Save

The Pittsburgh Kantians: Brandom, Conant, Haugeland, and McDowell on Kant

In: History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis
Author:
Jacob Browning Computer Science Department, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University New York USA

Search for other papers by Jacob Browning in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3102-5932
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Over the last thirty years, a group of philosophers associated with the University of Pittsburgh—Robert Brandom, James Conant, John Haugeland, and John McDowell—have developed a novel reading of Kant. Their interest turns on Kant’s problem of objective purport: how can my thoughts be about the world? This paper summarizes the shared reading of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction by these four philosophers and how it solves the problem of objective purport. But I also show these philosophers radically diverge in how they view Kant’s relevance for contemporary philosophy. I highlight an important distinction between those that hold a quietist response to Kant, evident in Conant and McDowell, and those that hold a constructive response, evident in Brandom and Haugeland. The upshot is that the Pittsburgh Kantians have a distinctive approach to Kant, but also radically different responses to his problem of objective purport.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1021 187 7
Full Text Views 54 18 4
PDF Views & Downloads 138 45 9