Phenomenology, Scientific Method and the Transformation Problem

In: Historical Materialism
Authors: Jesse Lopes1 and Chris Byron2
View More View Less
  • 1 Sometime Lecturer, Department of Philosophy, Boston UniversityBoston, MassachusettsUnited States of America
  • | 2 Lecturer, Snead State Community CollegeBoaz, AlabamaUnited States of America
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



We argue in this article that Marx’s scientific method coupled with his analysis of the phenomenological consciousness of agents trapped within the capitalist mode of production provides a sufficient solution to the transformation problem. That is, Marx needs no amending – mathematical, philosophical, or otherwise – and the tools he uses to demonstrate and resolve the problem – science and phenomenology – were already clearly spelled out in his texts. Critics of Marx either fail to understand his scientific method, or are themselves trapped within a non-scientific capitalist phenomenology. Similarly, Marxists that mathematically resolve the transformation problem fail to realise that Marx’s scientific analysis alone demonstrates that a mathematical solution to the transformation problem is a misapprehension of the relation between Marx’s abstract theory and concrete phenomena. Consequently, we also criticise the monetary theorists who try to dismiss the problem as pointless by claiming that Marx was not a pre-monetary theorist.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 361 361 57
Full Text Views 16 16 7
PDF Views & Downloads 45 45 19