State–Bourgeoisie Relations under Neoliberalism with Turkish Characteristics
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Umut Bozkurt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article aims to analyse state–bourgeoisie relations in the era of AKP-rule in Turkey, with a specific focus on the 2018 economic crisis. It will discuss the following question: How did the AKP regime position itself with respect to the interests of the first- and second-generation bourgeoisie? Especially after 2010, the AKP was criticised for carrying out an extra-economic intervention in the sphere of accumulation as well as providing benefits to the Islamic second-generation bourgeoisie. This article draws on a Marxist conceptualisation of the state which underlines that the state’s autonomy from the economy is limited because its continued existence depends on the reproduction of accumulation, hence its need to intervene. However, the state cannot implement a unified interventionist strategy because it needs to maintain links with different groups of bourgeoisie as well as the proletariat. The article’s main argument is that the AKP struggled to balance the divergent interests of the first- and second-generation bourgeoisie and implemented policies that may be characterised as incoherent and contradictory. These contradictory policies also played an important role in the 2018 economic crisis.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Adaman, Fikret, Bengi Akbulut, Yahya Madra and Şevket Pamuk 2014, ‘Hitting the Wall: Erdoğan’s Construction-Based, Finance-Led Growth Regime’, The Middle East in London, 10, 3: 7–8.
-
Akçay, Ümit 2018a, ‘10 Soruda 2018 Ekonomik Krizi [The 2018 Crisis in 10 Questions]’, Gazete Duvar, 6 June, available at: <https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/yazarlar/2018/06/05/10-soruda-2018-ekonomik-krizi/>.
-
Akçay, Ümit 2018b, ‘Yeni Rejim’in Türkiyesi Kopuş ve Süreklilikler [The Turkey of the New Order: Rupture and Continuities]’, biartıbir, 19 July, available at: <https://birartibir.org/emek/112-kopus-ve-sureklilikler>.
-
Akçay, Ümit 2019, ‘Widening Cracks in the Ruling Coalition’, 1+1 Forum, 15 May, available at: <https://www.birartibir.org/international/341-widening-cracks-in-theruling-coalition>.
-
Akçay, Ümit and Ali Rıza Güngen 2018, ‘Lira’s Downfall is a Symptom: The Political Economy of Turkey’s Crisis’, Critical Macro Finance, 18 August, available at: <https://criticalfinance.org/2018/08/18/liras-downfall-is-a-symptom-the-political-economy-of-turkeys-crisis/>.
-
Aktan, İrfan 2018, ‘Röportaj Korkut Boratav: İktidara kim gelirse gelsin IMF’ye gitmek zorunda [Interview with Korkut Boratav: Whoever Comes to Power Should Go to the IMF]’, Gazete Duvar, 25 May, available at: <https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/yazarlar/2018/05/25/korkut-borataviktidara-kim-gelirse-gelsin-imfye-gitmek-zorunda/>.
-
Atalay, Zeynep 2017, ‘Partners in Patriarchy: Faith-Based Organizations and Neoliberalism in Turkey’, Critical Sociology, 45, 3: 431–445.
-
Aydın, Zülküf 2012, ‘Global Crisis, Turkey and the Regulation of Economic Crisis’, Capital & Class, 37, 1: 95–109.
-
Barker, Colin 2019, ‘Revolutionary Reflections | Notes on Capital and the State: Part 1’, 25 January, available at: <https://www.rs21.org.uk/2019/01/25/revolutionary-reflections-notes-on-capital-and-the-state-part-1/>.
-
Başkan, Filiz 2010, ‘The Rising Islamic Business Elite and Democratization in Turkey’, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 12, 4: 399–416.
-
Beriş, Emrah 2008, ‘Türkiye’de 1980 sonrası devlet sermaye ilişkileri ve ‘parçalı burjuvazi’nin oluşumu [State–Bourgeoisie Relations in Turkey after 1980 and the Formation of the “Fragmented Bourgeoisie”]’, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, <http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ey.10674>.
