Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
The Materialist Dialectic in Boris Hessen’s Newton Papers (1927 and 1931)
In: Historical MaterialismAbstract
Boris Hessen’s ‘The Social and Economic Roots of Newton’s Principia’ (see https://doi.org./10.1163/1569206X-00002041) is considered a pioneering work in the historiography of the natural sciences. For some, it marks the founding moment of the ‘externalist’ approach to this field of study. Previously, Hessen published another paper on Newton entitled ‘Preface to Articles by A. Einstein and J.J. Thomson’, which, some maintain, bears a stronger resemblance to works in the ‘internalist’ camp of the historiography of the natural sciences. For decades, scholars have puzzled over why Hessen chose to argue for, seemingly, diametrically opposed positions. In this paper, however, I argue that Hessen does not advance two different historiographical methods, but a single, dialectical-materialist approach that accounts for the ‘unity in opposition’ of the external and internal dimensions of natural-scientific theory. I draw from Hessen’s two papers on Newton, his previously untranslated writings, as well as selections from the secondary literature.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Althusser, Louis 1971a [1968], ‘Lenin and Philosophy’, in Althusser 1971c.
-
Althusser, Louis 1971b [1970], ‘Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation)’, in Althusser 1971c.
-
Althusser, Louis 1971c, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, translated by Ben Brewster, New York:Monthly Review Press.
-
Bynum, W.F., E.J. Browne and Roy Porter (eds.) 1981, Dictionary of the History of Science, London: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
-
Chilvers, C.A.J. 2007, ‘The Tragedy of Comrade Hessen: Biography as Historical Discourse’, in The History and Poetics of Scientific Biography, edited by Thomas Söderqvist, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
-
Descartes, René 1985 [1647], Principles of Philosophy, in The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Volume 1, edited and translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and Dugald Murdoch, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Einstein, Albert 1954 [1927], ‘The Mechanics of Newton and Their Influence on the Development of Theoretical Physics’, in Ideas and Opinions, edited by Carl Seeling et al., translated by Sonja Bargmann, New York: Crown Publishers.
-
Engels, Friedrich 2010 [1886], Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy, in Marx/Engels Collected Works, Volume 26, Engels 1882–89, edited by Boris Tartakovsky, translated by Nicholas Jacobs et al., London: Lawrence & Wishart.
-
Freudenthal, Gideon 2005, ‘The Hessen–Grossmann Thesis: An Attempt at Rehabilitation’, Perspectives on Science, 13, 2: 166–193.
-
Freudenthal, Gideon and Peter McLaughlin 2009a, ‘Boris Hessen: In Lieu of a Biography’, in Freudenthal and McLaughlin (eds.) 2009.
-
Freudenthal, Gideon and Peter McLaughlin 2009b, ‘Classical Marxist Historiography of Science: The Hessen–Grossmann Thesis’, in Freudenthal and McLaughlin (eds.) 2009.
-
Freudenthal, Gideon and Peter McLaughlin (eds.) 2009, The Social and Economic Roots of the Scientific Revolution: Texts by Boris Hessen and Henryk Grossman, Dordrecht: Springer.
-
Gorelik, Gennady and Antonina W. Bouis 2005, The World of Andrei Sakharov: A Russian Physicist’s Path to Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Graham, Loren 1985, ‘The Socio-Political Roots of Boris Hessen: Soviet Marxism and the History of Science’, Social Studies of Science, 15, 4: 705–722.
-
Halley, Edmond 1960 [1686], ‘Halley to Newton (29 June 1686)’, in The Correspondence of Isaac Newton, Volume 2, 1676–1687, edited by H.W. Turnbull, F.R.S., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Hessen, Boris 2009 [1931], ‘The Social and Economic Roots of Newton’s Principia’, translated by Philippa Schimrat, in Freudenthal and McLaughlin (eds.) 2009.
-
Hessen, Boris 2019 [1927], ‘Preface to Articles by A. Einstein and J.J. Thomson’, translated by Sean Winkler, Society and Politics, 13, 1: 87–102.
-
Ienna, Gerardo and Giulia Rispoli 2019, ‘Boris Hessen at the Crossroads of Science and Ideology: From International Circulation to the Soviet Context’, Society and Politics, 13, 1: 37–63.
