Save

What’s in a Name?

Victim Naming and Blaming in Rights-Based Distinctions between Human Trafficking and Migrant Smuggling

In: International Human Rights Law Review
Author:
Marika McAdam International independent legal consultant on human trafficking, migrant smuggling and migration issues, marika_mcadam@yahoo.com.au

Search for other papers by Marika McAdam in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

This article explores the challenges involved in differentiating between human trafficking and migrant smuggling, and their implications for human rights protection. Exploitation is dismissed as a hallmark of trafficking, with reference to situations of trafficking that occur without exploitation, and migrant smuggling that involves exploitation. The consent of smuggled migrants is similarly rejected as a signifier of smuggling, given the irrelevance of consent in human trafficking. Discussion of stigmatisation of migrants willing to migrant irregularly, and the simplification of their plight, leads to consideration of rights-based distinctions between the two phenomena. Assumptions made about the types of abuses that occur in trafficking and smuggling scenarios are explained as detracting from human rights protections of rights-holders. Ultimately, it is asserted that the labels of ‘trafficked’ and ‘smuggled’ should not be determined on the basis of human rights abuses, but should be confronted irrespective of which label has been allocated.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 657 117 10
Full Text Views 160 2 0
PDF Views & Downloads 58 5 1