Democratic Autocracy: a Populist Update to Fascism under Neoliberal Conditions
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Cihan Tuğal in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
What are the social dynamics behind the rise and resilience of today’s authoritarian regimes? This paper seeks to answer this question by focusing on the longest lasting elected autocracy of our era, the AKP (Justice and Development Party) regime in Turkey. Building on the authoritarian neoliberalism literature’s criticism of the scholarship on competitive authoritarianism, I point out the seeds of authoritarianism in the pro-market reforms of the 1980s–2000s. However, both literatures fail to address the popular embrace of authoritarianism. In critical engagement with analyses of fascism, I develop the concept ‘democratic autocracy’: a parliamentarised, individualised, personalistic, and relatively more market-oriented, twenty-first century version of fascism. The democratic autocracy in Turkey organises and mobilises the people through parties, youth and aid associations, paramilitary organisations, and unions. However, both unresolved economic crises and democratic autocracy’s sociopolitical dynamics set limits to its resilience, as well as to the sustainability of its parliamentarism.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Akça, İsmet 2014, ‘Hegemonic Projects in Post-1980 Turkey and the Changing Forms of Authoritarianism’, in Turkey Reframed: Constituting Neoliberal Hegemony, edited by İsmet Akça, Ahmet Bekmen and Barış Alp Özden, London: Pluto Press.
-
Akçay, Ümit 2021, ‘Authoritarian Consolidation Dynamics in Turkey’, Contemporary Politics, 27, 1: 79–104.
-
Altınörs, Görkem and Ümit Akçay 2022, ‘Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Crisis, and Consolidation: The Political Economy of Regime Change in Turkey’, Globalizations, 19, 7: 1029–1053.
-
Antonini, Francesca 2020, Caesarism and Bonapartism in Gramsci: Hegemony and the Crisis of Modernity, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Arslanalp, Mert and Tülay Deniz Erkmen 2023, ‘Spatial Reason of the State: The Role of Space in Protest Repression in Turkey’, Territory, Politics, Governance, 11, 5: 915–933.
-
Balaban, Utku 2021, ‘The Islamist Businessman’, 7 September, available at: <https://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/43292>.
-
Bashirov, Galib and Caroline Lancaster 2018, ‘End of Moderation: The Radicalization of akp in Turkey’, Democratization, 25, 7: 1210–1230.
-
Bilgiç, Ali 2018, ‘Reclaiming the National Will: Resilience of Turkish Authoritarian Neoliberalism After Gezi’, South European Society and Politics, 23, 2: 259–280.
-
Botz, Gerhard 1976, ‘Austro-Marxist Interpretation of Fascism’, Journal of Contemporary History, 11, 4: 129–156.
-
Bozkurt, Umut 2013, ‘Neoliberalism with a Human Face: Making Sense of the Justice and Development Party’s Neoliberal Populism in Turkey’, Science & Society, 77, 3: 372–396.
-
Bozkurt-Güngen, Sümercan 2018, ‘Labour and Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Changes and Continuities under the akp Government in Turkey’, South European Society and Politics, 23, 2: 219–238.
-
Bruff, Ian 2016, ‘Neoliberalism and Authoritarianism’, in The Routledge Handbook of Neoliberalism, edited by Simon Springer, Kean Birch and Julie MacLeavy, London: Routledge.
-
Buğra, Ayşe and Çağlar Keyder 2006, ‘The Turkish Welfare Regime in Transformation’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 3: 211–228.
-
Çalışkan, Koray 2018, ‘Toward a New Political Regime in Turkey: From Competitive Toward Full Authoritarianism’, New Perspectives on Turkey, 58: 5–33.
-
Carney, Josh 2019, ‘Projecting “New Turkey” Deflecting the Coup: Squares, Screens, and Publics at Turkey’s “Democracy Watches”’, Media, Culture & Society, 41, 1: 138–148.
-
Carver, Terrell 2004, ‘Marx’s Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte: Democracy, Dictatorship, and the Politics of Class Struggle’, in Dictatorship in History and Theory: Bonapartism, Caesarism, and Totalitarianism, edited by Peter Baehr and Melvin Richter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Castaldo, Antonino 2018, ‘Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in Turkey’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 18, 4: 467–487.
-
Chacko, Priya 2018, ‘The Right Turn in India: Authoritarianism, Populism and Neoliberalisation’, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 48, 4: 541–565.
-
Colas, Alejandro 2004, ‘The Re-Invention of Populism: Islamist Responses to Capitalist Development in the Contemporary Maghreb’, Historical Materialism, 12, 4: 231–260.
