‘The Gloves Came Off’: Torture and the United States after September 11, 2001

In: International Human Rights Law Review
Parisa ZangenehSchool of Oriental and African Studies, University of London,

Search for other papers by Parisa Zangeneh in
Current site
Google Scholar
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


This article examines the use of ‘enhanced interrogation techniques’ in the context of international legal obligations under the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 1984 (CAT) and the domestic implementation of the international prohibition of torture into United States (US) law under 18 United States Code Sections 2340-2340A. The legal basis for the interrogation programme was a series of contentious legal memoranda written by Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel lawyers. This article examines whether the memo drafters ought to be investigated for incurring criminal liability for the consequences of their memoranda, namely under CAT and Sections 2340-2340A and what has unfolded under President Obama’s administration.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 195 32 0
Full Text Views 123 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 59 9 0