Phenomenology, Scientific Method and the Transformation Problem
In: Historical MaterialismAbstract
We argue in this article that Marx’s scientific method coupled with his analysis of the phenomenological consciousness of agents trapped within the capitalist mode of production provides a sufficient solution to the transformation problem. That is, Marx needs no amending – mathematical, philosophical, or otherwise – and the tools he uses to demonstrate and resolve the problem – science and phenomenology – were already clearly spelled out in his texts. Critics of Marx either fail to understand his scientific method, or are themselves trapped within a non-scientific capitalist phenomenology. Similarly, Marxists that mathematically resolve the transformation problem fail to realise that Marx’s scientific analysis alone demonstrates that a mathematical solution to the transformation problem is a misapprehension of the relation between Marx’s abstract theory and concrete phenomena. Consequently, we also criticise the monetary theorists who try to dismiss the problem as pointless by claiming that Marx was not a pre-monetary theorist.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Althusser, Louis and Étienne Balibar 2009 [1965], Reading Capital, translated by Ben Brewster, London: Verso.
-
Aristotle 1932, Politics, translated by H. Rackham, Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.
-
Aristotle 1934, Nicomachean Ethics, translated by H. Rackham, Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library.
-
Baragar, F. 2003, ‘Joan Robinson on Marx’, Review of Political Economy, 15, 4: 467–482.
-
Byron, Christopher C. 2020, A New Reading of Marx’s Theory of Exploitation: Assessment and Defense, doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.
-
Byron, Christopher C., Alan Freeman and Andrew Kliman 2015, ‘Physicalism and the Exploitation Theory of Profit are Incompatible’, in Is Marx’s Theory of Profit Right? The Simultaneist–Temporalist Debate, edited by Nick Potts and Andrew Kliman, New York: Lexington Books.
-
Cain, Mark J. 2016, The Philosophy of Cognitive Science, Malden, MA: Polity Press.
-
Callinicos, Alex 2014, Deciphering Capital, London: Bookmarks Publications.
-
Cartwright, Nancy 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
-
Fodor, Jerry 1983, The Modularity of Mind, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
-
Foley, Duncan K. 1982, ‘The Value of Money, the Value of Labor Power and the Marxian Transformation Problem’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 14, 2: 37–47, <https://doi.org/10.1177%2F048661348201400204>.
-
Foley, Duncan K. 1986, Understanding Capital: Marx’s Economic Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
Heinrich, Michael 2012, An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx’s Capital, translated by Alexander Locascio, New York: Monthly Review Press.
-
Kliman, Andrew 2007, Reclaiming Marx’s Capital: A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, New York: Lexington Books.
-
Koyré, Alexandre 1943, ‘Galileo and Plato’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 4, 4: 400–428, <https://doi.org/10.2307/2707166>.
-
Lopes, Jesse 2020, Computational Foundations of Phenomenology, doctoral dissertation, Boston University.
-
Marx, Karl 1990, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume One, translated by Ben Fowkes, New York: Penguin.
-
Marx, Karl 1993, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Volume Three, translated by David Fernbach, New York: Penguin.
-
Mattick Jr., Paul 2018, Theory as Critique: Essays on Capital, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Milios, John, Dimitri Dimoulis and George Economakis 2018, Karl Marx and the Classics: An Essay on Value, Crises and the Capitalist Mode of Production, London: Routledge.
-
Moseley, Fred 2016, Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in Capital and the End of the ‘Transformation Problem’, Historical Materialism Book Series, Chicago: Haymarket Books.
-
Ricardo, David 2004, The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Mineola, NY: Dover Books.
-
Smith, Adam 1994, The Wealth of Nations, New York: Modern Library.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 122 | 122 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 10 | 10 | 3 |
Phenomenology, Scientific Method and the Transformation Problem
In: Historical MaterialismAbstract
We argue in this article that Marx’s scientific method coupled with his analysis of the phenomenological consciousness of agents trapped within the capitalist mode of production provides a sufficient solution to the transformation problem. That is, Marx needs no amending – mathematical, philosophical, or otherwise – and the tools he uses to demonstrate and resolve the problem – science and phenomenology – were already clearly spelled out in his texts. Critics of Marx either fail to understand his scientific method, or are themselves trapped within a non-scientific capitalist phenomenology. Similarly, Marxists that mathematically resolve the transformation problem fail to realise that Marx’s scientific analysis alone demonstrates that a mathematical solution to the transformation problem is a misapprehension of the relation between Marx’s abstract theory and concrete phenomena. Consequently, we also criticise the monetary theorists who try to dismiss the problem as pointless by claiming that Marx was not a pre-monetary theorist.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 122 | 122 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 5 | 5 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 10 | 10 | 3 |