I defend the view that Cicero writes the Academica from the perspective of an aspirationalist radical skeptic. In section 2 I examine the textual evidence regarding the nature of Cicero’s skeptical stance in the Academica. In section 3 I consider the textual evidence from the Academica for attributing aspirationalism to Cicero. Finally, in section 4 I argue that while aspirationalist radical skepticism is open to a number of philosophical objections, none of those objections is decisive.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Cicero, M.T. Academica. Rackham, H. (tr.), 1951. Cicero. Vol. 19. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (= Acad.)
Cicero, M.T. De natura deorum. Rackham, H. (tr.), 1951. Cicero. Vol. 19. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Cicero, M.T. Letters to Friends, Vol. II. Shackleton Bailey, D.R. (ed., tr.).2001 Cicero, Vol. 26. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (= Fam.)
Cicero, M.T. On Academic Scepticism. Brittain, C. (tr.), 2006. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Plato. The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Hamilton, E. & Cairns, H. (eds.), 1989. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Seneca. On Anger. In: Cooper, J.M. & Procopé, J.F. (eds.), 1995. Moral and Political Essays, 1–116. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seneca. Letters on Ethics to Lucilius. Graver, M. & Long, A.A. (trs.), 2015. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of Scepticism. Annas, J. & Barnes, J. (eds., trs.), 2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (= PH)
Aikin, S. 2014. Evidentialism and the Will to Believe. London: Bloomsbury.
Aikin, S. 2017. Seneca on Surpassing God. Journal of the American Philosophical Association 3(1), 22–31.
Brittain, Ch. 2001. Philo of Larissa. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brittain, Ch. 2016. Cicero’s Sceptical Methods: The Example of the De Finibus. In: Annas, J. & Betegh, G. (eds.), Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 12–40.
Brouwer, R. 2002. Sagehood and the Stoics. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 23, 181–224.
Burridge, R. 2007. Imitating Jesus: An Inclusive Approach to New Testament Ethics. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing.
Cappello, O. 2019. The School of Doubt: Skepticism, History and Politics in Cicero’s Academica. Leiden: Brill.
Clifford, W.K. 1999. The Ethics of Belief. In: Madigan, T. (ed.), The Ethics of Belief and Other Essays. Amherst, MA: Prometheus, 70–96.
Conee, E. & Feldman, R. 2004. Evidentialism: Essays in Epistemology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Descartes, R. Meditations on First Philosophy. 2nd ed. Cottingham, J. (ed., tr.). 2017. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Diogenes Laertius. Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Volume 2: Books 6–10. Hicks (tr.). 1925. Loeb Classical Library 185. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (= DL)
Dutton, B. 2016. Augustine and Academic Skepticism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Epictetus. The Handbook. White, N. (tr.), 1983. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.
Feldman, R. & Conee, E. 1985. Evidentialism. Philosophical Studies 48(1), 15–34.
Frede, M. 1997. The Skeptic’s Two Kinds of Assent and the Question of the Possibility of Knowledge. In: Burnyeat, M. & Frede, M. (eds.), The Original Sceptics: A Controversy. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 127–151.
Görler, W. 1997. Cicero’s Philosophical Stance in the Lucullus. In: Inwood, B. & Manfeld, J. (eds.), Assent and Argument, 36–57. Leiden: Brill.
Hadot, P. 2002. What is Ancient Philosophy? Chase, M. (tr.). Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Lévy, C. 2010. The Sceptical Academy: Decline and Afterlife. In: Bett, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 81–104.
Penelhum, T. 1979. Hume’s Skepticism and the Dialogues. In: Norton, D.F., Capaldi, N. & Robison, W.L. (eds.), McGill Hume Studies. San Diego: Austin Hill Press, 253–278.
Penelhum, T. 1983. God and Skepticism. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Perin, C. 2005. Academic Arguments for the Indiscernibility Thesis. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86, 493–517.
Perin, C. 2010. The Demands of Reason: An Essay on Pyrrhonian Scepticism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reid, J.S. 1885. M. Tulli Ciceronis Academica. London: Macmillan and Co.
Ribeiro, B. 2002. Is Pyrrhonism Psychologically Possible? Ancient Philosophy 22(2), 319–331.
Ribeiro, B. 2021. Sextus, Montaigne, Hume: Pyrrhonizers. Leiden: Brill.
Ribeiro, B. forthcoming. Aspirationalism in Pyrrho’s Project of Living Suspensively. Sképsis: Revista de Filosofia.
Russell, D.C. 2004. Virtue as “Likeness to God” in Plato and Seneca. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42(3), 241–260.
Striker, G. 2010. “Academics versus Pyrrhonists, Reconsidered. In: Bett, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 195–207.
Thorsrud, H. 2009. Ancient Scepticism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Thorsrud, H. 2010. Arcesilaus and Carneades. In: Bett, R. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 58–80.
Thorsrud, H. 2018. Carneades. In: Machuca, D. & Reed, B. (eds.), Skepticism from Antiquity to the Present. London: Bloomsbury, 51–66.
Thomas à Kempis. The Imitation of Christ. Challoner (tr.), 2013. Charlotte, NC: TAN Books.
Williams, M. 1988. Scepticism Without Theory. Review of Metaphysics 41(3), 547–588.
Woolf, R. 2015. Cicero: The Philosophy of a Roman Sceptic. New York: Routledge.
Wynne, J.P.F. 2014. Learned and Wise: Cotta the Sceptic in Cicero’s On the Nature of the Gods. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47, 245–273.
Wynne, J.P.F. 2018. Cicero. In: Machuca, D. & Reed, B. (eds.), Skepticism from Antiquity to the Present. London: Bloomsbury, 93–101.
Wynne, J.P.F. 2019. Cicero on the Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wynne, J.P.F. 2000. Cicero’s Tusculan Disputations: A Sceptical Reading. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 58, 205–238.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 278 | 188 | 18 |
Full Text Views | 16 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 34 | 17 | 0 |
I defend the view that Cicero writes the Academica from the perspective of an aspirationalist radical skeptic. In section 2 I examine the textual evidence regarding the nature of Cicero’s skeptical stance in the Academica. In section 3 I consider the textual evidence from the Academica for attributing aspirationalism to Cicero. Finally, in section 4 I argue that while aspirationalist radical skepticism is open to a number of philosophical objections, none of those objections is decisive.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 278 | 188 | 18 |
Full Text Views | 16 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 34 | 17 | 0 |