-
de Leon, Cedric, Manali Desai and Cihan Tuğal (eds.) 2015, Building Blocs: How Parties Organize Society, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
-
Diamond, Larry 2002, ‘Thinking about Hybrid Regimes’, Journal of Democracy, 13, 2: 21–35.
-
dİsk-ar 2019, Sendikalaşma Araştırması: Türkiye’de Sendikalaşma, Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Kapsamı ve Grevler (2013–2019), DİSK Araştırma Dairesi, February, available at: <https://disk.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Sendikalasma-Arastirmasi.pdf>.
-
Doğan, Sevinç 2016, Mahalledeki AKP: Parti İşleyişi, Taban Mobilizasyonu ve Siyasal Yabancılaşma, Istanbul: İletişim.
-
Dorlach, Tim 2016, ‘The akp between Populism and Neoliberalism: Lessons from Pharmaceutical Policy’, New Perspectives on Turkey, 55: 55–83.
-
Draper, Hal 1977, Karl Marx’s Theory of Revolution. Volume 1: State and Bureaucracy, New York: Monthly Review Press.
-
Dülffer, Jost 1976, ‘Bonapartism, Fascism and National Socialism’, Journal of Contemporary History, 11, 4: 109–128.
-
Duran, Burhanettin and Engin Yıldırım 2005, ‘Islamism, Trade Unionism and Civil Society’, Middle Eastern Studies, 41, 2: 227–247.
-
Eder, Mine 2010, ‘Retreating State? Political Economy of Welfare Regime Change in Turkey’, Middle East Law and Governance, 2, 2: 152–184.
-
Erdinç, Işıl 2014, ‘akp Döneminde Sendikal Alanın Yeniden Yapılanması ve Kutuplaşma: Hak-İş ve Ötekiler’, Çalışma ve Toplum, 2: 155–174.
-
Erdoğan, Necmi 1998, ‘Demokratik Soldan Devrimci Yol’a: 1970’lerde Sol Popülizm Üzerine Notlar’, Toplum ve Bilim, 78: 22–36.
-
Esen, Berk 2021, ‘Neoliberal Kelimesi Tedavülden Kalksa, Bir Gecede Cahil Kalacak Akademisyenler Var: Berk Esen’le Neoliberalizm Tartışmaları Üzerine Söyleşi’, available at: <https://birikimdergisi.com/guncel/10420/neoliberal-kelimesi-tedavulden-kalksa-bir-gecede-cahil-kalacak-akademisyenler-var>.
-
Esen, Berk and Şebnem Gümüşçü 2016, ‘Rising Competitive Authoritarianism in Turkey’, Third World Quarterly, 37, 9: 1581–1606.
-
Esen, Berk and Şebnem Gümüşçü 2021, ‘Why Did Turkish Democracy Collapse? A Political Economy Account of akp’s Authoritarianism’, Party Politics, 27, 6: 1075–1091.
-
Finchelstein, Federico 2017, From Fascism to Populism in History, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
-
Fontana, Benedetto 2004, ‘The Concept of Caesarism in Gramsci’, in Dictatorship in History and Theory: Bonapartism, Caesarism, and Totalitarianism, edited by Peter Baehr and Melvin Richter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Garrido, Marco 2019, The Patchwork City: Class, Space, and Politics in Metro Manila, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Gehring, Axel 2018, ‘Eine Rückkehr des Bonapartismus in der Türkei? Das akp-Regime im Kontext der Historischen Kräfteverhältnisse’, in Die Neuen Bonapartisten: Mit Marx den Aufstieg von Trump & Co. Verstehen, edited by Martin Beck and Ingo Stützle, Berlin: Dietz.
-
Hadiz, Vedi 2016, Islamic Populism in Indonesia and the Middle East, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Hewison, Kevin 2010, ‘Thaksin Shinawatra and the Reshaping of Thai Politics, Contemporary Politics, 16, 2: 119–133.
-
İhh Araştırma Yayınlar Birimi 2011, Mavi Marmara: Gazze Özgürlük Filosu, Istanbul: İhh Kitap.
-
imf 2023, World Economic Outlook: A Rocky Delivery, Washington, D.C.: imf Publication Services.
-
Janover, Louis and Maximilien Rubel 2023, Armée – Guerre – Nation: Lexique Marx – III, Toulouse: Smolny.
-
Jayasuriya, Kanishka 2020, ‘The Rise of the Right: Populism and Authoritarianism in Southeast Asian Politics’, Southeast Asian Affairs, SEAA, 20, 1: 43–56.
-
Kadıoğlu, Ayşe 2016, ‘Coup d’état Attempt: Turkey’s Reichstag Fire?’, openDemocracy, 16 July, available at: <https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/coup-d-tat-attempt-turkey-s-reichstag-fire/>.
