Save

Formal Argument and Olympiodorus’ Development as a Plato-Commentator

In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
Author:
Harold Tarrant School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Newcastle Newcastle NSW Australia

Search for other papers by Harold Tarrant in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7923-9986
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Olympiodorus led the Platonist school of philosophy at Alexandria for several decades in the sixth century, and both Platonic and Aristotelian commentaries ascribed to him survive. During this time the school’s attitude to the teaching of Aristotelian syllogistic, originally owing something to Ammonius, changed markedly, with an early tendency to reinforce the teaching of syllogistic even in Platonist lectures giving way to a greater awareness of its limitations. The vocabulary for arguments and their construction becomes far commoner than the language of syllogistic and syllogistic figures, and also of demonstration. I discuss the value of these changes for the dating of certain works, especially where the text lectured on does not demand different emphases. The commitment to argument rather than to authority continues, but a greater emphasis eventually falls on the establishment of the premises than on formal validity.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 223 0 0
Full Text Views 197 73 3
PDF Views & Downloads 206 31 0