Hashtagging Justice: Digital Diplomacy and the International Criminal Court on Twitter
In: The Hague Journal of DiplomacySearch for other papers by David Eichert in
Current site
Google Scholar
Summary
This article uses qualitative content analysis to understand how the International Criminal Court (ICC) uses Twitter by building on digital diplomacy literature to assess the different narratives promoted by the ICC online. I find that the ICC is actively creating narratives that position it as part of a unified global fight for justice with wide political support from states and other international organisations. This kind of public diplomacy is unique among criminal courts, with tweets aimed at bolstering political support from both elite diplomats and non-elite lay publics. At the same time, however, this rebranding effort often oversteps the ICC’s limited jurisdiction, reducing complex legal topics to short, emotionally resonant phrases that fit within Twitter’s restricted format. While the Court still attempts to portray its work as politically neutral and objective, the diplomatic messaging of its Twitter account sends a different message about the Court’s social media agenda.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Adesina, Olubukola S. ‘Foreign Policy in an Era of Digital Diplomacy’. Cogent Social Sciences 3 (1) (2017), 1-13.
-
Anzera, Giuseppe, Giovanna Gianturco and Alessandra Massa. ‘Security Branding and Digital Narrations: Security Issues Representation on Twitter’. International Review of Sociology 29 (1) (2019), 80-101.
-
Aronczyk, Melissa. Branding the Nation: The Global Business of National Identity (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
-
Ba, Oumar. States of Justice: The Politics of the International Criminal Court (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).
-
Berents, Helen. ‘Hashtagging Girlhood: #IAmMalala, #BringBackOurGirls and Gendering Representations of Global Politics’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 18 (4) (2016), 513-527.
-
Bexell, Magdalena, Kristina Jönsson and Nora Stappert. ‘Whose Legitimacy Beliefs Count? Targeted Audiences in Global Governance Legitimation Processes’. Journal of International Relations and Development (online first) (2020), 1-26.
-
Bjola, Corneliu and Lu Jiang. ‘Social Media and Public Diplomacy: A Comparative Analysis of the Digital Diplomatic Strategies of the EU, US and Japan in China’. In Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, eds. Corneliu Bjola and Marcus Holmes (New York: Routledge, 2015), 71-88.
-
Bjola, Corneliu and Ilan Manor. ‘Revisiting Putnam’s Two-Level Game Theory in the Digital Age: Domestic Digital Diplomacy and the Iran Nuclear Deal’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 31 (1) (2018), 3-32.
-
Bjola, Corneliu and Ilan Manor. ‘NATO’s Digital Public Diplomacy during the Covid-19 Pandemic’. Turkish Policy Quarterly 19 (2) (2020), 77-87.
-
Bjola, Corneliu and Ruben Zaiotti. ‘Going Digital: Choices and Challenges for International Organisations’. In Digital Diplomacy and International Organisations: Autonomy, Legitimacy and Contestation, eds. Corneliu Bjola and Ruben Zaiotti (New York: Routledge, 2021), 1-19.
-
Borger, Julian. ‘Trump Targets ICC with Sanctions after Court Opens War Crimes Investigation’. The Guardian, 11 June 2020. http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jun/11/trump-icc-us-war-crimes-investigation-sanctions.
-
Bos, Michèle and Jan Melissen. ‘Rebel Diplomacy and Digital Communication: Public Diplomacy in the Sahel’. International Affairs 95 (6) (2019), 1331-1348.
-
Bosco, David L. Rough Justice: The International Criminal Court in a World of Power Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
-
Bullingham, Liam and Ana C. Vasconcelos. ‘‘The Presentation of Self in the Online World’: Goffman and the Study of Online Identities’. Journal of Information Science 39 (1) (2013), 101-112.
-
Chaikel, Danya. ‘ICC Prosecutor Symposium: The Next ICC Prosecutor Must Embody Integrity in the #MeToo Era’. Opinio Juris, 16 April 2020. http://opiniojuris.org/2020/04/16/icc-prosecutor-symposium-the-next-icc-prosecutor-must-embody-integrity-in-the-metoo-era/.
