This article compares two central pillars of China’s space programme and observes that Chinese space diplomacy is not uniform regarding international scientific co-operation either in its approaches or in results. In the case of the Chinese Space Station programme, the China National Space Administration went through existing United Nations (UN) channels and successfully attracted international partners. However, the International Lunar Research Station has avoided UN channels and used national and bilateral platforms. This bifurcation in approaches and results offers an intriguing puzzle concerning international co-operation: practices of institutionalised multilateral co-operation and areas of state-centric bilateral co-operation co-exist in this case and further complicate the issue of space diplomacy. To propose a potential explanation, it is argued here that a crucial intermediate variable — institutional density — requires further theorising, as it seems to influence strategic choices about space diplomacy, which may lead to success or failure.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Alter, Karen and Sophie Meunier. ‘The Politics of International Regime Complexity’. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1) (2009), 13-24. DOI 10.1017/S1537592709090033.
Aoki, Setsuko. ‘Domestic Legal Conditions for Space Activities in Asia’. American Journal of International Law 113 (2019), 69-84. DOI 10.1017/aju.2019.14.
Baiocchi, Dave and William Welser. ‘The Democratization of Space: New Actors Need New Rules’. Foreign Affairs 94 (3) (2015), 98-104.
Benabdallah, Lina. ‘Contesting the International Order by Integrating It: The Case of China’s Belt and Road Initiative’. Third World Quarterly 40 (1) (2019), 92-108. DOI 10.1080/01436597.2018.1529539.
Besha, Patrick. ‘Policy Making in China’s Space Program: A History and Analysis of the Chang’s Lunar Orbiter Project’. Space Policy 26 (4) (2010), 214-221. DOI 10.1016/j.spacepol.2010.08.005.
Bobylev, Sergei. ‘Space Chief to Discuss Co-operation on Moon with China by End of May’. TASS Russian News Agency, 29 May 2022. https://tass.com/science/1445167.
Brittingham, Bryon C. ‘Does the World Really Need New Space Law’. Oregon Review of International Law 12 (2010), 36-39.
CMS (China Manned Space Engineering Office). ‘Tiangong-1 Has Fully Completed Various In-Orbit Test Tasks and Officially Terminated Data Services’. 21 March 2016. http://www.cmse.gov.cn/xwzx/yzjz/201603/t20160321_45028.html.
CMS. ‘Tiangong-2 Space Lab Successfully Launched’. 15 September 2016. http://www.cmse.gov.cn/ztbd/xwzt/kjsysfxrw/rwdt/201609/t20160915_39695.html.
CNSA (China National Space Administration). ‘Joint Statement on the ILRS中国国家航天局和俄罗斯国家航天集团公司关于合作建设国际月球科研站的联合声明’. 29 April 2021a. http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n6758823/n6758840/c6811963/content.html.
CNSA. ‘International Lunar Research Station (ILRS) Guide for Partnership’. 16 June 2021b. http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465652/n6465653/c6812150/content.html.
CNSA. ‘China and Russia Hosted Workshop on ILRS中俄联合举行国际月球科 研站合作研讨会’. 27 September 2021c. http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n6758823/n6758838/c6812549/content.html.
CNSA. ‘CNSA Invited Diplomats to ILRS Workshop in Zhuhai 国家航天局邀请多国驻华使节参加2021珠海论坛和第十三届中国国际航空航天博览会系列活动’. 30 September 2021d. http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n6758823/n6758838/c6812665/content.html.
CNSA. ‘Wu Yanhua, Deputy Administrator of the National Space Administration, and Al-Mari, Director of the Rashid Space Center in the United Arab Emirates, signed a co-operation agreement on lunar exploration 国家航天局副局长吴艳华与阿联酋拉希德航天中心主任艾尔马里签署探月合作协议’. 17 September 2022a. http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/n6758823/n6758838/c6840898/content.html.
CNSA. ‘Announcement of Opportunity Solicitating for Payloads onboard Chang’E-7 Mission’. 2022b. http://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465652/n6465653/c6840870/part/6797907.pdf.
Cordesman, Anthony H. ‘Chinese Space Strategy and Developments’. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), 2016. http://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/publication/160819_Chinese_Space_Strategy_Developments.pdf.