-
Bila, Fikret 2019, ‘Merkez Bankası Başkanı operasyonunun nedenleri ve siyasi riskler [The Reasons behind the Central Bank Operation and the Political Risks]’, T24, 8 July, available at: <https://t24.com.tr/yazarlar/fikret-bila/merkez-bankasi-baskani-operasyonunun-nedenleri-ve-siyasi-riskler,23066>.
-
Bonefeld, Werner 1992, ‘Social Constitution and the Form of the Capitalist State’, in Bonefeld, Gunn and Psychopedis (eds.) 1992, pp. 93–132.
-
Bonefeld, Werner 2000, ‘The Spectre of Globalization: On the Form and Content of the World Market’, in The Politics of Change: Globalization, Ideology and Critique, edited by Werner Bonefeld and Kostas Psychopedis, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Bonefeld, Werner 2006, ‘Marx’s Critique of Economics. On Lebowitz’, Historical Materialism, 14, 2: 83–94.
-
Bonefeld, Werner, Alice Brown and Peter Burnham 1995, A Major Crisis? The Politics of Economic Policy in Britain in the 1990s, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co.
-
Bonefeld, Werner, Richard Gunn and Kosmas Psychopedis (eds.) 1992, Open Marxism. Volume One: Dialectics and History, London: Pluto Press.
-
Boratav, Korkut 2003, Turkiye İktisat Tarihi: 1908–2002 [Turkey’s Economic History: 1908–2002], Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
-
Boratav, Korkut 2018, ‘YEP: IMFsiz bir IMF programı [An IMF Programme without the IMF]’, Sol Portal, 28 September, available at: <https://haber.sol.org.tr/yazarlar/korkut-boratav/yep-imfsiz-bir-imf-programi-248321>.
-
Boratav, Korkut 2019, ‘Berat Albayrak’ın “Reform” programı [The Reform Programme of Berat Albayrak]’, Sol Portal, 19 April, available at: <https://haber.sol.org.tr/yazarlar/korkut-boratav/berat-albayrakin-reform-programi-261239>.
-
Bozkurt, Umut 2013, ‘Neoliberalism with a Human Face: Making Sense of the Justice and Development Party’s Neoliberal Populism in Turkey’, Science & Society, 77, 3: 372–396.
-
Bozkurt, Umut 2015, ‘AKP Rule in the Aftermath of the Gezi Protests: From Expanded to Limited Hegemony?’, in Everywhere Taksim: Sowing the Seeds for a New Turkey at Gezi, edited by Isabel David and Kumru F. Toktamış, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
-
Bozkurt, Umut 2016, ‘Promoting Neoliberalism through Islam? The Case of the AKP in Turkey’, in Religious Activism in the Global Economy: Promoting, Reforming or Resisting Neoliberal Globalization?, edited by Sabine Dreher and Peter J. Smith, London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
-
Bozkurt-Güngen, Sümercan 2018, ‘Labour and Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Changes and Continuities under the AKP Governments in Turkey’, South European Society and Politics, 23, 2: 219–238.
-
Bruff, Ian 2014, ‘The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism’, Culture & Society, 26, 1: 113–129.
-
Bruff, Ian and Cemal Burak Tansel 2019, ‘Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Trajectories of Knowledge Production and Praxis’, Globalizations, 16, 3: 233–244.
-
Buğra, Ayşe 1994, State and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative Study, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
-
Buğra, Ayşe 1998, ‘Class, Culture, and the State: An Analysis of Interest Representation by Two Turkish Business Associations’, International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 30: 521–539.
-
Buğra, Ayşe and Osman Savaşkan 2014, Türkiye’de Yeni Kapitalizm Siyaset, Din ve İş Dünyası [The New Capitalism in Turkey: The Relationship between Politics, Religion and Business], İstanbul: İletişim.
