Religion and Diplomacy

in The Hague Journal of Diplomacy
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Many flashpoints of violence and conflict around the world involve religious actors both as part of the crisis and potentially part of the solution. Until recently, however, states have been slow to see a role for religion in diplomacy. In this article, which is taken from a lecture that he delivered to the London Academy of Diplomacy, the author explores the notion of faith-based diplomacy and delineates the characteristics of a faith-based diplomat. The argument is that a religious view of the world functions as a Gestalt through which events and data in the public arena are filtered. The faith-based diplomat is one whose religious knowledge and skills allow the diplomat to decode the religious rhetoric by which crises are often articulated. As in the case of Northern Ireland, peace has a chance when the rhetoric is decoded and when local religious actors are party to the diplomatic process.

Religion and Diplomacy

in The Hague Journal of Diplomacy

Sections

References

2

Keith E. YandellPhilosophy of Religion (London: Routledge1999) p. 16.

3

BeyerReligion in Global Society p. 106.

5

YandellPhilosophy of Religion p. 16.

6

BeyerReligion in Global Society p. 80.

7

BeyerReligion in Global Society p. 82.

9

Smith‘Gestalt Theory’ p. 42.

11

BeyerReligion in Global Society p. 106.

13

Patricia R. Hill‘Religion as a Category of Diplomatic Analysis’Diplomatic Historyvol. 24 no. 4 (fall 2000) p. 633.

14

Douglas Johnston (ed.)Faith-based Diplomacy: Trumping Realpolitik (Oxford: Oxford University Press2003) p. 3.

16

JohnstonFaith-based Diplomacy p. 7.

18

JohnstonFaith-based Diplomacy p. 4.

20

BeyerReligions in Global Society p. 300.

21

JohnstonFaith-based Diplomacy p. 8.

23

JohnstonFaith-based Diplomacy pp. 16-17. Johnston’s original terms — (1) dependence on spiritual values; (2) spiritual authority; (3) pluralistic heart; (4) transcendent approach; (5) perseverance — have been modified to three virtues that would be transferable into other religious frameworks.

24

Livingstone ThompsonA Protestant Theology of Religious Pluralism (Oxford: Peter Lang2009) p. 80.

25

Gavin D’CostaThe Meeting of Religions and the Trinity (Edinburgh: T&T Clark2000) p. 28.

27

RahnerFoundations of the Christian Faith p. 22.

28

MizunoEssentials of Buddhism p. 165.

30

Hill‘Religion as a Category of Diplomatic Analysis’ p. 633. In light of these complexities Hill argues for a culturalist approach which would include religion as one category. It would seem however that awareness of religious pluralism is a much more specific and manageable approach.

33

ThompsonA Protestant Theology of Religious Pluralism p. 2.

35

ThompsonA Protestant Theology of Religious Pluralism p. 8.

36

ThompsonA Protestant Theology of Religious Pluralism p. 9.

40

Joseph Ruane and Jennifer Todd‘Path Dependence in Settlement Process: Explaining Settlement in Northern Ireland’Political Studiesvol. 55 (2007) p. 448.

Figures

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 43 43 14
Full Text Views 73 73 41
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0