Daniels, Mathew. ‘The History and Future of US China Competition and Co-operation in Space’. Defense Technical Information Center, November 2020. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/AD1116894.
Dawson, Linda. The Politics and Perils of Space Exploration: Who Will Compete, Who Will Dominate? (London: Springer Nature, 2020), 1-24.
de Goede, Marieke and Carola Westermeier. ‘Infrastructural Geopolitics’. International Studies Quarterly 66(3) (2022), sqac033.
Dolman, Everett C. Astropolitik: Classical Geopolitics in the Space Age (London: Routledge, 2001). DOI 10.4324/9780203016640.
Fan, Jie. ‘Adaptative Strategy of Powerful Country of Science and Technology for Modernization of China’s Space Governance’. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Chinese Version) 35 (5) (2020), 564-575. DOI 10.16418/j.issn.1000-3045.20200502001.
Flink, Tim and Ulrich Schreiterer. ‘Science Diplomacy at the Intersection of S&T Policies and Foreign Affairs: Toward a Typology of National Approaches’. Science and Public Policy 37 (9) (2010), 665-677. DOI 10.3152/030234210X12778118264530.
Freeland, Steven. ‘Peaceful Purposes? Governing the Military Uses of Outer Space’. European Journal of Law Reform 18 (1) (2016), 35-51. DOI 10.5553/EJLR/138723702016018001003.
Galliott, Jai. Commercial Space Exploration: Ethics, Policy and Governance (London: Routledge, 2016).
Gangale, Thomas. The Development of Outer Space: Sovereignty and Property Rights in International Space Law (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2009).
Goswami, Namrata. ‘China in Space: Ambitions and Possible Conflict’. Strategic Studies Quarterly 12 (1) (2018), 74-97.
Gronau, Jennifer and Henning Schmidtke. ‘The Quest for Legitimacy in World Politics — International Institutions’ Legitimation Strategies’. Review of International Studies 42 (3) (2015), 535-557. DOI 10.1017/S0260210515000492.
Grove, Stephen. ‘Interpreting Article II of the Outer Space Treaty’. Fordham Law Review 37 (1968), 349-351.
Gui, Qinchang, Chengliang Liu and Debin Du. ‘Globalization of Science and International Scientific Collaboration: A Network Perspective’. Geoforum 105 (2019), 1-12.
Guo, Huadong and Ji Wu. ‘Development Strategy and Roadmap for Space Science, Applications and Technology to 2050’. In Space Science & Technology in China: A Roadmap to 2050, eds. Huadong Guo and Ji Wu (Berlin: Springer, 2010).
Hannan, Michael and Glenn Carroll. Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Legitimation, and Competition (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992).
He, Qisong. ‘China’s Space Power Strategy in the New Era’. Asian Perspective 45 (4) (2021), 785-807. DOI 10.1353/apr.2021.0041.
He, Qizhi. ‘The Outer Space Treaty in Perspective’. Journal of Space Law 25 (1997), 93-101.
Hickman, John. ‘Research Viewpoint: International Relations and the Second Space Race between the United States and China’. Astropolitics 17 (3) (2019), 178-190.
Hobe, Stephan. Space Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 2019).
Hong, Yang. ‘The “Tiangong” Chinese Space Station Project’. Frontiers 2 (2018), 278-283. DOI 10.15302/J-FEM-2018202.
Howse, Robert and Ruti Teitel. ‘Beyond Compliance: Rethinking Why International Law Really Matters’. Global Policy 1 (2) (2010), 127-136.
Hunter, Cameron. ‘The Forgotten First Iteration of the “Chinese Space Threat” to US National Security’. Space Policy 47 (2019), 158-165. DOI 10.1016/j.spacepol.2018.11.003.
IAF (International Astronautical Federation). ‘Road Map for Creation of the International Lunar Research Station’. 16 June 2021. https://www.iafastro.org/events/global-series-conferences/glex-2021/plenary-programme/wednesday-16-june-2021/road-map-for-creation-of-the-international-research-lunar-station.html.
Iliopoulos, Nikolaos and Beta Miguel Esteban. ‘Sustainable Space Exploration and Its Relevance to the Privatization of Space Ventures’. Acta Astronautica 167 (2020), 85-92. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.09.037.
Israel, Brian. ‘Space Governance 3.0’. Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law 48 (2019), 715-730.
