Save

S.A.S v France

Supporting ‘Living Together’ or Forced Assimilation?

In: International Human Rights Law Review
Author:
Hakeem Yusuf Reader in Law & Public Policy and Programme Leader, llmHuman Rights Programmes Law School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK, hakeem.yusuf@strath.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Hakeem Yusuf in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights has upheld the French law which prohibits the concealment of one’s face in public places. The law is directed principally at prohibiting Muslim women covering their faces in public spaces in France. The decision of the Strasbourg Court is premised on the French notion of ‘le vivre ensemble’; ‘living together.’ This critical analysis of the judgment contends that the decision is flawed and retrogressive for women’s rights in particular and undermines the socio-cultural rights and freedoms of individuals who belong to minority groups in general. On wider implications of the decision, it is worrisome that the decision appears to pander to dangerous political leanings currently growing in many parts of Europe and beyond. The Court risks promoting forced assimilation policies against minorities in various parts of the world. To illustrate its implications, the article highlights the experience of the Uyghurs, a Turkic ethnic group in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1738 474 28
Full Text Views 543 32 10
PDF Views & Downloads 540 82 28