Save

When Politics Prevail Over the Rule of Law: The Demise of the sadc Tribunal

In: International Human Rights Law Review
View More View Less
  • 1 Professor of the Law of International Organizations, Department of Mediterranean Studies, University of the Aegean, Rhodes, , Greece, kmagliveras@aegean.gr
  • | 2 Former University Senior Lecturer in Law, Norwich, , United Kingdom, gnaldi@hotmail.com
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Abstract

The article questions whether the Tribunal of the Southern Africa Development Community (sadc) ought to have entertained human rights cases given that the sadc Treaty does not endow it with such jurisdiction. It then analyses its demise in 2010, which was prompted by several rulings against Zimbabwe, whose policy of expropriating land without compensation was held to violate human rights. The pertinent aspects of these cases are reviewed, and the significance of Zimbabwe’s land reform programme is explained. The article elucidates why sadc leaders were prepared to suspend the Tribunal’s operation. This was a combination of alarm that it could evolve into a quasi-regional human rights court but also solidarity with the then President Mugabe, a hero of Africa’s liberation struggle. Finally, the pronouncements of the Constitutional Court of South Africa and the High Court of Tanzania on the lawfulness of the sadc Tribunal’s suspension are considered.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 311 288 17
Full Text Views 13 13 2
PDF Views & Downloads 36 36 5