-
Burnham, Peter 1996, ‘Capital, Crisis and the International System’, in Global Capital, National State and the Politics of Money, edited by Werner Bonefeld and John Holloway, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Burnham, Peter 2001, ‘New Labour and the Politics of Depoliticisation’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3, 2: 127–149.
-
Burnham, Peter 2006, ‘Marxism, the State, and British Politics’, British Politics, 1: 67–83.
-
Burnham, Peter, Werner Bonefeld and Alice Brown 1995, A Major Crisis?: The Politics of Economic Policy in Britain in the 1990s, Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Co.
-
Cengiz, Kurtuluş 2013, Yav İşte Fabrikalaşak [Let’s Set up Factories], İstanbul: İletişim.
-
Cetik, Mete and Yüksel Akkaya 1999, Turkiye’de Endustri İlişkileri [Industrial Relations in Turkey], İstanbul: Turkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfı.
-
Clarke, Simon 1988, Keynesianism, Monetarism and the Crisis of the State, Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing, Ltd.
-
Clarke, Simon 1991, ‘The State Debate’, in The State Debate, edited by Simon Clarke, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Demiralp, Seda 2009, ‘The Rise of Islamic Capital and the Decline of Islamic Radicalism in Turkey’, Comparative Politics, 41, 3: 315–335.
-
Deutsche Welle 2019, ‘US Charges Turkey’s Halkbank with Violating Iran Sanctions’, 15 October, available at: <https://www.dw.com/en/us-charges-turkeys-halkbank-with-violating-iran-sanctions/a-50848437>.
-
Dinler, Demet 2003, ‘Turkiye’de Güclü Devlet Tezinin Elestirisi [Criticism of the Strong State Thesis in Turkey]’, Praxis, 9: 17–54.
-
Dönmez, Pınar E. 2018, ‘Politicisation as Governing Strategy versus Resistance: Demystifying Capitalist Social Relations and the State in Turkey’, in Comparing Strategies of (De)Politicisation in Europe: Governance, Resistance and Anti-Politics, edited by Jim Buller, Pınar E. Dönmez, Adam Standring and Matthew Wood, pp. 155–188, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Dönmez, Pınar and Alex Sutton 2016, ‘Revisiting the Debate on Open Marxist Perspectives’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18, 3: 688–705.
-
Dorlach, Tim 2016, ‘The AKP between Populism and Neoliberalism: Lessons from Pharmaceutical Policy’, New Perspectives on Turkey, 55: 55–83.
-
Düzgün, Eren 2012a, ‘Class, State and Property: Modernity and Capitalism in Turkey’, European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 53, 2: 119–148.
-
Düzgün, Eren 2012b, ‘Review of Islam’s Marriage with Neoliberalism: State Transformation in Turkey by Yıldız Atasoy’, Historical Materialism, 20, 3: 181–200.
-
Eder, Mine 1999, ‘Becoming Western: Turkey and the European Union’, in Regionalism across the North/South Divide: State Strategies and Globalization, edited by Jean Grugel and Wil Hout, London: Routledge.
-
Ercan, Fuat and Şebnem Oğuz 2006, ‘Rescaling as a Class Relationship and Process: The Case of Public Procurement Law in Turkey’, Political Geography, 25, 6: 641–656.
-
Ercan, Fuat and Şebnem Oğuz 2015, ‘From Gezi Resistance to Soma Massacre: Capital Accumulation and Class Struggle in Turkey’, in Socialist Register 2015, pp. 114–135, London: The Merlin Press.
-
Ercan, Fuat and Şebnem Oğuz 2020, ‘Understanding the Recent Rise of Authoritarianism in Turkey in Terms of the Structural Contradictions of the Process of Capital Accumulation’, in Turkey’s New State in the Making: Transformations in Legality, Economy, Ideology and Coercion, edited by Pinar Bedirhanoglu, Çaglar Dölek, Funda Hülagü and Özlem Kaygusuz, London: Zed Books.
