Diplomacy and Symbolism

in The Hague Journal of Diplomacy
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Summary

Diplomacy makes extensive use of symbols, rituals and ceremonies. This practice is related to the nature of the state and diplomatic representation: (a) states and their intentions can be objectified through symbols, symbolic actions and interactions; and (b) diplomatic agencies and agents symbolically represent the state. Symbolism in diplomacy helps people to capture the meaning of international affairs and socially and individually to experience states and inter-state relations. Symbols, rituals and ceremonies in diplomacy are designed to create a shared sense and also to motivate and regulate the moods of groups and individuals who directly or indirectly participate in or observe diplomatic practice. Linguistics, imagery and ritualistic/ceremonial formats of symbolism exist in diplomatic practice. Each can have communicative, regulative and affective functions. Symbolism is meaningful and instrumental in making sense of states and international politics and in managing and regulating inter-state relations. However, diplomatic symbolism can also be used formally and manipulatively.

Diplomacy and Symbolism

in The Hague Journal of Diplomacy

Sections

References

4)

Juyan Zhang‘Public Diplomacy as Symbolic Interactions: A Case Study of Asian Tsunami Relief Campaigns’Public Relations Reviewvol. 32 no. 1 March 2006 pp. 26–32.

5)

David I. KertzerRitual Politics and Power (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press1988) p. 104.

7)

Alexander WendtSocial Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1999) p. 5.

8)

Michael Walzer‘On the Role of Symbolism in Political Thought’Political Science Quarterlyvol. 82 no. 2 June 1967 p. 194.

9)

Adam WatsonDiplomacy: The Dialogue Between States (London: Eyre Methuen1982) p. 14.

10)

Henry KissingerDiplomacy (New York: Simon & Schuster1994) p. 101.

11)

KissingerDiplomacy p. 503.

13)

Tobias TheilerPolitical Symbolism and European Integration (Manchester: Manchester University Press2005) pp. 12–13.

14)

TheilerPolitical Symbolism and European Integration p. 12.

15)

JönssonDiplomatic Signaling in the Amarna Letters p. 202.

17)

Girma NegashApologia Politica: States and Their Apologies by Proxy (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books2006) p. 110.

18)

KertzerRitual Politics and Power p. 11.

19)

Lisa SchirchRitual and Symbol in Peacebuilding (Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press2005) p. 82.

20)

Christer Jönsson and Martin HallEssence of Diplomacy (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan2005) p. 45.

21)

Manuel Roig-Franzia‘Havana’s 148 Flags Prove Mightier than the Billboard’Washington PostMay 13 2006 available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/12/AR2006051201879.html.

24)

TheilerPolitical Symbolism and European Integration p. 33; and Jönsson Diplomatic Signaling in the Amarna Letters p. 201

25)

KertzerRitual Politics and Power p. 4.

27)

Barry O’NeillHonor Symbols and War (Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press2002) p. xi.

28)

Zdzislaw MachSymbols Conflict and Identity: Essays in Political Anthropology (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press1993) p. 35.

29)

US Department of State‘Using Social Media’Foreign Affairs Manual Volume 5: Information Management (Washington DC: US Department of State 10 June 2010) available online at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/144186.pdf.

30)

MorgenthauPolitics Among Nations p. 88.

33)

CohenNegotiating Across Cultures p. 17.

34)

O’NeillHonor Symbols and War pp. xi-xii.

35)

Harold NicolsonDiplomacy (Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Institute for the Study of Diplomacy Edition1988) p. 122.

36)

Raymond CohenInternational Politics: The Rules of the Game (London: Longman1981).

39)

Michael P. MarksMetaphors in International Relations Theory (New York: Palgrave Macmillan2011) p. 183.

40)

Jeffery Scott Mio‘Metaphor and Politics’Metaphor and Symbolvol. 12 no 2 1997 pp. 121.

41)

Mio‘Metaphor and Politics’ p. 128.

42)

Mio‘Metaphor and Politics’ p. 130.

43)

Jönsson and HallEssence of Diplomacy p. 45.

44)

Jönsson and HallEssence of Diplomacy p. 65.

45)

Garrett MattinglyRenaissance Diplomacy (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin1955) p. 39.

47)

KertzerRitual Politics and Power p. 11.

48)

Karen A. CeruloIdentity Designs: The Sights and Sounds of a Nation (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press1995) pp. 32–33.

51)

KertzerRitual Politics and Power pp. 12 and 31.

52)

Raymond CohenTheatre of Power: The Art of Diplomatic Signalling (London/New York: Longman1987); Jönsson and Hall Essence of Diplomacy; Christer Jönsson and Karin Aggestam ‘Trends in Diplomatic Signalling’ in Jan Melissen (ed.) Innovation in Diplomatic Practice (Houndmills: Palgrave 1999) pp. 151–170; and Kishan S. Rana ‘Diplomatic Signalling’ in Bilateral Diplomacy (Geneva/Malta: DiploFoundation 2007) pp. 213–225.

53)

CohenTheatre of Power p. 22.

54)

Christer JönssonCommunication in International Bargaining (London: Pinter1990) p. 44.

56)

CeruloIdentity Designs p. 3.

57)

KertzerRitual Politics and Power p. 6.

58)

SchirchRitual and Symbol in Peacebuilding p. 2.

60)

KertzerRitual Politics and Power p. 178.

61)

KertzerRitual Politics and Power p. 37.

62)

JönssonDiplomatic Signaling in the Amarna Letters p. 193.

65)

Alexander Wendt‘The State as Person in International Theory’Review of International Studiesvol. 30 no. 2 2004 pp. 289–316; and Alisher Faizullaev ‘Individual Experiencing of States’ Review of International Studies vol. 33 no. 3 2007 pp. 531–554.

66)

SchirchRitual and Symbol in Peacebuilding p. 138.

68)

Orrin Edgar KlappCollective Search for Identity (New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston1969); Raymond Firth Symbols: Public and Private (London: George Allen & Unwin 1975); Bernhard Leistle ‘Ritual as Sensory Communication: A Theoretical and Analytical Perspective’ in Klaus-Peter Köpping Bernhard Leistle and Michael Rudolph (eds) Ritual and Identity: Performative Practices as Effective Transformation of Social Reality (Berlin: LIT Verlag Berlin 2006); Schirch Ritual and Symbol in Peacebuilding; Kertzer Ritual Politics and Power; Ioan M. Lewis ‘Introduction’ in Ioan M. Lewis (ed.) Symbols and Sentiments (London: Academic 1977) pp. 1–24; and James Fernandez ‘Persuasions and Performances: Of the Beast in Every Body . . . And the Metaphors of Everyman’ in Clifford Geertz (ed.) Myth Symbol and Culture (New York: Norton 1971) pp. 39–60.

69)

KertzerRitual Politics and Power p. 92.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 189 189 89
Full Text Views 50 50 30
PDF Downloads 17 17 11
EPUB Downloads 8 8 1