Inter-State Complaints under the African Human Rights System: a Breeze of Change?
In: International Human Rights Law ReviewSearch for other papers by Frans Viljoen in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
An inter-state procedure is provided for explicitly in the 1981 African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, on which the African regional human rights system is based, but the mechanism remains underused. Exploring the question why such a small number of inter-state cases have been submitted under the Africa system, the article points to the influence of a general culture of non-intervention and a preference for non-confrontational dispute mechanisms among African States; the existence of alternative channels to resolve cases involving massive or widespread violations cases; African States have over the years placed growing confidence in the icj; the delays associated with the drc decision; and a pervasive ignorance of inter-state complaints processes under the African system. To overcome some of these impediments, the article notes, inter-states cases may be masked as cases brought by individuals or ngo s whose interests overlap with those of States.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 462 | 345 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 26 | 19 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 74 | 51 | 3 |
Inter-State Complaints under the African Human Rights System: a Breeze of Change?
In: International Human Rights Law ReviewSearch for other papers by Frans Viljoen in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
An inter-state procedure is provided for explicitly in the 1981 African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, on which the African regional human rights system is based, but the mechanism remains underused. Exploring the question why such a small number of inter-state cases have been submitted under the Africa system, the article points to the influence of a general culture of non-intervention and a preference for non-confrontational dispute mechanisms among African States; the existence of alternative channels to resolve cases involving massive or widespread violations cases; African States have over the years placed growing confidence in the icj; the delays associated with the drc decision; and a pervasive ignorance of inter-state complaints processes under the African system. To overcome some of these impediments, the article notes, inter-states cases may be masked as cases brought by individuals or ngo s whose interests overlap with those of States.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 462 | 345 | 17 |
| Full Text Views | 26 | 19 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 74 | 51 | 3 |
