suvin, Darko 2017a, Lessons from the Russian Revolution and Its Fallout, Research Paper Series of Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung Southeast Europe, № 7, available at: <www.rosalux.rs/en/lessons-russian-revolution-and-its-fallout>.
-
Suvin, Darko 2017b, ‘Parables and Uses of a Stumbling Stone’, Arcadia, 52, 2: 271–300.
-
Suvin, Darko 2019, ‘Utopia or Bust’, keynote speech at the Society for Utopian Studies, July 2019, submitted for publication.
-
Suvin, Darko 2020, ‘Words and Lesions: Epistemological Reflections on Violence, the 1968 Moment, and Revolution’, Critical Quarterly, 62, 1: 83–122.
-
Suvin, Darko n.d., ‘What Existential Anti-Utopia Means for Us’, unpublished manuscript.
-
Wegner, Phillip E. 2002, Imaginary Communities: Utopia, the Nation, and the Spatial Histories of Modernity, Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
White, Hayden 1976, ‘The Fictions of Factual Representation’, in The Literature of Fact: Selected Papers from the English Institute, edited by Angus Fletcher, pp. 21–44, New York: Columbia University Press.
-
Williams, Raymond 1971, Orwell, London: Fontana.
-
Williams, Raymond 1980, ‘The Bloomsbury Fraction’, in Problems in Materialism and Culture, pp. 148–169, London: Verso.
-
Williams, Raymond 1984, ‘Afterword: Nineteen Eighty-Four in 1984’, in Orwell, pp. 95–126, London: Fontana.
-
Williams, Raymond (ed.) 1974, George Orwell: A Collection of Critical Essays, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
-
Zamyatin, Yevgeny 1971, ‘On Literature, Revolution, Entropy & Other Matters’, in A Soviet Heretic: Essays by Yevgeny Zamyatin, edited and translated by Mirra Ginsburg, pp. 107–112, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1611 | 243 | 39 |
| Full Text Views | 300 | 20 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 575 | 54 | 5 |
Orwell and Nineteen Eighty-Four Today: Genius and Tunnel Vision
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Darko Suvin in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Orwell, as he himself remarked, came from a lower, professional-service fraction of the English and imperial ruling class that was ‘simultaneously dominator and dominated’ (Raymond Williams), so that a combination of state and monopoly power became his abiding nightmare. His horizon was, as of the Spanish Civil War in 1936, a revolutionary socialism committed to freedom and equality, opposed both to Labourite social democracy and to Stalinist pseudo-communism. In this article, I concentrate on Nineteen Eighty-Four, drawing on narratology (its agential system, spacetime descriptions, and composition – ‘the Winston story’, the ‘Goldstein excerpts’, and the Appendix on Newspeak) and history. I conclude that Nineteen Eighty-Four has an interesting, but limited, ‘Tory anarchist’ stance and horizon: in revolt against the rulers, but not believing that the revolt can succeed (in direct polemic with the Communist Manifesto). In Orwell’s view there are ‘three kinds of people in the world, the High, the Middle and the Low’, but the mindless and passive Low reduce this to the Middle against the High, or intellect and impotence versus cynical power. ‘No economics’ entails here ‘no class struggle’, and a fair amount of misogyny. Orwell’s textural skill was penetrating, but his thematics very limited. Still, he was one of the first to notice the long-duration slide of politics toward fascism, even if he drew a mistaken consequence from it, as evident in his early conflation of Stalinism and Nazism into an untenable ‘totalitarianism’. Nineteen Eighty-Four remains a concerned, appealing, and in some ways useful text, albeit one that ultimately lacks wisdom.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1611 | 243 | 39 |
| Full Text Views | 300 | 20 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 575 | 54 | 5 |
