Understanding Enmity and Friendship in World Politics: The Case for a Diplomatic Approach

in The Hague Journal of Diplomacy
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Summary

This article invites diplomatic scholars to a debate about the identity of diplomacy as a field of study and the contributions that it can make to our understanding of world politics relative to international relations theory (IR) or foreign policy analysis (FPA). To this end, the article argues that the study of diplomacy as a method of building and managing relationships of enmity and friendship in world politics can most successfully firm up the identity of the discipline. More specifically, diplomacy offers a specialized form of knowledge for understanding how to draw distinctions between potential allies versus rivals, and how to make and unmake relationships of enmity and friendship in world politics.

Sections
References
  • 2)

    Henry KissingerDiplomacy (New York: Simon & Schuster1994); and Zbigniew Brzezinski The Choice: Global Domination or Global Leadership (New York: Basic Books 2004).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 7)

    Cited in Paul SharpDiplomatic Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2009) p. 6.

  • 8)

    Edward Hallett CarrThe Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (London: Macmillan1940).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 10)

    Kenneth N. WaltzTheory of International Politics (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley1979).

  • 12)

    Alexander WendtSocial Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1999) pp. 11-12.

  • 13)

    Morton A. KaplanSystem and Process in International Policies (New York: Wiley1957); and Richard N. Rosecrance Action and Reaction in World Politics (Boston MA: Little Brown 1963).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 14)

    Hedley Bull‘International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach’World Politicsvol. 18 no. 3 1966.

  • 15)

    Graham T. AllisonEssence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (Boston, MA: Little, Brown1971); K.J. Holsti ‘National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy’ International Studies Quarterly. vol. 14 1970; Irving L. Janis Victims of Groupthink: A Psychological Study of Foreign-Policy Decisions and Fiascoes (Boston MA: Houghton 1972); and James N. Rosenau The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy (New York: Free Press 1971).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18)

    Alexander Wendt‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’International Organizationvol. 46 no. 2 1992.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 19)

    V.M. Hudson‘Foreign Policy Analysis: Actor-Specific Theory and the Ground of International Relations’Foreign Policy Analysisvol. 1 no. 1 2005; Donald A. Sylvan and James F. Voss Problem Representation in Foreign Policy Decision-making (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1998).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 20)

    R.D. Putnam‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of 2-Level Games’International Organizationvol. 42 no. 3 1988; Rose McDermott Political Psychology in International Relations (Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press 2004); and Richard Carlton Snyder et al. Foreign Policy Decision-Making Revisited (New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21)

    David A. WelchPainful Choices: A Theory of Foreign Policy Change (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press2005).

  • 22)

    Walter Carlsnaes‘Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis’International Studies Quarterlyvol. 36 no. 3 1992; and Steve Smith ‘Theories of Foreign Policy: A Historical Overview’ Review of International Studies vol. 12 1986.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 23)

    Ted HopfSocial Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies Moscow 1955 and 1999 (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press2002); Janice Bially Mattern Ordering International Politics: Identity Crisis and Representational Force (New York: Routledge 2004); and David Campbell Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity (Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press 1998).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24)

    Jennifer Mitzen‘Reading Habermas in Anarchy: Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Public Spheres’American Political Science Reviewvol. 99 no. 3 2005; and Corneliu Bjola Legitimizing the Use of Force in International Politics: Kosovo Iraq and the Ethics Of Intervention Contemporary Security Studies (London and New York: Routledge 2009).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25)

    Nicole Deitelhoff‘The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case’International Organizationvol. 63 no. 1 2009; and J. Wilkenfeld et al. ‘Mediating International Crises: Cross-national and Experimental Perspectives’ Journal of Conflict Resolution vol. 47 no. 3 2003.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 26)

    G.F. Kennan‘Diplomacy Without Diplomats?’Foreign Affairsvol. 76 no. 5 1997.

  • 27)

    I.B. Neumann‘To Be a Diplomat’International Studies Perspectivesvol. 6 2005; and Geoff Berridge Diplomacy: Theory and Practice (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan 4th edition 2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 28)

    Geoffrey Wiseman‘Bringing Diplomacy Back In: Time for Theory to Catch Up with Practice’International Studies Reviewvol. 13 no. 4 2011 p. 711.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29)

    Stuart Murray‘Diplomatic Theory and the Evolving Canon of Diplomatic Studies’International Studies Review vol. 13 no. 4 2011 pp. 720-721.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30)

    Hedley Bull and Adam WatsonThe Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press1984).