-
Erol, Isil and Umut Unal 2015, ‘Role of Construction Sector in Economic Growth: New Evidence from Turkey’, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, available at: <https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/68263/>.
-
Esen, Berk and Sebnem Gumuscu 2018, ‘Building a Competitive Authoritarian Regime: State–Business Relations in the AKP’s Turkey’, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 20, 4: 349–372.
-
Evrensel 2018, ‘AKP’nin son seçim rüşveti: Akaryakıtta ÖTV indirimi’, 17 May, available at: <https://www.evrensel.net/haber/352669/akpnin-son-secim-rusveti-akaryakitta-otv-indirimi>.
-
Ewing, Jack 2018, ‘Life in Turkey Now: Tough Talk, but Fears of Drug Shortages’, The New York Times, 17 August.
-
Geddes, Barbara 1994, Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
-
Gerstenberger, Heide 2017, ‘The Political Economy of Capitalist Labour’, Historical Materialism, 7 November, available at: <https://www.historicalmaterialism.org/blog/political-economy-capitalist-labour>.
-
Gürses, Uğur 2019, ‘Siyaset faiz düğmesine basınca’, Deutsche Welle Türkçe, 25 July, available at: <https://www.dw.com/tr/analizsiyaset-faiz-d%C3%BC%C4%9Fmesine-bas%C4%B1nca/a-49745014>.
-
Güven, Ali Burak 2012, ‘The IMF, the World Bank, and the Global Economic Crisis: Exploring Paradigm Continuity’, Development and Change, 43, 4: 869–898.
-
Harvey, David 2007, A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Hay, Colin, Michael Lister and David Marsh (eds.) 2006, The State: Theories and Issues, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Held, David 1995, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
-
Heper, Metin 1985, The State Tradition in Turkey, Beverley: Eothen Press.
-
Heper, Metin 1992, ‘The Strong State as a Problem for the Consolidation of Democracy: Turkey and Germany Compared’, Comparative Political Studies, 25, 2: 169–194.
-
Heper, Metin and Fuat Keyman 1998, ‘Double-Faced State: Political Patronage and the Consolidation of Democracy in Turkey’, Middle Eastern Studies, 34, 4: 259–277.
-
Heywood, Andrew 2019, Politics, London: Macmillan International Higher Education.
-
Hirsch, Joachim 1978, ‘The State Apparatus and Social Reproduction: Elements of a Theory of the Bourgeois State’, in State and Capital: A Marxist Debate, edited by John Holloway and Sol Picciotto, London: Edward Arnold.
-
Holloway, John and Sol Picciotto 1978, ‘Towards a Materialist Theory of the State’, in State and Capital: A Marxist Debate, edited by John Holloway and Sol Picciotto, London: Edward Arnold.
-
Hoşgör, Evren 2016, ‘New Fragmentations and New Alliances in the Turkish Bourgeoisie’, Journal für Entwicklungspolitik, XXXII, 1/2: 114–134.
-
İnsel, Ahmet 1996, Düzen ve Kalkınma Kıskacında Türkiye [Turkey in the Pincers of Order and Development], İstanbul: Ayrıntı.
-
İpek, Alim 2019, Sovereign Wealth Funds in the Context of Subordinate Financialisation: The Turkey Wealth Fund in a Comparative Perspective, MA Thesis, Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
-
Izak, A. and O. Bakış, 2013, ‘Structural Change and Industrial Policy in Turkey’, Working Papers 803, Economic Research Forum, November.
-
Jessop, Bob 2013, ‘Putting Neoliberalism in Its Time and Place: A Response to the Debate’, Social Anthropology, 21, 1: 6–67.
