Diplomatic Training and the Challenges Facing the EEAS
In: The Hague Journal of DiplomacySearch for other papers by Simon Duke in
Current site
Google Scholar
Summary
Following a difficult birth, the European External Action Service (EEAS) is now a much scrutinized reality. Much of the analysis has concentrated on its quasi-institutional nature, its relations with the principal external action actors in the European Union and beyond, as well as the question of its legal capacity. Relatively little attention, however, has been paid to the important training dimensions, which are critical to the smooth development of the Service, especially considering the disparate backgrounds of EEAS constituents. This article argues that there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution to the training dilemma. Differentiation rather than standardization, within the constraints of a programme (rather than a full-blown European Diplomatic Academy), will be the salient features of the first years of training in the EEAS. It is also argued that training can be a key strategic tool for the Service’s development and, more generally, the external relations of the EU itself.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
3)
Stephanie Kinney, ‘Developing Diplomats for 2010: If Not Now, When?’, American Diplomacy, vol. 5, no. 3, summer 2000, part I, p. 2.
-
6)
SEC (1996) 554/2, 27 March 1996.
-
8)
Jörg Monar, ‘The Case for a Diplomatic Academy of the European Union’, European Foreign Affairs Review, vol. 5, no. 3, July 2000, p. 283.
-
13)
Rayner, The EU Foreign Ministry and Union Embassies, pp. 30-31.
-
14)
European Parliament, ‘A Common Community Diplomacy’, European Parliament Resolution on a Common Community Diplomacy, A5-0210/2000, 24 July 2010, para. 24.
-
17)
Quoted in Simon Duke, ‘Preparing for Euro-diplomacy?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 40, no. 5, December 2002, pp. 861-862.
-
28)
Bruno Waterfield, ‘EU Trains a New Diplomatic Corps: Without Waiting for Lisbon Treaty’, Daily Telegraph, 12 April 2009.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1660 | 202 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 341 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 348 | 25 | 0 |
Diplomatic Training and the Challenges Facing the EEAS
In: The Hague Journal of DiplomacySearch for other papers by Simon Duke in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Following a difficult birth, the European External Action Service (EEAS) is now a much scrutinized reality. Much of the analysis has concentrated on its quasi-institutional nature, its relations with the principal external action actors in the European Union and beyond, as well as the question of its legal capacity. Relatively little attention, however, has been paid to the important training dimensions, which are critical to the smooth development of the Service, especially considering the disparate backgrounds of EEAS constituents. This article argues that there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution to the training dilemma. Differentiation rather than standardization, within the constraints of a programme (rather than a full-blown European Diplomatic Academy), will be the salient features of the first years of training in the EEAS. It is also argued that training can be a key strategic tool for the Service’s development and, more generally, the external relations of the EU itself.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1660 | 202 | 10 |
| Full Text Views | 341 | 13 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 348 | 25 | 0 |