-
Karahasanoğulları, Yiğit 2012, ‘Neo-liberal Popülizm: 2002–2010 Kamu Maliyesi, Finans, Dış Ticaret Dengesi ve Siyaset’, Toplum ve Bilim, 123: 116–145.
-
Kaygusuz, Özlem 2018, ‘Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Regime Security in Turkey: Moving to an “Exceptional State” under akp’, South European Society and Politics, 23, 2: 281–302.
-
Kitchen, Martin 1973, ‘August Thalheimer’s Theory of Fascism’, Journal of the History of Ideas, 34, 1: 67–78.
-
Kitchen, Martin 1976, Fascism, London: Macmillan.
-
Konya, Nazlı 2021, ‘Making a People: Turkey’s “Democracy Watches” and Gezi-Envy’, Political Theory, 49, 5: 828–855.
-
Kor, Zahide Tuba 2011, Witnesses of the Freedom Flotilla: Interviews with Passengers, Istanbul: İhh Kitap.
-
Küçük, Bülent and Buket Türkmen 2020, ‘Remaking the Public through the Square: Invention of the New National Cosmology in Turkey’, British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 47, 2: 247–263.
-
Kumral, Şefika 2023, ‘Globalization, Crisis and Right-Wing Populists in the Global South: The Cases of India and Turkey’, Globalizations, 20, 5: 752–781.
-
Kutlay, Mustafa 2020, ‘The Politics of State Capitalism in a Postliberal International Order: The Case of Turkey, Third World Quarterly, 41, 4: 683–706.
-
Laclau, Ernesto 1977, Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory: Capitalism, Fascism, Populism, London: nlb.
-
Leonard, Spencer A. 2023, Marx and Engels on Bonapartism: Selected Journalism, 1851–1859, Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
-
Levitsky, Steven and James Loxton 2013, ‘Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in the Andes’, Democratization, 20, 1: 107–136.
-
Levitsky, Steven and Lucan Way 2010, Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War, New York: Cambridge University Press.
-
Marx, Karl 1978 [1852], ‘The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte’, in The Marx–Engels Reader, edited by Robert C. Tucker, New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
-
Morgül, Kerem 2019, ‘Performing Revolutionary Populism: The Revolutionary Path Movement in Turkey’, Qualitative Sociology, 42: 273–297.
-
Öktem, Kerem and Karabekir Akkoyunlu 2016, ‘Exit from Democracy: Illiberal Governance in Turkey and Beyond’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16, 4: 469–480.
-
Öniş, Ziya and Mustafa Kutlay 2021, ‘The Anatomy of Turkey’s New Heterodox Crisis: The Interplay of Domestic Politics and Global Dynamics’, Turkish Studies, 22, 4: 499–529.
-
Özbudun, Ergun 2014, ‘akp at the Crossroads: Erdoğan’s Majoritarian Drift’, South European Society and Politics, 19, 2: 155–167.
-
Poulantzas, Nicos 1979 [1970], Fascism and Dictatorship: The Third International and the Problem of Fascism, London: Verso.
-
Riley, Dylan 2010, The Civic Foundations of Fascism in Europe: Italy, Spain, and Romania 1870–1945, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
-
Riley, Dylan 2017, ‘American Brumaire?’, New Left Review, II, 103: 21–32.
-
Riley, Dylan 2018, ‘Foreword’, in Poulantzas 1979.
-
Rodan, Garry and Kanishka Jayasuriya 2012, ‘Hybrid Regimes: A Social Foundations Approach’, in Routledge Handbook of Democratization, edited by Jeffrey Haynes, London: Routledge.
-
Rubel, Maximilien 1994, ‘Karl Marx devant le Bonapartisme’, in Karl Marx: Le Luttes de Classes en France, Paris: Gallimard.
-
Saad-Filho, Alfredo 2020, ‘Varieties of Neoliberalism in Brazil (2003–2019)’, Latin American Perspectives, 47, 1: 9–27.
-
Schedler, Andreas 2002, ‘Elections Without Democracy: The Menu of Manipulation’, Journal of Democracy, 13, 2: 36–50.
-
Scheiring, Gábor 2020, The Retreat of Liberal Democracy: Authoritarian Capitalism and the Accumulative State in Hungary, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
-
Sözen, Yunus 2019, ‘Populist Peril to Democracy: The Sacralization and Singularization of Competitive Elections’, Political Studies Review, 17, 3: 267–283.
-
Streeck, Wolfgang 2017 [2014], Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism, London: Verso.
