Structural Analysis to Measure the Influence of Think Tanks’ Networks in the Digital Era

in The Hague Journal of Diplomacy
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Ideas fuel power, giving means, understanding and arguments to the public sphere. Think tanks are the most influential actors in creating and disseminating such ideas in the field of international relations. This article analyses the networks of relations among think tanks in order better to understand their nature and the ways in which they operate in a global reality, organized by geographical areas. The research method is by structural analysis, using raw data collected on Twitter. Most of the think tanks selected are those categorized by the gotothinktank.com study. The main conclusions are that English is the predominant language, that geography still matters in influencing ideas and that us-based think tanks lead the social media conversation.

Structural Analysis to Measure the Influence of Think Tanks’ Networks in the Digital Era

in The Hague Journal of Diplomacy

Sections

References

1

Juan Luis Manfredi-Sánchez‘Taxonomía de la diplomacia digital en la agenda de las nuevas relaciones internacionales’Historia y Comunicación Socialvol. 19 (2014) pp. 341-354.

2

Manuel Castells‘Communication, Power and Counter-Power in the Network Society’ International Journal of Communicationvol. 1 (2007) pp. 238-266.

3

Anne-Marie Slaughter‘Power in the Networked Century’Foreign Affairs (January-February 2009) pp. 99-100.

6

Sieglinde Gstöhl‘Diplomacy in the 21st Century is Network Diplomacy’Crossroadsvol. iii no. 2 (2012) p. 55.

9

Juan Luis Manfredi-Sánchez‘Hacia una teoría comunicativa de la diplomacia pública’Communication and Societyvol. 24 no. 2 (2011) pp. 150-166.

10

Cristina Archetti‘The Impact of New Media on Diplomatic Practice: An Evolutionary Model of Change’The Hague Journal of Diplomacyvol. 7 no. 2 (2012) p. 193.

13

Susan StrangeStates and Markets (London: Pinter1988).

15

Brooke Williams‘Influence Incognito’Edmond J. Safra Working Papersno. 3 (2013).

16

Alfred Hermida‘Power Plays in Social Media’Social Media + Societynos. 1-2 (2015) p. 2.

22

James G. McGann and Erik C. JohnsonComparative Think Tanks Politics and Public Policy (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar2005).

24

Thomas MedvetzThink Tanks as an Emergent Field (New York: Social Science Research Council2008).

29

Seth C. Lewis‘Journalism in an Era of Big Data: Cases, Concepts, and Critiques’Digital Journalismvol. 3 no. 3 (2015) pp. 1-10.

30

Sandra González-Bailón‘Social Science in the Era of Big Data’Policy & Internetvol. 5 no. 2 (2013) pp. 147-160.

31

David Karpf‘Social Science Research Methods in Internet Time’ Information Communication & Societyvol. 15 no. 5 (2012) pp. 639-661.

33

Askar Akaev and Vladimir Pantin‘Technological Innovations and Future Shifts in International Politics’International Studies Quarterlyvol. 58 no. 4 (2014) pp. 867-872.

34

Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen‘The Digital Disruption: Connectivity and the Diffusion of Power’Foreign Affairsvol. 89 (2010) pp. 75-85.

35

Cull‘The Long Road to Public Diplomacy 2.0’ pp. 123-139.

38

José Manuel Noguera Vivo‘How Open are Journalists on Twitter?: Trends towards the End‐user Journalism’Communication & Societyvol. 26 no. 1 (2013) pp. 93-114.

39

Maxwell McCombs and Donald Shaw‘The Agenda-setting Function of Mass Media’Public Opinion Quarterlyvol. 36 no. 2 (1972) pp. 176-187.

42

Miguel González‘Doscientos expertos sientan las bases de un consenso en política exterior’El País (24 February 2014).

43

Ignacio Molina‘Hacia una renovación estratégica de la política exterior española’Informe Elcano no. 15 (Madrid: Real Instituto Elcano 2015) available online at http://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/wcm/connect/ec53e280430c03c1a760afc959dd21c2/InformeElcano15_PolExtEspana.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=ec53e280430c03c1a760afc959dd21c2.

51

Leo A. Goodman‘Snowball Sampling’Annals of Mathematical Statisticsvol. 32 no. 1 (1961) pp. 148-170.

Figures

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 18 18 11
Full Text Views 12 12 12
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0