-
Clarke, Kamari Maxine. Affective Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Pan-Africanist Pushback (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2019).
-
Clarke, Kamari Maxine and Sarah-Jane Koulen. ‘The Legal Politics of the Article 16 Decision: The International Criminal Court, the UN Security Council and Ontologies of a Contemporary Compromise’. African Journal of Legal Studies 7 (2014), 297-319.
-
Cohen, Harlan Grant et al. ‘Legitimacy and International Courts: A Framework’. In Legitimacy and International Courts, eds. Nienke Grossman et al. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018), 1-40.
-
Crilly, Rhys and Louise Pears. ‘‘No, We Don’t Know Where Tupac Is’: Critical Intelligence Studies and the CIA on Social Media’. Intelligence and National Security (online first) (2021), 1-16.
-
Daigle, Megan and Henri Myrttinen. ‘Bringing Diverse Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) into Peacebuilding Policy and Practice’. Gender & Development 26 (1) (2018), 103-120.
-
De Hoon, Marieke. ‘The Future of the International Criminal Court: On Critique, Legalism and Strengthening the ICC’s Legitimacy’. International Criminal Law Review 17 (4) (2017), 591-614.
-
Dederke, Julian. Contestation, Politicization, and the CJEU’s Public Relations Toolbox: Judgments of the Court of Justice of the EU in their Public and Political Context (Zurich: ETH Zurich Research Collection, 2020). https://doi.org/10.3929/ETHZ-B-000415266.
-
Dobson, Jillian. ‘Handshakes and Hashtags in the ICC’. In Backstage Practices of Transnational Law, eds. Lianne J. M. Boer and Sofia Stolk (New York: Routledge, 2019), 13-31.
-
Dobson, Jillian and Sofia Stolk. ‘The Prosecutor’s Important Announcements: The Communication of Moral Authority at the International Criminal Court’. Law, Culture and the Humanities 16 (3) (2016), 391-410.
-
Duncombe, Constance. ‘Digital Diplomacy: Emotion and Identity in the Public Realm’. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 14 (1-2) (2019), 102-116.
-
Eichert, David. ‘‘Homosexualization’ Revisited: An Audience-Focused Theorization of Wartime Male Sexual Violence’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 21 (3) (2019), 409-433.
-
Elo, Satu and Helvi Kyngäs. ‘The Qualitative Content Analysis Process’. Journal of Advanced Nursing 62 (1) (2008), 107-115.
-
Engle, Karen. ‘Anti-Impunity and the Turn to Criminal Law in Human Rights’. Cornell Law Review 100 (2015), 1069-1128.
-
Faizullaev, Alisher. ‘Symbolic Insult in Diplomacy’. Brill Research Perspectives in Diplomacy and Foreign Policy 2 (4) (2017), 1-116.
-
Garbett, Claire. ‘The International Criminal Court and Restorative Justice: Victims, Participation and the Processes of Justice’. Restorative Justice 5 (2) (2017), 198-220.
-
Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (New York: Doubleday, 1959).
-
Graneheim, Ulla H., Britt-Marie Lindgren and Berit Lundman. ‘Methodological Challenges in Qualitative Content Analysis: A Discussion Paper’. Nurse Education Today 56 (2017), 29-34.
-
Grey, Rosemary. Prosecuting Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes at the International Criminal Court: Practice, Progress and Potential (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).
-
Gutierrez, Jason. ‘Philippines Officially Leaves the International Criminal Court’. The New York Times, 17 March 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/17/world/asia/philippines-international-criminal-court.html.
-
Halley, Janet. ‘Rape at Rome: Feminist Interventions in the Criminalization of Sex-Related Violence in Positive International Criminal Law’. Michigan Journal of International Law 30 (2008), 1-116.
-
Hamer, Lynne, Morris Jenkins and Bradene Moore. ‘Toward a Cultural Framework for Dialogue about Justice’. Journal of Black Studies 44 (4) (2013), 356-375.
-
Hogan, Bernie. ‘The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions Online’. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30 (6) (2010), 377-386.
