This article presents a rhetorical critique of diplomatic and public discourse that emanated from a joint commitment of the United States and India to pursue full civilian nuclear cooperation. The article argues that four narratives combined to transform the us–India relationship from estrangement to engagement. The narratives of exceptionalism, kinship, sojourning and convergence changed perspectives on the context, social order and substance of the us–India relationship, effectuating India’s movement from outside to inside the nuclear non-proliferation regime, and constituting the United States and India as strategic partners.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Schaffer, India and the United States in the 21st Century, p. 16.
Rajesh M. Basrur, ‘Nuclear Weapons and Indian Strategic Culture’, Journal of Peace Research, vol. 38, no. 2 (2001), p. 183.
Gerald A. Hauser, ‘The Moral Vernacular of Human Rights Discourse’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, vol. 41, no. 4 (2008), p. 441.
Hauser, ‘The Moral Vernacular of Human Rights Discourse’, p. 456.
Jonathan Charteris-Black, Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), p. 74.
Charteris-Black, Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis, p. 95.
Stephen H. Browne, ‘Samuel Danforth’s “Errand into the Wilderness” and Discourse of Arrival in Early American Culture’, Communication Quarterly, vol. 40, no. 2 (spring 1992), p. 92.
Ajay Gandhi, ‘The Indian Diaspora in Global Advocacy’, Global Networks, vol. 2, no. 2 (2002), p. 360.
Amit Kumar Gupta, ‘Commentary on India’s Soft Power and Diaspora’, International Journal on World Peace, vol. 25, no. 3 (September 2008), p. 62.
Sanjay Chaturvedi, ‘Diaspora in India’s Geopolitical Visions: Linkages, Categories and Contestations’, Asian Affairs, vol. 32, no. 3 (2005), pp. 141–168; and Walter Anderson, ‘The Indian–American Community Comes into its Political Own’, India Abroad (1 September 2006).
Pablo Shiladitya Bose, ‘Home and Away: Diasporas, Developments and Displacements in a Globalizing World’, Journal of International Studies, vol. 29, no. 1 (February 2008), p. 114.
Rafiq Dossani, ‘Indian Soft Power and Associations of the American Diaspora’, p. 6, full text downloaded from http://aparc.stanford.edu (accessed on 20 October 2010).
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 193 | 27 | 3 |
Full Text Views | 198 | 10 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 43 | 15 | 0 |
This article presents a rhetorical critique of diplomatic and public discourse that emanated from a joint commitment of the United States and India to pursue full civilian nuclear cooperation. The article argues that four narratives combined to transform the us–India relationship from estrangement to engagement. The narratives of exceptionalism, kinship, sojourning and convergence changed perspectives on the context, social order and substance of the us–India relationship, effectuating India’s movement from outside to inside the nuclear non-proliferation regime, and constituting the United States and India as strategic partners.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 193 | 27 | 3 |
Full Text Views | 198 | 10 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 43 | 15 | 0 |