Sartre’s Engagement with Hegel and Trotsky
The Ends and Means of Revolutionary Socialism from Notebooks for an Ethics Onwards
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Emmanuel Barot in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Being and Nothingness argues that in the master–slave dialectic Hegel had a ‘brilliant insight’ contra solipsism, to the effect that each self-consciousness depends on other consciousnesses. Against Hegel, however, Sartre claims that the separation of the for-itself remains an insurmountable ‘scandal’ and that collectivity can at best exist as a ‘de-totalised totality’, never as Subject. In a confrontation with Hegelian Sittlichkeit, Notebooks for an Ethics extends this analysis to the historical modalities of the mutual recognition of freedoms. A ‘concrete ethics’ must be ‘revolutionary socialist’, centrally concerned with ‘the dialectic of the ends and means of revolution’. Finally, Sartre’s analysis of the dialectic of society and the state in the Critique of Dialectical Reason explains why sovereignty can never be the embodiment of an imaginary Subject. Sartre thus ultimately occupies a highly distinctive middle ground between Hegel’s Philosophy of Right and Marx’s critique of Hegel. A fulcrum of the argument, focused on Notebooks for an Ethics, consists in a comparison between Sartre and Trotsky’s Their Morals and Ours.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Barot, Emmanuel 2011a, Marx au pays des soviets ou les deux visages du communisme, Montreuil: La Ville Brûle.
-
Barot, Emmanuel (ed.) 2011, Sartre et le marxisme, Paris: La Dispute.
-
Basso, Lelio 2016, Inventare il nuovo. Storia e politica in Jean-Paul Sartre, Verona: Ombre Corte.
-
Bensaïd, Daniel 2010 [1991], Walter Benjamin, sentinelle messianique: À la gauche du possible, Paris: Les Prairies Ordinaires.
-
Birchall, Ian H. 2004, Sartre against Stalinism, New York: Berghahn Books.
-
Birchall, Ian H. 2011, ‘Sartre, Trotsky et le trotskysme’, in Barot (ed.) 2011, pp. 61–79.
-
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1991 [1820], Elements of the Philosophy of Right, edited by Allen W. Wood, translated by H.B. Nisbet, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 2009 [1822–1823], La Philosophie de l’histoire, edited by Myriam Bienenstock, Paris: Librairie Générale Française.
-
Marcuse, Herbert 1972 [1948], ‘Sartre’s Existentialism’, in From Luther to Popper: Studies in Critical Philosophy, translated by Joris de Bres, London: New Left Books.
-
Marcuse, Herbert 1990 [1932], Hegel’s Ontology and the Theory of Historicity, translated by Seyla Benhabib, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
-
Marx, Karl 1975 [1927], ‘Contribution to the Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law’, in Marx/Engels Collected Works, Volume 3, Marx/Engels 1844–45, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
-
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1960 [1957], Questions de méthode, in Critique de la raison dialectique, Volume 1, Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
-
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1976 [1960], Critique of Dialectical Reason, Volume 1, translated by Alan Sheridan-Smith, edited by Jonathan Rée, London: New Left Books.
-
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1992 [1983], Notebooks for an Ethics, translated by David Pellauer, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
-
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1993 [1947], ‘Aller et retour’, in Critiques littéraires (Situations I), Paris: Éditions Gallimard.
-
Sartre, Jean-Paul 2000 [1938], Nausea, translated by Robert Baldick, London: Penguin.
-
Sartre, Jean-Paul 2005, ‘Morale et histoire’, Les Temps modernes, 632, 633 & 634.
-
Sartre, Jean-Paul 2016a [2013], What Is Subjectivity?, translated by David Broder and Trista Selous, London: Verso.
-
Sartre, Jean-Paul 2016b, ‘Les racines de l’éthique’, Études sartriennes, 19: 11–18.
-
Sartre, Jean-Paul 2018 [1943], Being and Nothingness: An Essay in Phenomenological Ontology, translated by Sarah Richmond, London: Routledge.
-
Trotsky, Leon 1970 [1936], The Third International after Lenin, translated by John G. Wright, New York: Pathfinder Press.
-
Trotsky, Leon 2011 [1973], Their Morals and Ours: The Class Foundations of Moral Practice, New York: Pathfinder Press.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 796 | 166 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 60 | 11 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 161 | 34 | 5 |
Sartre’s Engagement with Hegel and Trotsky
The Ends and Means of Revolutionary Socialism from Notebooks for an Ethics Onwards
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Emmanuel Barot in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Being and Nothingness argues that in the master–slave dialectic Hegel had a ‘brilliant insight’ contra solipsism, to the effect that each self-consciousness depends on other consciousnesses. Against Hegel, however, Sartre claims that the separation of the for-itself remains an insurmountable ‘scandal’ and that collectivity can at best exist as a ‘de-totalised totality’, never as Subject. In a confrontation with Hegelian Sittlichkeit, Notebooks for an Ethics extends this analysis to the historical modalities of the mutual recognition of freedoms. A ‘concrete ethics’ must be ‘revolutionary socialist’, centrally concerned with ‘the dialectic of the ends and means of revolution’. Finally, Sartre’s analysis of the dialectic of society and the state in the Critique of Dialectical Reason explains why sovereignty can never be the embodiment of an imaginary Subject. Sartre thus ultimately occupies a highly distinctive middle ground between Hegel’s Philosophy of Right and Marx’s critique of Hegel. A fulcrum of the argument, focused on Notebooks for an Ethics, consists in a comparison between Sartre and Trotsky’s Their Morals and Ours.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 796 | 166 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 60 | 11 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 161 | 34 | 5 |