-
Hsieh, Hsiu-Fang and Sarah E. Shannon. ‘Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis’. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9) (2005), 1277-1288.
-
Jeiranashvili, Nika. ‘The Georgian Experience: A Story of How the ICC is Failing Victims in Its First Case Outside Africa’. International Justice Monitor, 10 May 2018. https://www.ijmonitor.org/2018/05/the-georgian-experience-a-story-of-how-the-icc-is-failing-victims-in-its-first-case-outside-africa/.
-
Kendall, Sara. ‘Commodifying Global Justice: Economies of Accountability at the International Criminal Court’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 13 (1) (2015), 113-134.
-
Kendall, Sara and Sarah Nouwen. ‘Representational Practices at the International Criminal Court: The Gap between Juridified and Abstract Victimhood’. Law and Contemporary Problems 76 (3) (2014), 235-262.
-
Labuschagne, Adri. ‘Qualitative Research: Airy Fairy or Fundamental?’ The Qualitative Report 8 (1) (2003), 100-103.
-
Lake, Milli May. Strong NGOs and Weak States: Pursuing Gender Justice in the Democratic Republic of Congo and South Africa (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018).
-
Lankina, Tomila V., Kohei Watanabe and Yulia Netesova. ‘How Russian Media Control, Manipulate and Leverage Public Discontent: Framing Protest in Autocracies’. In Citizens and the State in Authoritarian Regimes: Comparing China and Russia, eds. Karrie J. Koesel, Valerie J. Bunce and Jessica Chen Weiss (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 137-164.
-
McCammon, Muira. ‘Tweeted, Deleted: An Exploratory Study of the US Government’s Digital Memory Holes’. New Media & Society (online first) (2020), 1-19.
-
Manor, Ilan. The Digitalization of Public Diplomacy. (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).
-
Manor, Ilan and Rhys Crilley. ‘Visually Framing the Gaza War of 2014: The Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Twitter’. Media, War & Conflict 11 (4) (2018), 369-391.
-
Manor, Ilan and James Pamment. ‘Towards Prestige Mobility? Diplomatic Prestige and Digital Diplomacy’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 32 (2) (2019), 93-131.
-
Manor, Ilan and Elad Segev. ‘America’s Selfie: How the US Portrays Itself on Its Social Media Accounts’. In Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, eds. Corneliu Bjola and Marcus Holmes (New York: Routledge, 2015), 89-108.
-
Marwick, Alice E. and danah boyd. ‘I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience’. New Media & Society 13 (1) (2011), 114-133.
-
Meger, Sara. ‘The Fetishization of Sexual Violence in International Security’. International Studies Quarterly 60 (1) (2016), 149-159.
-
Melissen, Jan. ‘Public Diplomacy’. In The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, eds. Andrew E. Cooper, Jorge Heine and Ramesh Thakur (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013), 298-311.
-
Morse, Janice M. et al. ‘Verification Strategies for Establishing Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research’. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1 (2) (2002), 13-22.
-
Moyn, Samuel. ‘Anti-Impunity as Deflection of Argument’. In Anti-Impunity and the Human Rights Agenda, eds. Karen Engle, Zinaida Miller and D. M. Davis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 68-94.
-
Murthy, Dhiraj. ‘Towards a Sociological Understanding of Social Media: Theorizing Twitter’. Sociology 46 (6) (2012), 1059-1073.
-
Nouwen, Sarah and Wouter Werner. ‘Doing Justice to the Political: The International Criminal Court in Uganda and Sudan’. European Journal of International Law 21 (4) (2011), 941-965.
-
Nouwen, Sarah and Wouter Werner. ‘Monopolizing Global Justice: International Criminal Law as Challenge to Human Diversity’. Journal of International Criminal Justice 13 (1) (2015), 157-176.
-
Omar Bali, Ahmed, Mahdi Sofi Karim and Kardo Rached. ‘Public Diplomacy Effort across Facebook: A Comparative Analysis of the U.S. Consulate in Erbil and the Kurdistan Representation in Washington’. SAGE Open 8 (1) (2018), 1-9.