  • 31)

    Andrew HurrellOn Global Order: Power Values and the Constitution Of International Society (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press2007).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34)

    G. John IkenberryAfter Victory: Institutions Strategic Restraint and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press2001).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 35)

    SharpDiplomatic Theory of International Relations p. 10; and James Der Derian On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement (Oxford: Blackwell 1987).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36)

    Harold NicolsonThe Evolution of Diplomatic Method (London: Cassell1988) p. 3.

  • 37)

    WatsonDiplomacy p. 15.

  • 38)

    Iver B. Neumann‘Self and Other in International Relations’European Journal of International Relationsvol. 2 no. 2 1996; and William E. Connolly Identity Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox (Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press expanded edition 2002).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 41)

    Armand Jean du Plessis RichelieuPolitical Testament: The Significant Chapters and Supporting Selections (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press1961) p. 95.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 42)

    KissingerDiplomacy p. 60.

  • 44)

    William R. ThompsonGreat Power Rivalries (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press1999).

  • 46)

    BullThe Anarchical Society p. 86.

  • 47)

    Charles ChatterjeeInternational Law and Diplomacy (London and New York: Routledge2007) p. 250.

  • 48)

    Susan StrangeCasino Capitalism (Oxford and New York: Blackwell1986).

  • 50)

    Robert Gilpin and Jean M. GilpinThe Challenge of Global Capitalism: The World Economy in the 21st Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press2000); and Fabrice Lehmann and Jean-Pierre Lehmann Peace and Prosperity through World Trade (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 51)

    Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. NyePower and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (Boston, MA: Little, Brown1977).

  • 53)

    C. Bjola and M. Kornprobst‘Security Communities and the Habitus of Restraint: Germany and the United States on Iraq’Review of International Studiesvol. 33 no. 2 2007.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 54)

    CampbellWriting Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity p. 139.

  • 55)

    Philip Nel‘Redistribution and Recognition: What Emerging Regional Powers Want’Review of International Studiesvol. 36 2010; Axel Honneth The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts (Cambridge: Polity Press 1995); and Allen Buchanan ‘Recognitional Legitimacy and the State System’ Philosophy and Public Affairs vol. 28 no. 1 1999.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 56)

    Thomas LindemannCauses of War: The Struggle for Recognition (Colchester: ECPR Press2010); Reinhard Wolf ‘Respect and Disrespect in International Politics: The Significance of Status Recognition’ International Theory 3 no. 1 2011; and Richard Ned Lebow A Cultural Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 57)

    P.H. Gries‘Social Psychology and the Identity-Conflict Debate: Is a China “Threat” Inevitable?’European Journal of International Relationsvol. 11 no. 2 2005 p. 248.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 61)

    Alexander Wendt‘Collective Identity Formation and the International State’American Political Science Reviewvol. 88 no. 2 1994.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 62)

    Aaron M. Hoffman‘A Conceptualization of Trust in International Relations’European Journal of International Relationsvol. 8 no. 3 2002.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 63)

    John R. SearleThe Construction of Social Reality (New York: Free Press1995) p. 23.

  • 64)

    SearleThe Construction of Social Reality p. 25.

  • 65)

    Srdjan VuceticThe Anglosphere: A Genealogy of a Racialized Identity in International Relations (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press2011).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66)

    Mitzen‘Reading Habermas in Anarchy’ pp. 12-14.

  • 68)

    Mitzen‘Governing Together’ p. 59.

  • 69)

    R.B. Mitchell‘Sources of Transparency: Information Systems in International Regimes’International Studies Quarterlyvol. 42 no. 1 1998.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 70)

    Mitzen‘Governing Together’ pp. 59-60.

  • 71)

    Martyn HousdenThe League of Nations and the Organisation of Peace (New York: Pearson Longman2011).

  • 74)

    A.I. Johnston‘Is China a Status Quo Power?’International Securityvol. 27 no. 4 2003.

  • 77)

    Aparna PandeExplaining Pakistan’s Foreign Policy: Escaping India (London and New York: Routledge2011).

  • 80)

    SharpDiplomatic Theory of International Relations p. 58.

  • 81)

    Jan MelissenThe New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations (Houndmills and New York: Palgrave Macmillan2005); and Joseph S. Nye ‘Public Diplomacy and Soft Power’ Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science no. 616 2008.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 82)

    ChatterjeeInternational Law and Diplomacy p. 73.

  • 84)

    B.I. Spector‘Negotiating with Villains Revisited: Research Note’International Negotiationvol. 8 no. 1 2003.

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 149 140 6
Full Text Views 235 235 1
PDF Downloads 30 30 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0