-
Kahler, Miles 1990, ‘Orthodoxy and Its Alternatives: Explaining Approaches to Stabilization and Adjustment’, in Economic Crisis and Policy Choice: The Politics of Adjustment in the Third World, edited by Joan M. Nelson, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Karatepe, İsmail Doğan 2013, ‘Islamists, Bourgeoisie and Economic Policies in Turkey’, Kurswechsel, 3: 53–62.
-
Karatepe, İsmail Doğan 2015, ‘Türkiye’de Devlet, Burjuvazi ve Yatırım Teşvikleri [State, Bourgeoisie and Investment Incentives]’, in Finansallasma, Devlet ve Politik Iktisat, edited by Hakan Mıhçı, İstanbul: Nota Bene.
-
Karatepe, İsmail Doğan 2016, ‘The State, Islamists, Discourses, and Bourgeoisie: The Construction Industry in Turkey’, Research and Policy on Turkey, 1, 1: 46–62.
-
Kaygusuz, Özlem 2018, ‘Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Regime Security in Turkey: Moving to an “Exceptional State” under AKP’, South European Society and Politics, 23, 2: 281–302.
-
Kazancıgil, Ali 1981, Atatürk, Founder of a Modern State, London: C. Hurst & Co.
-
Kazancigil, Ali 1994, ‘High Stateness in a Muslim Society: The Case of Turkey’, in Comparing Nations: Concepts, Strategies, Substance, edited by Mattei Doğan and Ali Kazancıgil, London: Wiley-Blackwell.
-
Keten, Emre Tansu 2018, ‘Mehmet Türkay’la Röportaj Prof. Türkay: Tüm cepheleriyle sermaye sınıfı AKP’nin yanında saf tutuyor [Interview with Prof. Türkay: All Sections of the Bourgeoisie Are Supporting the AKP]’, Gazete Karınca, 13 August, available at: <https://gazetekarinca.com/2018/08/prof-turkay-tum-cepheleriyle-sermaye-sinifi-akpnin-yaninda-saf-tutuyor/>.
-
Kömün 2018, ‘Korkut Boratav’la Röp0ortaj Neo-faşizm, popülizm diye adlandırılarak ona saygınlık kazandırılmaya çalışılıyor [Interview with Korkut Boratav: Neo-fascism Is Called Populism to Make it Respectable]’, 12 November, available at: <http://komundergi4.com/neo-fasizm-populizm-diye-adlandirilarak-ona-sayginlik-kazandirilmaya-calisiliyor/>.
-
Lepan, Alen 2020, ‘4 Years On, Trustee-run Firms Continue Adding to Turkish Economy with Financial Success’, Daily Sabah, 14 July, available at: <https://www.dailysabah.com/business/economy/4-years-on-trustee-run-firms-continue-adding-to-turkish-economy-with-financial-success>.
-
Mardin, Şerif 2006a, ‘Historical Thresholds and Stratification: Social Class and Class Consciousness’, in Religion, Society and Modernity in Turkey, edited by Şerif Mardin, Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
-
Mardin, Şerif 2006b, ‘Power, Civil Society and Culture in the Ottoman Empire’, in Religion, Society and Modernity in Turkey, edited by Şerif Mardin, Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
-
Mardin, Şerif 2008, Türkiye’de Toplum ve Siyaset [Society and Politics in Turkey], İstanbul: İletisim Yayınları.
-
Marx, Karl 1887 [1867], Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume I, Part IV: Production of Relative Surplus Value; Chapter Twelve: The Concept of Relative Surplus Value, translated by Samuel Moore and Edward Aveling, available at: <https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch12.htm>.
-
McNally, David 2019, ‘Thoughts on Marxism and the State’, 28 April, available at: <https://www.historicalmaterialism.org/blog/thoughts-marxism-and-state>.
-
O’Brien, Matt 2018, ‘Turkey’s Leader Is Helping to Crash its Currency’, The Washington Post, 16 May.
-
Oğuz, Şebnem 2016, ‘Yeni Türkiye’nin Siyasal Rejimi [The Political Regime of New Turkey]’, in Yeni Türkiye Kapitalizm, Devlet, Sınıflar, İstanbul: Sosyal Araştırmalar Vakfı.