-
Joravsky, David 1955, ‘Soviet Views on the History of Science’, Isis, 46, 1: 3–13.
-
Joravsky, David 2009 [1961], Soviet Marxism and Natural Science, 1917–1932, London: Routledge.
-
Josephson, Paul 2019, ‘Boris Hessen as Philosopher and Polemicist: Ideology, Politics and the New Physics in the Soviet Union in the 1920s and 1930s’, Society and Politics, 13, 1: 10–36.
-
Lamb, Horace 1927, ‘Newton’s Work in Mechanics’, Nature, 119: 33–35.
-
Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich 1972a [1915], ‘Conspectus of Hegel’s Book The Science of Logic’, in Collected Works, Volume 38, Philosophical Notebooks, edited by Stewart Smith, translated by Clemens Dutt, Moscow: Progress Publishers.
-
Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich 1972b [1925], ‘On the Question of Dialectics’, in Collected Works, Volume 38, Philosophical Notebooks, edited by Stewart Smith, translated by Clemens Dutt, Moscow: Progress Publishers.
-
Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich 1973 [1922], ‘On the Significance of Militant Materialism’, in Collected Works, Volume 33, August 1921–March 1923, edited by David Skvirsky, translated by George Hanna, Moscow: Progress Publishers.
-
Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich 1977a [1908], Materialism and Empirio-Criticism: Critical Notes concerning a Reactionary Philosophy, in Collected Works, Volume 14, 1908, edited by Clemens Dutt, translated by Abraham Fineberg, Moscow: Progress Publishers.
-
Lenin, Vladimir Ilyich 1977b [1913], ‘The Marx–Engels Correspondence’, in Collected Works, Volume 19, March–December 1913, edited by Robert Daglish, translated by George Hanna, Moscow: Progress Publishers.
-
Lukács, Georg 2000 [1996], Tailism and the Dialectic: A Defence of ‘History and Class Consciousness’, translated by Esther Leslie, London: Verso.
-
Mao Zedong 2017 [1937], ‘On Practice’, translator unknown, in On Practice and Contradiction, edited by Slavoj Žižek, London: Verso.
-
Marx, Karl 2010 [1859], A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, in Marx/Engels Collected Works, Volume 29, Marx 1857–61, edited by Svetlana Gerasimenko et al., translated by Victor Schmittke and Yuri Sdobnikov, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
-
Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels 2010 [1845], The German Ideology, in Marx/Engels Collected Works, Volume 5, Marx and Engels 1845–47, edited by Georgi Bagaturia and Norair Ter-Akopyan, translated by Maurice Cornforth et al., London: Lawrence & Wishart.
-
Morrell, J.B. 1981a, ‘Externalism’, in Bynum, Browne and Porter (eds.) 1981.
-
Morrell, J.B. 1981b, ‘Internalism’, in Bynum, Browne and Porter (eds.) 1981.
-
Pechenkin, Alexander 2019 [2013], L.I. Mandelstam and His School in Physics, Second Edition, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
-
Plekhanov, Georgi 1940 [1898], The Role of the Individual in History, translator unknown, New York: International Publishers.
-
Pope, Alexander 1902 [1730], ‘Epitaph on Sir Isaac Newton’, in Every Day in the Year: A Poetical Epitome of the World’s History, edited by James L. Ford and Mary K. Ford, New York: Dodd, Mead & Co., available at: <https://www.bartleby.com/297/154.html>.
-
Schäfer, Wolf 1988, ‘Boris Hessen and the Politics of the Sociology of Science’, Thesis Eleven, 21, 1: 103–116.
-
Stalin, Joseph Vissarionovich 1954 [1929], ‘A Year of Great Change: On the Occasion of the Twelfth Anniversary of the October Revolution’, in Works, Volume 12, April 1929–June 1930, translated by Brian Reid, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
-
Stalin, Joseph Vissarionovich 2013 [1938], Dialectical and Historical Materialism, translator unknown, New York: Prism Key Press.
-
Thomson, Joseph John 1927, ‘Newton’s Work in Physics’, Nature, 119: 36–40.
