Inspired by feminist legal theory and postcolonial literal studies this article interrogates the ‘transitional justice discourse’ and coins critiques which re-examine the discipline’s key tenets; namely, democracy, liberalism, rule of law and human rights. It argues that while transitional justice can be seen as one of the masculine human rights strategies that are reminiscent of imperial intervention in the lives of postcolonial subjects, it is open to seizure by the same. This is possible in transitional contexts since these situations create opportunities for stakeholders to rethink the inadequacies of the accepted discourse, and to subscribe to new ways of seeking justice.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Teitel (2000), supra n. 16. See also the discussion in Bell, Campbell and Ni Aolain, supra n. 75.
Teitel (1997), supra n. 54.
Teitel (1997), supra n. 54.
Teitel, (2000), supra n. 16; Teitel (1997), supra n. 54. See also Campbell and Ni Aolain, supra n. 75.
Teitel (1997), supra n. 54.
See Teitel (2000), supra n. 16 at 5, Bell, Campbell and Ni Aolain, supra n. 75 and Cobban, supra n. 59.
Teitel (2000), supra n. 16 at 7.
Security Council resolution 1325 (2000) on Women, Peace and Security (S/RES/1325 (2000). For a critique see C Bell and C O’Rourke, ‘Peace Agreements or Pieces of Paper? The Impact of UNSC Resolution 1325 on Peace Processes and Their Agreements’ (2010) 59(4) International and Comparative Law Quarterly 941.
S/RES/1325 (2000), ibid.
S/RES/1325 (2000), paras. 1, 10 and 11.
Nı´ Aola´in (2012), supra n. 17.
GP Landow, ‘Why I Use the Term ‘Postcolonial’ or Some Words from Your Webmaster’ The Postcolonial Web, available at: <http://www.postcolonialweb.org>.
A Mazrui, (1992), ‘Planned Governance and the Liberal Revival in Africa: The Paradox of Anticipation’ (1992) 25 Cornell International Law Journal 541.
Henry J Richardson III. (1996), ‘Failed States, Self-Determination, and Preventive Diplomacy: Colonialist Nostalgia and Democratic Expectation’, 10 Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 1.
Steiner et. al. ibid at 1314.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2852 | 657 | 88 |
Full Text Views | 670 | 36 | 5 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 928 | 82 | 14 |
Inspired by feminist legal theory and postcolonial literal studies this article interrogates the ‘transitional justice discourse’ and coins critiques which re-examine the discipline’s key tenets; namely, democracy, liberalism, rule of law and human rights. It argues that while transitional justice can be seen as one of the masculine human rights strategies that are reminiscent of imperial intervention in the lives of postcolonial subjects, it is open to seizure by the same. This is possible in transitional contexts since these situations create opportunities for stakeholders to rethink the inadequacies of the accepted discourse, and to subscribe to new ways of seeking justice.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2852 | 657 | 88 |
Full Text Views | 670 | 36 | 5 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 928 | 82 | 14 |