-
Onaran, Özlem 2007, ‘Capital Flows, Turbulences, and Distribution: The Case of Turkey’, Intervention: Journal of Economics, 4, 2: 353–374.
-
Ongur, Hakan Ovunç 2018, ‘Plus Ça Change… Re-Articulating Authoritarianism in the New Turkey’, Critical Sociology, 44, 1: 45–59.
-
Öniş, Ziya 2006, ‘The Political Economy of Islam and Democracy in Turkey: From the Welfare Party to the AKP’, in Democracy and Development: New Political Strategies for the Middle East, edited by Dietrich Jung, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Öniş, Ziya and Umut Türem 2001, ‘Business, Globalization and Democracy: A Comparative Analysis of Turkish Business Associations’, Turkish Studies, 2, 2: 94–120.
-
Orhangazi, Özgür 2020, Türkiye Ekonomisinin Yapısı Sorunlar Kırılganlıklar ve Kriz Dinamikleri [The Structure of Turkey’s Economy: Vulnerability Issues and Crisis Dynamics], Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.
-
Oyan, Oğuz 2018, ‘Yeni Ekonomi Programı’, Sol Portal, 25 September, available at: <http://haber.sol.org.tr/yazarlar/oguzoyan/yeni-ekonomi-programi-248167>.
-
Özar, Şemsa and Fuat Ercan 2002, ‘Labor Markets in Turkey: Maladjustment or Integration?’, in The Ravages of Neo-Liberalism: Economy, Society and Gender in Turkey, edited by Neşecan Balkan and Sungur Savran, New York: Nova Science Publishers.
-
Özel, Işık 2003, ‘Beyond the Orthodox Paradox: The Breakup of State–Business Coalitions in 1980s Turkey’, Journal of International Affairs, 57, 1: 97–112.
-
Özel, Işık 2013, ‘Is it None of their Business? Business and Democratization, the Case of Turkey’, Democratization, 20, 6: 1081–1116.
-
Özel, Işık 2015, ‘Reverting Structural Reforms in Turkey: Towards an Illiberal Economic Governance?’, Global Turkey in Europe Policy Brief, May, available at: <https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/gte_pb_22.pdf>.
-
Özen, Hayriye 2015, ‘An Unfinished Grassroots Populism: The Gezi Park Protests in Turkey and Their Aftermath’, South European Society and Politics, 20, 4: 533–552.
-
Özturk, Özgür 2011, ‘Türkiye Finans Kapitali [Turkish Financial Capital]’, Devrimci Marksizm, 13–14: 106–132.
-
Özturk, Özgür 2012, ‘The Search for a New Development Model: Global Crisis and the Turkish Economy’, Vlaams Marxistisch Tijdschrift, 46, 3: 68–73.
-
Pashukanis, Evgeny 1951, ‘The General Theory of Law and Marxism’, in Soviet Legal Philosophy, edited by John Newbold Hazard, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Poulantzas, Nicos 1980 [1978], State, Power, Socialism, First Edition, London: NLB.
-
Poulantzas, Nicos 2000, State, Power, Socialism, London: Verso.
-
Poulantzas, Nicos 2012, Faşizm ve Diktatörlük [Fascism and Dictatorship], İstanbul: İletişim.
-
Radice, Hugo 2000, ‘Responses to Globalization: A Critique of Progressive Nationalism’, New Political Economy, 5, 1: 5–19.
-
Rooksby, Ed 2018, ‘“Structural Reform” and the Problem of Socialist Strategy Today’, Critique, 46, 1: 27–48.
-
Ryan, Matthew D.J. 2017, ‘Authoritarian Neoliberalism’: Crisis, the State, and the Challenge of Periodisation, MA Thesis, Sydney: University of Sydney.
