Save

Opening the Windows on Diplomacy: A Comparison of the Domestic Dimension of Public Diplomacy in Canada and Australia

In: The Hague Journal of Diplomacy
Authors:
Ellen Huijgh a)University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, The Hague, The Netherlands ehuijgh@clingendael.nl b)Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia caibyrne@bond.edu.au

Search for other papers by Ellen Huijgh in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Caitlin Byrne a)University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, The Hague, The Netherlands ehuijgh@clingendael.nl b)Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia caibyrne@bond.edu.au

Search for other papers by Caitlin Byrne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Summary

Public diplomacy’s scholarship and practice are evolving and seeking to adapt to the expanding interests, expectations, connectivity and mobility of the publics that have come to define the field in an organic fashion. The characteristic distinction between international and domestic publics as the key to defining the practice of public diplomacy is increasingly challenged by public audiences that are no longer constrained by such traditional delineations. The attention on the involvement of domestic publics in public diplomacy, or its domestic dimension, has to be understood within this context. This article aims to cast further light on public diplomacy’s domestic dimension, with Canada and Australia — two countries that have much in common — as the launch pads for discussion. The article’s first section investigates the approach and development of public diplomacy’s domestic dimension in both countries and draws out the similarities and differences. The second section identifies the opportunities, challenges and tendencies in its practice as well as the conceptual implications. The article finds that while differences in approach remain, Canada and Australia have more in common than not when it comes to involving domestic audiences in international policy, especially in recent years. Their practice of public diplomacy’s domestic dimension appears to be resilient and adaptive in nature, although it has been subject to fluctuations resulting from changes in the political climate, leadership styles and governmental preferences, and resource availability. Additionally, reconceptualizing public diplomacy with a domestic dimension and constructivist underpinnings opens the window on norms that are taken for granted in diplomacy and offers the potential for a more inclusive view and practice — a better fit for its time.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 884 223 14
Full Text Views 223 17 1
PDF Views & Downloads 216 37 2