Jakhu Ram S. and Joseph Pelton. ‘Overview of the Existing Mechanisms of Global Space Governance’. In Global Space Governance: An International Study, eds. Ram Jakhu and Joseph Pelton (Berlin: Springer, 2017), 15-63.
Johnson-Freese, Joan. ‘China’s Space Ambitions: It’s Not All About the U.S’. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 15 (1) (2014), 139-148.
Johnson-Freese, Joan. ‘Build on the Outer Space Treaty’. Nature 550 (7675) (2017), 182-184.
Johnston, Iain Alastair. ‘Is China a Status Quo Power?’. International Security 27 (4) (2003), 6-8.
Jones, Andrew. ‘China Seeks New Partners for Lunar and Deep Space Exploration’. SpaceNews, 28 September 2022. https://spacenews.com/china-seeks-new-partners-for-lunar-and-deep-space-exploration/.
Keohane, Robert. ‘The Demand for International Regimes’. International Organization 36 (2) (1982), 325-355. DOI 10.1017/S002081830001897X.
Keohane, Robert O. ‘International Institutions: Two Approaches’. International Studies Quarterly 32 (4) (1988), 379-396.
Keohane, Robert O. ‘Institutions: Can Interdependence Work?’. Foreign Policy 110 (1998), 82-194. DOI 10.2307/1149278.
Khan, Zulfqar and Ahmad Khan. ‘Chinese Capabilities as a Global Space Power’. Astropolitics 13 (3) (2015), 238-239. DOI 10.1080/14777622.2015.1084168.
Kojima, Ayami, Daniel GarcíaYárnoz and Simonetta Di Pippo. ‘Access to Space: A New Approach by the United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs’. Acta Astronautica 152 (2018), 201-207. DOI 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.07.041.
Koremenos, Barbara, Charles Lipson and Duncan Snidal. ‘The Rational Design of International Institutions’. International Organization 55 (2001), 761-799. DOI 10.1162/002081801317193592.
Kostenko, Inesa. ‘Current Problems and Challenges in International Space Law: Legal Aspects’. Advanced Space Law 5(1) (2020), 48-57. https://doi.org/10.29202/asl/2020/5/5.
Krepon, Michael, Eric Hagt, Shen Dingli, Bao Shixiu, Michael Pillsbury and Ashley Tellis. ‘China’s Military Space Strategy: An Exchange’. Survival 50 (1) (2008), 157-198. DOI 10.1080/00396330801899512.
Kulacki, Gregory and Jeffrey G. Lewis. ‘Understanding China’s Antisatellite Test’. The Nonproliferation Review 15 (2) (2008), 335-347. DOI 10.1080/10736700802117346.
Kyriakopoulos, George. ‘Positive Space Law and Privatization of Outer Space: Fundamental Antinomies’. The Space Treaties at Crossroads (Cham: Springer, 2019), 1-13. DOI 10.1007/978-973-030-01479-7_1.
Leib, Karl. ‘State Sovereignty in Space: Current Models and Possible Futures’. Astropolitics 13 (1) (2015), 1-24. DOI 10.1080/14777622.2015.1015112.
Li, Chunlai, Chi Wang, Yong Wei and Yangting Lin. ‘China’s Present and Future Lunar Exploration Program’. Science 365 (6450) (2019), 238-239. DOI 10.1126/science.aax9908.
Lin, Sen. ‘Building a Dream in “Heavenly Palace” | The Aging of the International Space Station is Intensifying, and Where Will the Future Space Station of the United States Go?’ The Paper 澎湃新闻, 4 May 2021. https://m.thepaper.cn/renmin_prom.jsp?contid=12518023.
Lin, Xu, Yongliao Zou and Jia Yingzhou. ‘China’s Planning for Deep Space Exploration and Lunar Exploration before 2030’. Chinese Journal of Space Science 38 (5) (2018),591-592. DOI 10.11728/cjss2018.05.591.
Listner, Michael. ‘The Ownership and Exploitation of Outer Space: A Look at Foundational Law and Future Legal Challenges to Current Claims’. Regent Journal of International Law 1 (2003), 75-88.
Ma, Xinmin. ‘The Development of Space Law: Framework, Objectives and Orientations’. Speech at United Nations/China/APSCO Workshop on Space Law, 17 November 2014. https://www.unoosa.org/documents/pdf/spacelaw/activities/2014/splaw2014-keynote.pdf.
