Diplomacy and Symbolism

In: The Hague Journal of Diplomacy

Summary

Diplomacy makes extensive use of symbols, rituals and ceremonies. This practice is related to the nature of the state and diplomatic representation: (a) states and their intentions can be objectified through symbols, symbolic actions and interactions; and (b) diplomatic agencies and agents symbolically represent the state. Symbolism in diplomacy helps people to capture the meaning of international affairs and socially and individually to experience states and inter-state relations. Symbols, rituals and ceremonies in diplomacy are designed to create a shared sense and also to motivate and regulate the moods of groups and individuals who directly or indirectly participate in or observe diplomatic practice. Linguistics, imagery and ritualistic/ceremonial formats of symbolism exist in diplomatic practice. Each can have communicative, regulative and affective functions. Symbolism is meaningful and instrumental in making sense of states and international politics and in managing and regulating inter-state relations. However, diplomatic symbolism can also be used formally and manipulatively.

  • 4)

    Juyan Zhang‘Public Diplomacy as Symbolic Interactions: A Case Study of Asian Tsunami Relief Campaigns’Public Relations Reviewvol. 32, no. 1, March 2006, pp. 26–32.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5)

    David I. KertzerRitual, Politics, and Power (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press1988), p. 104.

  • 7)

    Alexander WendtSocial Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1999), p. 5.

  • 8)

    Michael Walzer‘On the Role of Symbolism in Political Thought’Political Science Quarterlyvol. 82, no. 2, June 1967, p. 194.

  • 9)

    Adam WatsonDiplomacy: The Dialogue Between States (London: Eyre Methuen1982), p. 14.

  • 10)

    Henry KissingerDiplomacy (New York: Simon & Schuster1994), p. 101.

  • 11)

    KissingerDiplomacy, p. 503.

  • 13)

    Tobias TheilerPolitical Symbolism and European Integration (Manchester: Manchester University Press2005), pp. 12–13.

  • 14)

    TheilerPolitical Symbolism and European Integration, p. 12.

  • 15)

    JönssonDiplomatic Signaling in the Amarna Letters, p. 202.

  • 17)

    Girma NegashApologia Politica: States and Their Apologies by Proxy (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books2006), p. 110.

  • 18)

    KertzerRitual, Politics, and Power, p. 11.

  • 19)

    Lisa SchirchRitual and Symbol in Peacebuilding (Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press2005), p. 82.

  • 20)

    Christer Jönsson and Martin HallEssence of Diplomacy (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan2005), p. 45.

  • 21)

    Manuel Roig-Franzia‘Havana’s 148 Flags Prove Mightier than the Billboard’Washington PostMay 13, 2006, available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/12/AR2006051201879.html.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 24)

    TheilerPolitical Symbolism and European Integration, p. 33; and Jönsson, Diplomatic Signaling in the Amarna Letters, p. 201

  • 25)

    KertzerRitual, Politics, and Power, p. 4.

  • 27)

    Barry O’NeillHonor, Symbols, and War (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press2002), p. xi.

  • 28)

    Zdzislaw MachSymbols, Conflict, and Identity: Essays in Political Anthropology (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press1993), p. 35.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 29)

    US Department of State‘Using Social Media’Foreign Affairs Manual, Volume 5: Information Management (Washington, DC: US Department of State, 10 June 2010), available online at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/144186.pdf.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 30)

    MorgenthauPolitics Among Nations, p. 88.

  • 33)

    CohenNegotiating Across Cultures, p. 17.

  • 34)

    O’NeillHonor, Symbols, and War, pp. xi-xii.

  • 35)

    Harold NicolsonDiplomacy (Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Institute for the Study of Diplomacy Edition1988), p. 122.

  • 36)

    Raymond CohenInternational Politics: The Rules of the Game (London: Longman1981).

  • 39)

    Michael P. MarksMetaphors in International Relations Theory (New York: Palgrave Macmillan2011), p. 183.

  • 40)

    Jeffery Scott Mio‘Metaphor and Politics’Metaphor and Symbolvol. 12, no 2, 1997, pp. 121.

  • 41)

    Mio‘Metaphor and Politics’, p. 128.

  • 42)

    Mio‘Metaphor and Politics’, p. 130.

  • 43)

    Jönsson and HallEssence of Diplomacy, p. 45.

  • 44)

    Jönsson and HallEssence of Diplomacy, p. 65.

  • 45)

    Garrett MattinglyRenaissance Diplomacy (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin1955), p. 39.

  • 47)

    KertzerRitual, Politics, and Power, p. 11.

  • 48)

    Karen A. CeruloIdentity Designs: The Sights and Sounds of a Nation (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press1995), pp. 32–33.

  • 51)

    KertzerRitual, Politics, and Power, pp. 12 and 31.

  • 52)

    Raymond CohenTheatre of Power: The Art of Diplomatic Signalling (London/New York: Longman1987); Jönsson and Hall, Essence of Diplomacy; Christer Jönsson and Karin Aggestam, ‘Trends in Diplomatic Signalling’, in Jan Melissen (ed.), Innovation in Diplomatic Practice (Houndmills: Palgrave, 1999), pp. 151–170; and Kishan S. Rana, ‘Diplomatic Signalling’, in Bilateral Diplomacy (Geneva/Malta: DiploFoundation, 2007), pp. 213–225.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53)

    CohenTheatre of Power, p. 22.

  • 54)

    Christer JönssonCommunication in International Bargaining (London: Pinter1990), p. 44.

  • 56)

    CeruloIdentity Designs, p. 3.

  • 57)

    KertzerRitual, Politics, and Power, p. 6.

  • 58)

    SchirchRitual and Symbol in Peacebuilding, p. 2.

  • 60)

    KertzerRitual, Politics, and Power, p. 178.

  • 61)

    KertzerRitual, Politics, and Power, p. 37.

  • 62)

    JönssonDiplomatic Signaling in the Amarna Letters, p. 193.

  • 65)

    Alexander Wendt‘The State as Person in International Theory’Review of International Studiesvol. 30, no. 2, 2004, pp. 289–316; and Alisher Faizullaev, ‘Individual Experiencing of States’, Review of International Studies, vol. 33, no. 3, 2007, pp. 531–554.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66)

    SchirchRitual and Symbol in Peacebuilding, p. 138.

  • 68)

    Orrin Edgar KlappCollective Search for Identity (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston1969); Raymond Firth, Symbols: Public and Private (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1975); Bernhard Leistle, ‘Ritual as Sensory Communication: A Theoretical and Analytical Perspective’, in Klaus-Peter Köpping, Bernhard Leistle and Michael Rudolph (eds), Ritual and Identity: Performative Practices as Effective Transformation of Social Reality (Berlin: LIT Verlag Berlin, 2006); Schirch, Ritual and Symbol in Peacebuilding; Kertzer, Ritual, Politics, and Power; Ioan M. Lewis, ‘Introduction’, in Ioan M. Lewis (ed.), Symbols and Sentiments (London: Academic, 1977), pp. 1–24; and James Fernandez, ‘Persuasions and Performances: Of the Beast in Every Body . . . And the Metaphors of Everyman’, in Clifford Geertz (ed.), Myth, Symbol and Culture (New York: Norton, 1971), pp. 39–60.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 69)

    KertzerRitual, Politics, and Power, p. 92.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 845 390 20
Full Text Views 482 189 4
PDF Downloads 183 138 3