-
Trotsky, Leon 2011 [1922], ‘Attention to Theory: Letter to the Editor of Under the Banner of Marxism’, translated by Yevgeniy Garmize and Alex Gonopolskiy, Platypus Review, 34: 1–3.
-
Whitehead, Alfred North 1923, ‘The First Physical Synthesis’, in Science and Civilization, edited by F.S. Marvin, London: Oxford University Press.
-
Winkler, Sean 2020 forthcoming, ‘Practice and Ideology in Boris Hessen’s “The Social and Economic Roots of Newton’s Principia”’, Telos, 190.
-
Young, Robert 1990, ‘Marxism and the History of Science’, in Companion to the History of Modern Science, edited by R.C. Olby, G.N. Cantor, J.R.R. Christie and M.J.S. Hodge, London: Routledge.
-
Einstein, Albert 1927, ‘Newtons Mechanik und ihr Einfluß auf die Gestaltung der theoretischen Physik’, Die Naturwissenschaften, 15, 12: 273–276.
-
Mie, Gustav 1925, Das Problem der Materie; öffentliche Antrittsrede gehalten am 26 Januar 1925, Freiburg in Baden: Speyer & Kearner.
-
Бажанов, В. [Bazhanov, V.] 2018, ‘Марксистская история и философия науки под прессом идеологизированной науки. Случай гессена [Marxist History and Philosophy of Science under the Ideologised Scientific Press: The Case of B.M. Hessen]’, in Революция, эволютция и диалог култур [Revolution, Evolution and Cultural Dialogue], edited by А. Черняев [A. Chernyayev], Москва [Moscow]: Гнозис [Gnosis].
-
Ермичëв, А.А. [Ermichëv, A.A.] 2012, ‘Рецензия на Журнал Под знаменем марксизма 1922–1944. Указатель содержания [Review of The Journal Under the Banner of Marxism 1922–1944. Index of Contents]’, Вопросы философии [Problems of Philosophy], 7: 184–186.
-
Гессен, Борис [Hessen, Boris] 1927a, ‘От редакции [From the Editors]’, Под знаменем марксизма [Under the Banner of Marxism], 1: 118–119.
-
Гессен, Борис 1927b, ‘Предисловие к статьям А. Эйнштейна и Дж. Дж. Томсона [Preface to Articles by A. Einstein and J.J. Thomson]’, Под знаменем марксизма, 4: 152–165.
-
Гессен, Борис 1927c, ‘Мариан Смолуховский (к десятилетию со дня смерти) [Marian Smoluchowski (On the Tenth Anniversary of His Death)]’, Под знаменем марксизма, 9: 144–148.
-
Гессен, Борис 1928, ‘Механический материализм и современная физика [Mechanistic Materialism and Modern Physics]’, Под знаменем марксизма, 7/8: 5–47.
-
Гессен, Борис 2018 [1931], ‘Выступление на заседании президиума коммунистической академии [Speech at the Meeting of the Presidium of the Communist Academy (1 August 1931)]’, edited by С.Н. Корсаков [S.N. Korsakov], Эпистемология и философия науки [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science], 3: 205–210.
-
Гессен, Борис 2019 [1930], ‘Материалистическая диалектика и современная физика. Тезисы доклада на I всесоюзном съезде физиков в одессе 19 августа 1930г. [Materialist Dialectics and Modern Physics: Abstracts of the Report at the First All-Union Congress of Physicists in Odessa on 19 August 1930]’, edited by С.Н. Корсаков, Эпистемология и философия науки, 1: 209–215.
-
Гессен, Борис and Василий Егоршин [Vasiliy Egorshin] 1927a, ‘V съезд русских физиков [The Fifth Congress of Russian Physicists]’, Под знаменем марксизма, 1: 134–141.
-
Гессен, Борис and Василий Егоршин 1927b, ‘Об отношении тов. Тимирязева к современной науке [On Comrade Timiryazev’s Attitude towards Contemporary Science]’, Под знаменем марксизма, 2/3: 188–199.
-
Гессен, Борис and Василий Егоршин 1927c, Рецензия на Диалектика в природе [Review of Dialectics in Nature], Под знаменем марксизма, 2/3: 211–225.
-
Гессен, Борис and Иван Подволоцкий [Ivan Podvolotskiy] 1929, ‘Философские корни правого уклона [The Philosophical Roots of Right-Wing Opportunism]’, Под знаменем марксизма, 9: 1–29.