Mayer, Maximilian and Michele Acuto. ‘The Global Governance of Large Technical Systems’. Millennium 43 (2) (2015), 660-683.
Meyer, Zach. ‘Private Commercialization of Space in an International Regime: A Proposal for a Space District’. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 30 (1) (2010), 241-261.
Migaud, Michael R., Robert A. Greer and Justin B. Bullock. ‘Developing an Adaptive Space Governance Framework’. Space Policy 55 (2021). DOI 10.1016/j.spacepol.2020.101400.
Moltz, James. ‘China, the United States, and Prospects for Asian Space Co-operation’. Journal of Contemporary China 20 (68) (2011a), 69-87. DOI 10.1080/10670564.2011.520847.
Moltz, James. Asia’s Space Race: National Motivations, Regional Rivalries, and International Risks (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011b).
NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). ‘NASA’s Lunar Exploration Program Overview’. September 2020. https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/artemis_plan-20200921.pdf.
Paliouras, Zachos. ‘The Non-Appropriation Principle: The Grundnorm of International Space Law’. Leiden Journal of International Law 27 (1) (2014), 37-54. DOI 10.1017/S0922156513000630.
Pekkanen, Saadia M. ‘Governing the New Space Race’. American Journal of International Law 113 (2019), 92-97. DOI 10.1017/aju.2019.16.
Pollpeter, Kevin. ‘China’s Space Program: Making China Strong, Rich, and Respected’. Asia Policy 27 (2) (2020), 12-18.
Qiu, Bingqing and Zhe Hu. ‘China and Russia Made an Announcement Regarding the ILRS中俄发布关于合作建设国际月球科研站的联合声明’. Xinhua, 4 April 2021. http://www.xinhuanet.com/2021-04/24/c_1127369152.htm.
Rathbun, Brian C. Trust in International Co-operation: International Security Institutions, Domestic Politics and American Multilateralism, vol. 121 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).
Raustiala, Kal. ‘Institutional Proliferation and the International Legal Order’. In Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art, eds. Jeffrey L. Dunoff and Mark A. Pollack (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), 293-320.
Riddervold, Marriane and Akasemi Newsome. ‘Introduction: Co-operation, Conflict, and Interaction in the Global Commons’. International Relations 35 (3) (2021), 365-383. DOI 10.1177/00471178211036598.
See, Eng Teong. ‘Commercialization of Space Activities — The Laws and Implications’. Journal of Air Law and Commerce 82 (2017), 145-153.
Snidal, Duncan. ‘Coordination versus Prisoners’ Dilemma: Implications for International Co-operation and Regimes’. American Political Science Review 79 (4) (1985), 923-965. DOI 10.2307/1956241.
Snidal, Duncan. ‘International Co-operation among Relative Gains Maximizer’. International Studies Quarterly 35 (4) (1991), 387-402. DOI 10.2307/2600947.
Solomon, Lewis D. The Privatization of Space Exploration: Business, Technology, Law and Policy (London: Routledge, 2017).
Solomone, Stacy. China’s Strategy in Space (New York: Springer, 2013).
State Department of China. ‘China and Russia Signed ILRS Mou 中俄两国签署合作建设国际月球科研站谅解备忘录’. 9 March 2021. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-03/09/content_5591869.htm.
Stein, Arthur A. ‘Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World’. International Organization 36 (2) (1982), 299-324. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2706524.
Stein, Arthur A. ‘Constrained Sovereignty: The Growth of International Intrusiveness’. In The New Great Power Coalition: Toward a World Concert of Nations, ed. Richard N. Rosecrance (New York: Rowman and Littlefield, 1994), 261-281.
Stovpets, Oleksandr and Denys Svyrydenko. ‘Chinese Perspectives in the “Space Race” through the Prism of Global Scientific and Technological Leadership’. Philosophy and Cosmology 25 (5) (2020), 57-68. DOI 10.29202/phil-cosm/25/5.
Su, Ping and Maximilian Mayer. ‘Science Diplomacy and Trust Building: “Science China” in the Arctic’. Global Policy 9 (2018), 23-28. DOI 10.1111/1758-5899.12576.