-
Sabah 2016, ‘Son dakika haberi: FETÖ’nün 4 bin 724 şirketi kapatıldı!’, 19 December, available at: <https://www.sabah.com.tr/ekonomi/2016/12/19/son-dakika-haberi-fetonun-4-bin-724-sirketi-kapatildi>.
-
Sabah 2018, ‘MÜSİAD Genel Başkanı Abdurrahman Kaan: Yeni Ekonomi Programı çok iyi çalışılmış [MÜSİAD President Abdurrahman Kaan: The New Economy Programme Has Been Prepared Well]’, 20 September, available at: <https://www.sabah.com.tr/ekonomi/2018/09/20/musiad-genel-baskani-abdurrahman-kaan-yeni-ekonomi-programi-cok-iyi-calisilmis>.
-
Şanlı, Güldem Atabay 2019, ‘Gates of Lower Rates Now Open; Buckle up for a Bumpier Ride’, Para Analiz, 25 July, available at: <https://www.paraanaliz.com/intelligence/gates-of-lower-rates-nowopen-central-bank-delivers-425-basis-points-rate-cut/>.
-
Silverman, Reuben 2014, ‘Dogan versus Erdoğan: Business and Politics in AKP-Era Turkey’, Mediterranean Quarterly, 25, 2: 131–151.
-
Sönmez, Mustafa 1992, 100 Soruda Dışa Açılan Türkiye Kapitalizmi [The World-Integration of Turkish Capitalism in 100 Questions], İstanbul: Gerçek.
-
Sönmez, Mustafa 2014a, ‘İmar Yolsuzluklarına Karşı Demokrasi [Democracy Against Corruption in Reconstruction]’, Mimarlık Gündem, available at: <http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=390&RecID=3338>.
-
Sönmez, Mustafa 2014b, ‘Devletin Malı Deniz, AKP Yer, İhalesiz [The AKP Exploits State Resources without Tendering Bids]’, Mustafa Sönmez: Ekonomi, politika, medya, 7 January, available at: <http://mustafasonmez.net/devletin-mali-deniz-akp-yer-ihalesiz/>.
-
Sönmez, Mustafa 2016, ‘Kriz, AKP’de Tıkanma ve İhtimaller [Crisis, Impasse in the AKP, and Possibilities]’, Mustafa Sönmez: Ekonomi, politika, medya, 25 December, available at: <http://mustafasonmez.net/?p=5789>.
-
Sönmez, Mustafa 2019, ‘Voters’ Economic Confidence Dips Ahead of Key Istanbul Vote’, Al Monitor, 31 May, available at: <https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2019/05/turkey-voters-economic-confidence-dips-ahead-istanbul-vote.html>.
-
Sönmez, Ümit 2011, ‘The Political Economy of Market and Regulatory Reforms in Turkey: The Logic and Unintended Consequences of Ad-hoc Strategies’, New Political Economy, 16, 1: 101–130.
-
Sözcü 2017, ‘TMSF Başbakanlık’a bağlandı’, 25 July, available at: <https://www.sozcu.com.tr/2017/ekonomi/tmsf-basbakanlika-baglandi-1945178/>.
-
Sunar, İlkay 1974, State and Society in the Politics of Turkey’s Development, Ankara: Ankara University of Political Science.
-
Tansel, Cemal Burak 2015, ‘The Politics of Contemporary Capitalism in Turkey (and the Politics of its Interlocutors)’, Development and Change, 46, 3: 570–584.
-
Tansel, Cemal Burak 2018, ‘Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey: Beyond the Narratives of Progress’, South European Society and Politics, 23, 2: 197–217.
-
Temenna, Özlem 2018, ‘Söyleşi Sendika uzmanı Onur Bakır YEP’I değerlendirdi: Piyasalar sıcak para, tanrılar kurban istiyor [Interview: Union Expert Onur Bakır Assesses NEP – Markets Need Hot Money, Gods Demand Victims]’, Gazete Duvar, 13 October, available at: <https://sendikalmucadele.org/sendika-uzmani-onur-bakir-yepi-degerlendirdi-piyasalar-sicak-para-tanrilar-kurban-istiyor/>.