-
Tansel, Cemal Burak 2017, ‘Authoritarian Neoliberalism: Towards a New Research Agenda’, in States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order, Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
-
Tansel, Cemal Burak 2018, ‘Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Democratic Backsliding in Turkey: Beyond the Narratives of Progress’, South European Society and Politics, 23, 2: 197–217.
-
Tansel, Cemal Burak 2019, ‘Reproducing Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Turkey: Urban Governance and State Restructuring in the Shadow of Executive Centralization’, Globalizations, 16, 3: 320–335.
-
Thalheimer, August 1979 [1930], ‘On Fascism’, Telos, 40: 109–122.
-
Trotsky, Leon 1971 [1934/1940], The Struggle Against Fascism in Germany, New York: Pathfinder.
-
Trotsky, Leon 2004 [1936], The Revolution Betrayed, New York: Dover Publications.
-
Tuğal, Cihan 2009, Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
-
Tuğal, Cihan 2017, Caring for the Poor: Islamic and Christian Benevolence in a Liberal World, London: Routledge.
-
Tuğal, Cihan 2021a, ‘Can a Disoriented Storming of the Center Lead to Organizational Maturity?’, New Politics, 71, 3: 43–48.
-
Tuğal, Cihan 2021b, ‘Populism Studies: The Case for Theoretical and Comparative Reconstruction’, Annual Review of Sociology, 47: 327–347.
-
Tuğal, Cihan 2022, ‘The Strengths and Limits of Neoliberal Populism: The Statism and Mass Organisation of Contemporary Rightwing Regimes’, Contemporary Politics, 28, 5: 611–634.
-
Tuğal, Cihan 2023, ‘Politicized Megaprojects and Public Sector Interventions: Mass Consent under Neoliberal Statism’, Critical Sociology, 49, 3: 457–473.
-
Tuğal, Cihan 2024, ‘Can the Turkish Regime Absorb the Opposition to Israel’s War?’, Noria Research, 13 March, available at: <https://noria-research.com/mena/can-the-turkish-regime-absorb-the-opposition-to-israels-war/#_ftnref21>.
-
Vahapzade, Abdolreza 1987, A Theory of Bonapartism, PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
-
Wiegel, Gerd 2018, ‘Analoge, aber nicht Identische Phänomene: Bonapartismustheoretische Ansätze zur Erklärung des Historischen Faschismus’, in Die Neuen Bonapartisten: Mit Marx den Aufstieg von Trump & Co. Verstehen, edited by Martin Beck and Ingo Stützle, Berlin: Dietz.
-
Wilks, Andrew 2023, ‘Murder of Former Grey Wolves Leader Divides Turkey’s Nationalists’, Al-Monitor, 25 January, available at: <https://www.al-monitor.com/originals/2023/01/murder-former-grey-wolves-leader-divides-turkeys-nationalists>.
-
Yabanci, Bilge 2016, ‘Populism as the Problem Child of Democracy: The akp’s Enduring Appeal and the Use of Meso-level Actors’, Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16, 4: 591–617.
-
Yağcı, Mustafa 2018, ‘The Political Economy of Central Banking in Turkey: The Macroprudential Policy Regime and Self-Undermining Feedback’, South European Society and Politics, 23, 4: 525–545.
-
Yilmaz, Gözde and Nilgün Eliküçük Yıldırım 2020, ‘Authoritarian Diffusion or Cooperation? Turkey’s Emerging Engagement with China’, Democratization, 27, 7: 1202–1220.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 5079 | 3151 | 226 |
| Full Text Views | 296 | 182 | 21 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 691 | 405 | 39 |
Democratic Autocracy: a Populist Update to Fascism under Neoliberal Conditions
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Cihan Tuğal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
What are the social dynamics behind the rise and resilience of today’s authoritarian regimes? This paper seeks to answer this question by focusing on the longest lasting elected autocracy of our era, the AKP (Justice and Development Party) regime in Turkey. Building on the authoritarian neoliberalism literature’s criticism of the scholarship on competitive authoritarianism, I point out the seeds of authoritarianism in the pro-market reforms of the 1980s–2000s. However, both literatures fail to address the popular embrace of authoritarianism. In critical engagement with analyses of fascism, I develop the concept ‘democratic autocracy’: a parliamentarised, individualised, personalistic, and relatively more market-oriented, twenty-first century version of fascism. The democratic autocracy in Turkey organises and mobilises the people through parties, youth and aid associations, paramilitary organisations, and unions. However, both unresolved economic crises and democratic autocracy’s sociopolitical dynamics set limits to its resilience, as well as to the sustainability of its parliamentarism.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 5079 | 3151 | 226 |
| Full Text Views | 296 | 182 | 21 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 691 | 405 | 39 |