Svyrydenko, Denys and Oleksandr Stovpets. ‘Cultural and Economic Strategies of Modern China: In Search of the Co-operation Models across the Global World’. Future Human Image 13 (2020), 102-112.
Taylor, Ian and Zhangxi Cheng. ‘China as a “Rising Power”: Why the Status Quo Matters’. Third World Quarterly 43 (1) (2020), 244-258. DOI 10.1080/01436597.2021.2005462.
Tellis, Ashley J. ‘China’s Military Space Strategy’. Survival 49 (3) (2007), 41-72. DOI 10.1080/00396330701564752.
UNOOSA. ‘Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, Including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies’. 19 December 1966. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/outerspacetreaty.html.
UNOOSA. ‘Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies’. 5 December 1979. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/moon-agreement.html.
UNOOSA, ‘United Nations and China Agree to Increased Space Co-operation’. 16 June 2016. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/informationfor/media/2016-unis-os-468.html.
UNOOSA, ‘United Nations/China Co-operation on the Utilization of the China Space Station: First Announcement of Opportunity’. 28 May 2018a. https://www.unoosa.org/documents/doc/psa/hsti/CSS_1stAO/CSS_1stAO_Announcement_2018.pdf.
UNOOSA. ‘UN And China Invite Applications to Conduct Experiments on-board China’s Space Station’. 28 May 2018b. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/informationfor/media/2018-unis-os-496.html.
UNOOSA. ‘The United Nations/China Co-operation on the Utilization of the China Space Station (CSS)’. n.d. https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/access2space4all/China-Space-Station/CSS_Index.html.
UNOOSA and CMS. ‘United Nations/China Co-operation on the Utilization of the China Space Station’. 20 September 2018. https://www.unoosa.org/documents/doc/psa/hsti/CSS_1stAO/Leaflet_18-05889_Co-operation_ebook_updated14092018.pdf.
US Department of State. ‘Agreement among the Government of Canada, Governments of the Member States of the European Space Agency, the Government of Japan, the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the United States of America Concerning Co-operation on the Civil International Space Station’. 1998. https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/12927-Multilateral-Space-Space-Station-1.29.1998.pdf.
Vlasic, Ivan A. ‘The Space Treaty: A Preliminary Evaluation’. California Law Review 55 (2) (1967), 507-519. DOI 10.2307/3479358.
Wang, Guoyu. ‘NASA’s Artemis Accords: The Path to a United Space Law or a Divided One?’. The Space Review, 24 August 2020. https://www.thespacereview.com/article/4009/1.
Weber, Katja. Hierarchy amidst Anarchy: Transaction Costs and Institutional Choice (Albany: SUNY Press, 2000).
Xinhua. ‘China, Russia Ink Accord on Building Scientific Research Station on Moon’. 9 March 2021a. http://english.www.gov.cn/news/internationalexchanges/202103/09/content_WS60477c8ac6d0719374afa78d.html.
Xinhua. ‘China Welcomes Foreign Astronauts to Space Station Flights’. 15 October 2021b. http://www.news.cn/english/2021-10/15/c_1310245449.htm.
Zhang, Lulu, Jian Yang, Jingjing Zang, Yuhong Wang and Liguang Sun. ‘Reforming China’s Polar Science and Technology System’. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 44(3-4) (2019), 387-401. DOI 10.1080/03080188.2019.1627639.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1101 | 812 | 95 |
Full Text Views | 471 | 60 | 8 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 873 | 140 | 21 |
This article compares two central pillars of China’s space programme and observes that Chinese space diplomacy is not uniform regarding international scientific co-operation either in its approaches or in results. In the case of the Chinese Space Station programme, the China National Space Administration went through existing United Nations (UN) channels and successfully attracted international partners. However, the International Lunar Research Station has avoided UN channels and used national and bilateral platforms. This bifurcation in approaches and results offers an intriguing puzzle concerning international co-operation: practices of institutionalised multilateral co-operation and areas of state-centric bilateral co-operation co-exist in this case and further complicate the issue of space diplomacy. To propose a potential explanation, it is argued here that a crucial intermediate variable — institutional density — requires further theorising, as it seems to influence strategic choices about space diplomacy, which may lead to success or failure.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1101 | 812 | 95 |
Full Text Views | 471 | 60 | 8 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 873 | 140 | 21 |