-
Tuğal, Cihan 2021, ‘Fight or Acquiesce? Religion and Political Process in Turkey’s and Egypt’s Neoliberalizations’, Development and Change, 43, 1: 23–51.
-
Turak, Natasha 2020, ‘Sovereign Wealth Funds Will Play a Bigger Role in Markets post-Coronavirus, Turkey Fund Chief Says’, CNBC Markets, 22 May, available at: <https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/22/sovereign-wealth-funds-have-a-bigger-role-post-covid-turkey-fund-chief.html>.
-
Wright, Chris 2006, ‘Review of What Is to Be Done? Leninism, Anti-Leninist Marxism and the Question of Revolution Today, edited by Werner Bonefeld and Sergio Tischler’, Historical Materialism, 14, 2: 241–257.
-
Yağcı, Mustafa 2018, ‘The Political Economy of Central Banking in Turkey: The Macroprudential Policy Regime and Self-Undermining Feedback’, South European Society and Politics, 23, 4: 525–545.
-
Yalman, Galip 1997, Bourgeoisie and the State: Changing Forms of Interest Representation within the Context of Economic Crises and Structural Adjustment: Turkey during the 1980s, PhD Thesis, Manchester: University of Manchester.
-
Yalman, Galip 2002, ‘The Turkish State and Bourgeoisie in Historical Perspective: A Relativist Paradigm or a Panoply of Hegemonic Strategies’, in The Politics of Permanent Crisis: Class, Ideology and State in Turkey, edited by Neşecan Balkan and Sungur Savran, New York: Nova Science Publishers.
-
Yankaya, Dilek 2013, Yeni İslami Burjuvazi Türk Modeli [The Turkish Model of the New Islamic Bourgeoisie], İstanbul: İletişim.
-
Yeldan, A. Erinç 1998, ‘On Structural Sources of the 1994 Turkish Crisis: A CGE Modeling Analysis’, The International Review of Applied Economics, 12, 3: 397–414.
-
Yeldan, Erinç 2003, Küreşellesme Sürecinde Türkiye Ekonomisi [Turkey’s Economy in the Process of Globalisation], İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
-
Yılmaz, Zafer 2003, ‘Günümüz Turkiye’sinde Devlet ve Hakim Sınıflar İlişkisi Üzerine [On the Relationship between the State and the Dominant Classes in Contemporary Turkey]’, Praxis, 9: 55–92.
-
Zaifer, Ahmet 2018, ‘Variegated Privatisation: Class, Capital Accumulation and State in Turkey’s Privatisation Process in the 1980s and 1990s’, Critical Sociology, 46, 1: 1–16.
State–Bourgeoisie Relations under Neoliberalism with Turkish Characteristics
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Umut Bozkurt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article aims to analyse state–bourgeoisie relations in the era of AKP-rule in Turkey, with a specific focus on the 2018 economic crisis. It will discuss the following question: How did the AKP regime position itself with respect to the interests of the first- and second-generation bourgeoisie? Especially after 2010, the AKP was criticised for carrying out an extra-economic intervention in the sphere of accumulation as well as providing benefits to the Islamic second-generation bourgeoisie. This article draws on a Marxist conceptualisation of the state which underlines that the state’s autonomy from the economy is limited because its continued existence depends on the reproduction of accumulation, hence its need to intervene. However, the state cannot implement a unified interventionist strategy because it needs to maintain links with different groups of bourgeoisie as well as the proletariat. The article’s main argument is that the AKP struggled to balance the divergent interests of the first- and second-generation bourgeoisie and implemented policies that may be characterised as incoherent and contradictory. These contradictory policies also played an important role in the 2018 economic crisis.