-
Гессен, Борис et al. 1930, ‘О борьбе на два фронта в философии [On the Fight on Two Fronts in Philosophy]’, Под знаменем марксизма, 5: 139–149.
-
Горелик, Г. [Gorelik, G.] 2018, ‘Объяснение гессену и вопрос нидема, или как марксизм помог задать важый вопрос и помешал ответить на него [Hessen’s Explanation and the Needham Question, or How Marxism Helped to Pose an Important Question but Hindered Answering It]’, Эпистемология и философия науки, 55: 153–171.
-
Касавин, И. [Kasavin, I.] 2018, ‘Борис Гессен и венский кружок: Революционные сдвиги и кризисы в истории и философии науки [Boris Hessen and The Vienna Circle: Revolutionary Shifts and Crises in the History and Philosophy of Science]’, in Революция, эволютция и диалог култур, edited by А. Черняев, Москва: Гнозис.
-
Корсаков, С.Н. 2018, ‘Слово товарищу гессену [The Floor is Given to Mr Hessen]’, Эпистемология и философия науки, 3: 202–204.
-
Корсаков, С.Н., А.В. Козенко and Г.Г. Грачева [Korsakov, S.N., A.V. Kozenko and G.G. Gracheva] 2015, Борис Михайлович Гессен. 1893–1936 [Boris Mikailovich Hessen. 1893–1936], Москва [Moscow]: Наука [Science].
-
Ламб, Горас 1927, ‘Работы Ньютона в области механики’, Под знаменем марксизма, 4: 182–185.
-
Ми, Густав 1927 [1925], ‘Проблема материи’, Под знаменем марксизма, 1: 120–133.
-
Родин, А. [Rodin, A.] 2018, ‘«Начала» Ньютона и их марксистский анализ у гессена [Newton’s “Beginnings” and Their Marxist Analysis from Hessen]’, in Революция, эволютция и диалог култур, edited by А. Черняев, Москва: Гнозис.
-
Сироткина, И. [Sirotkina, I.] 2018, ‘Революция в понимании научного знания: От Валентина Волошинова до Sociology of Scientific Knowledge [Revolution in the Understanding of Scientific Knowledge: From Valentin Vološinov to Sociology of Scientific Knowledge]’, in Революция, эволютция и диалог култур, edited by А. Черняев, Москва: Гнозис.
-
Столярова, Ольга [Stolyarova, Olga] 2017, ‘Идеи Б.М. Гессена и отечественная философия [The Ideas of Boris Hessen and Russian Philosophy]’, Философский журнал [The Philosophy Journal], 10: 112–132.
-
Томсон, Дж. Дж. 1927, ‘Работы Ньютона в области физики’, Под знаменем марксизма, 4: 174–181.
-
Эйнштейн, Альберт 1927, ‘Механика Ньютона и ее влияние на развитие теоретической физики’, Под знаменем марксизма, 4: 166–173.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 491 | 129 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 71 | 9 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 126 | 25 | 4 |
The Materialist Dialectic in Boris Hessen’s Newton Papers (1927 and 1931)
In: Historical MaterialismAbstract
Boris Hessen’s ‘The Social and Economic Roots of Newton’s Principia’ (see https://doi.org./10.1163/1569206X-00002041) is considered a pioneering work in the historiography of the natural sciences. For some, it marks the founding moment of the ‘externalist’ approach to this field of study. Previously, Hessen published another paper on Newton entitled ‘Preface to Articles by A. Einstein and J.J. Thomson’, which, some maintain, bears a stronger resemblance to works in the ‘internalist’ camp of the historiography of the natural sciences. For decades, scholars have puzzled over why Hessen chose to argue for, seemingly, diametrically opposed positions. In this paper, however, I argue that Hessen does not advance two different historiographical methods, but a single, dialectical-materialist approach that accounts for the ‘unity in opposition’ of the external and internal dimensions of natural-scientific theory. I draw from Hessen’s two papers on Newton, his previously untranslated writings, as well as selections from the secondary literature.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 491 | 129 | 6 |
| Full Text Views | 71 | 9 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 126 | 25 | 4 |