-
Pashakhanlou, Arash Heydarian. ‘Fully Integrated Content Analysis in International Relations’. International Relations 31 (4) (2017), 447-465.
-
Payne, Gregory, Efe Sevin and Sara Bruya. ‘Grassroots 2.0: Public Diplomacy in the Digital Age’. Comunicação Pública 6 (10) (2011), 45-70.
-
Rigney, Sophie. ‘Postcard from the ICTY’. In International Law’s Objects, eds. Jessie Hohmann and Daniel Joyce (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 366-376.
-
Sander, Barrie. ‘International Criminal Justice as Progress: From Faith to Critique’. In Historical Origins of International Criminal Law, vol. 4, eds. Morten Bergsmo et al. (Brussels: Torkel Opsahl, 2015), 749-835.
-
Schreier, Margrit. ‘Qualitative Content Analysis’. In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, ed. Uwe Flick (London: SAGE Publications, 2014), 170-183.
-
Schwöbel-Patel, Christine. ‘The Rule of Law as a Marketing Tool: The International Criminal Court and the Brand of Global Justice’. In Handbook on the Rule of Law, eds. Christopher May and Adam Winchester (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018), 434-452.
-
Schwöbel-Patel, Christine. Marketing Global Justice: The Political Economy of International Criminal Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020).
-
Schwöbel-Patel, Christine and Wouter Werner. ‘Screen’. In International Law’s Objects, eds. Jessie Hohmann and Daniel Joyce (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), 419-430.
-
Sevin, Efe. ‘Pathways of Connection: An Analytical Approach to the Impacts of Public Diplomacy’. Public Relations Review 41 (2015), 562-568.
-
Smith, K’Shaani O. ‘How the International Criminal Court Failed the Women and Girls of the Congo’. Howard Law Journal 54 (2011), 467-500.
-
Sotiriu, Sabrina. ‘Digital Diplomacy: Between Promises and Reality’. In Digital Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, eds. Corneliu Bjola and Marcus Holmes (New York: Routledge, 2015), 33-51.
-
Squatrito, Theresa. ‘Judicial Diplomacy: International Courts and Legitimation’. Review of International Studies (online first) (2020), 1-21.
-
Tallberg, Jonas and Michael Zürn. ‘The Legitimacy and Legitimation of International Organizations: Introduction and Framework’. Review of International Organizations 14 (4) (2019), 581-606.
-
Vasiliev, Sergey. ‘The Crises and Critiques of International Criminal Justice’. In The Oxford Handbook of International Criminal Law, eds. Kevin Jon Heller et al. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020), 626-651.
-
Voeten, Erik. ‘Public Opinion and the Legitimacy of International Courts’. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 14 (2) (2013), 411-436.
-
Wright, Katharine A. M. ‘Telling NATO’s Story of Afghanistan: Gender and the Alliance’s Digital Diplomacy’. Media, War & Conflict 12 (1) (2019), 87-101.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1330 | 307 | 45 |
| Full Text Views | 189 | 22 | 6 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 400 | 53 | 16 |
Hashtagging Justice: Digital Diplomacy and the International Criminal Court on Twitter
In: The Hague Journal of DiplomacySearch for other papers by David Eichert in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
This article uses qualitative content analysis to understand how the International Criminal Court (ICC) uses Twitter by building on digital diplomacy literature to assess the different narratives promoted by the ICC online. I find that the ICC is actively creating narratives that position it as part of a unified global fight for justice with wide political support from states and other international organisations. This kind of public diplomacy is unique among criminal courts, with tweets aimed at bolstering political support from both elite diplomats and non-elite lay publics. At the same time, however, this rebranding effort often oversteps the ICC’s limited jurisdiction, reducing complex legal topics to short, emotionally resonant phrases that fit within Twitter’s restricted format. While the Court still attempts to portray its work as politically neutral and objective, the diplomatic messaging of its Twitter account sends a different message about the Court’s social media agenda.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1330 | 307 | 45 |
| Full Text Views | 189 | 22 | 6 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 400 | 53 | 16 |
