Wikipedia: Medium and Model of Collaborative Public Diplomacy

In: The Hague Journal of Diplomacy
View More View Less
  • 1 Department of International Relations, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
  • 2 Department of Media and Communication, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Public diplomacy is an inherently social endeavour, engaging public audiences at home and abroad to shape perceptions and influence foreign policy outcomes. Social media has a part to play in this, with sites such as Facebook and Twitter gaining visibility and traction as ‘must-have’ tools for public diplomacy 2.0. This article casts light on the less visible but pervasive social media platform of Wikipedia. Taking a case-study approach, the article posits that Wikipedia holds a dual relevance for public diplomacy 2.0: first as a medium; and second, as a model for public diplomacy’s evolving process. Exploring Wikipedia’s folksonomy, crowd-sourced through intense and organic collaboration, provides insights into the potential of collective agency and symbolic advocacy. The article’s findings highlight the limitations within current approaches towards public diplomacy 2.0, and offer new approaches for public diplomacy’s more progressive agenda.

  • 3

    john r. kelley, ‘the new diplomacy: evolution of a revolution’, diplomacy & statecraft, vol. 21, no. 2 (june 2010), p. 289; see also melissen, ‘public diplomacy’, pp. 192-207.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4

    bruce gregory, ‘american public diplomacy: enduring characteristics, elusive transformation’, the hague journal of diplomacy, vol. 6, no. 3-4 (2011), p. 353.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 11

    evgeny morozov, ‘iran: the downside to the twitter revolution’, dissent (fall 2009), pp. 10-14; golnaz esfandiari, ‘the twitter devolution’, foreign policy (8 june 2010); malcolm gladwell, ‘small change’, the new yorker (4 october 2010); philip seib, real-time diplomacy: politics and power in the social media era (new york, ny: palgrave macmillan, 2012); and peter van ham, ‘social power in public diplomacy’, in rhonda zaharna, ali fisher and amelia arsenault (eds), connective mindshift: relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy (london: routledge, 2013), pp. 17-28.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14

    causey and howard, ‘delivering digital public diplomacy’, p. 150; sean aday, henry farrell, marc lynch, john sides and deen freelon, ‘blogs and bullets ii: new media and conflict after the arab spring’, peaceworks (washington, dc: united states institute of peace, july 2012); seib, real-time diplomacy; and fergus hanson, revolution at state: the spread of e-diplomacy (sydney, nsw: lowy institute for international policy analysis, march 2012), p. 17.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 15

    bjola and jiang, ‘social media and public diplomacy’, p. 71.

  • 17

    causey and howard, ‘delivering digital public diplomacy’, p. 145.

  • 18

    seib, real-time diplomacy, p. 9.

  • 19

    manuel castells, ‘the new public sphere: global civil society, communication networks and global governance’, annals of the american academy of political and social science, no. 616 (march 2008), p. 91.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20

    melissen, ‘public diplomacy’, p. 201.

  • 26

    geoffrey cowan and amelia arsenault, ‘moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: the three layers of public diplomacy’, the annals of the american academy of political and social science, no. 616 (2008), p. 26.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28

    fuchs, social media, p. 48.

  • 31

    alireza noruzi, ‘folksonomies: (un)controlled vocabulary?’ knowledge organization, vol. 33, no. 4 (2006), p. 199.

  • 32

    bruns, blogs, wikipedia, second life, and beyond, p. 195.

  • 37

    stacey schiff, ‘know it all: can wikipedia conquer expertise?’, the new yorker (31 july 2006), available online at http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2006/07/31/know-it-all.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38

    in bruns, blogs, wikipedia, second life, and beyond, p. 109.

  • 52

    elliott, ‘stigmergic collaboration’, p. 11.

  • 61

    jimmy wales, ‘wikipedia founder jimmy wales responds’, slashdot (28 july 2004), available online at http://slashdot.org/story/04/07/28/1351230/wikipedia-founder-jimmy-wales-responds.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65

    dan murphy, ‘monmouth: where it all started to go wrong’, wikipediocracy (2012), available online at http://wikipediocracy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=926.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66

    melissa jones, ‘monmouthpedia could bring wikipedia to chepstow’, south wales argus (24 july 2012), available online at http://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/news/9832698.monmouthpedia_could_bring_wikipedia_effect_to_chepstow.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 77

    waleed aly, ‘one armenia, many wikipedia articles’, australian broadcasting corporation, radio national (4 august 2014), online at: http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/drive/one-armenia2c-many-wikipedia-articles/5647654.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 86

    bjola and jiang, ‘social media and public diplomacy’, p. 73. see also stuart murray, ‘evolution not revolution: the digital divide in american and australian contexts’, in corneliu bjola and marcus holmes (eds), digital diplomacy: theory and practice (new york, ny: routledge, 2015), pp. 127-144.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 92

    o’reilly, ‘what is web 2.0?’, p. 38.

  • 95

    jim macnamara, ‘public communication practices in the web 2.0-3.0 mediascape: the case for prevolution’, prism, vol. 7, no. 3 (2010), p. 3, available online at http://www.prismjournal.org.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 96

    geoffrey cowan and amelia arsenault, ‘moving from monologue to dialogue to collaboration: the three layers of public diplomacy’, annals of the american academy of political and social science, vol. 616, no. 1 (march 2008), p. 22.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 97

    zaharna, fisher and arsenault (eds), connective mindshift, p. 7.

  • 98

    zaharna, fisher and arsenault (eds), connective mindshift, p. 8.

  • 99

    anne-marie slaughter, ‘a new theory for the foreign policy frontier: collaborative power’, the atlantic (30 november 2011), available online at http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/11/a-new-theory-for-the-foreign-policy-frontier-collaborative-power/249260/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 102

    van ham, ‘social power in public diplomacy’, p. 18.

  • 104

    melissen, ‘public diplomacy’, p. 192 [emphasis added].

  • 106

    rosen, ‘the people formerly known as the audience’, p. 15.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 435 207 17
Full Text Views 240 8 0
PDF Views & Downloads 15 3 0