Private Think Tanks and Public–Private Partnerships in Chinese Public Diplomacy

In: The Hague Journal of Diplomacy
Li Li Zhou Enlai Diplomatic Studies Center, China Foreign Affairs University Xicheng District, Beijing 100037 People’s Republic of China

Search for other papers by Li Li in
Current site
Google Scholar
Xuefei Chen Department of Diplomacy, China Foreign Affairs University Beijing 100037 People’s Republic of China

Search for other papers by Xuefei Chen in
Current site
Google Scholar
, and
Elizabeth C. Hanson Political Science Department, University of Connecticut (UConn) U-1024 Storrs, CT 06269-1024 United States

Search for other papers by Elizabeth C. Hanson in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



This article examines private think tanks as instruments of public diplomacy in China. It analyses relationship-building in three cases of a hybrid form of public diplomacy that combines government agencies and non-state actors and involves multiple stakeholders, both domestic and transnational. Emphasis is upon the actors in China that initiated the projects and developed the networks for each initiative, but the building of the projects’ transnational relationships is also considered. The cases involve three top-ranking Chinese private think tanks: the Charhar Institute’s City Diplomacy projects; the Center for China and Globalization’s Green Card initiative; and the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies’ Think 20 Transnational Network. The analysis demonstrates how and why the public-private partnerships in each case produced shared positive outcomes with synergistic results and advanced China’s public diplomacy objectives. The cases illustrate the advantages of a hybrid form of non-state public diplomacy that combines state and non-state actors.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1513 196 15
Full Text Views 160 23 1
PDF Views & Downloads 213 39 3