Save

To What Ends EU Foreign Policy? Contending Approaches to the Union’s Diplomatic Objectives and Representation

In: The Hague Journal of Diplomacy
Authors:
Daniel C. Thomas adaniel.thomas@ucd.ie bben.tonra@ucd.ie

Search for other papers by Daniel C. Thomas in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Ben Tonra adaniel.thomas@ucd.ie bben.tonra@ucd.ie

Search for other papers by Ben Tonra in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Summary

The strengthened Office of the High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and the new European External Action Service (EEAS) presuppose a set of interests and/or values that the European Union (EU) wishes to pursue on the world stage. But what are those interests and/or values and how does the EU reach agreement on them? Rather than simply ‘cutting and pasting’ from EU treaties and strategy papers, this article identifies seven distinct theoretical models of how the EU and its member states arrive collectively at a definition of their diplomatic objectives. The seven models include intergovernmentalist models of veto threats and log-rolling, normative institutionalist models of cooperative bargaining and entrapment, and constructivist and sociological institutionalist models of elite socialization, Europeanization and collective identity formation. The article identifies the logics of each model and notes their implications for the role of the EU’s new foreign policy institutions.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 792 146 14
Full Text Views 322 20 0
PDF Views & Downloads 305 38 0