Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
Many endangered tropical hardwoods are commonly used in electric guitars. In order to find alternative woods, the current electric guitar woods need to be studied and classified as most research in this field has focused on acoustic instruments. Classification was done based on luthier literature, woods used in commercially available electric guitars, commercially available tonewoods and by interviewing Finnish luthiers. Here, the electric guitar woods are divided into three distinct classes based on how they are used in the guitar: low-density wood used in the body only (alder, poplar, basswood, ash), medium-density wood used in the body and neck (maple and mahogany), and high-density wood used in the fretboard only (rosewood and ebony). Together, these three classes span a wide range of anatomical and mechanical properties, but each class itself is limited to a relatively narrow parameter space. Statistically significant differences between these classes and the average hardwoods exist in the wood anatomy (size and organization of vessels, fibres, rays and axial parenchyma), in the mechanical properties (density, elastic modulus, Janka hardness, etc.) and in the average price per volume. In order to find substitute woods for a certain guitar wood class, density and elastic modulus can already be used to rule out most wood species. Based on principal component analysis of the elastomechanical and anatomical properties of commercially available hardwoods, few species are similar to the low- and high-density class woods. However, for all of the three electric guitar wood classes, non-endangered wood species are already commercially available from tonewood retailers that match the class characteristics presented here.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Alkadri A , Carlier C , Wahyudi I , Gril J , Langbour P , Brémaud I . 2017. Relationships between anatomical and vibrational properties of wavy sycamore maple. IAWA J. 39: 63–86. DOI: .
Bennett BC . 2016. The sound of trees: wood selection in guitars and other chordophones. Econ. Bot. 70: 49–63. DOI: .
Brémaud I. 2012. Acoustical properties of wood in string instruments soundboards and tuned idiophones: biological and cultural diversity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131: 807. DOI: .
Brémaud I , El Kaïm Y , Guibal D , Minato K , Thibaut B , Gril J . 2012. Characterisation and categorisation of the diversity in viscoelastic vibrational properties between 98 wood types. Ann. For. Sci. 69: 373–386. DOI: .
Carlier C , Brémaud I , Gril J . 2014. Violin making “tonewood”: Comparing makers’ empirical expertise with wood structural/visual and acoustical properties. Isma 2014: 325–330.
Dünisch O. 2017. Relationship between anatomy and vibration behaviour of softwoods and hardwoods. IAWA J. 38: 81–98. DOI: .
Endo K , Obataya E , Zeniya N , Matsuo M . 2016. Effects of heating humidity on the physical properties of hydrothermally treated spruce wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 50: 1161–1179. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: .
Forest Products Laboratory (USDA). 2010. Wood handbook–Wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-190. Madison, WI, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 508 pp.
Hamdan S , Jusoh I , Rahman MR , de Juan M . 2016. Acoustic properties of Syzygium sp., Dialium sp., Gymnostoma sp., and Sindora sp. wood. BioResources 11: 5941–5948. DOI: .
Hunter D. 2006. The electric guitar sourcebook: How to find the sounds you like. Ed. 1. Backbeat Books.
IAWA Committee. 1989. IAWA List of microscopic features for hardwood identification. IAWA Bull. n. s. 10: 219–332.
InsideWood. 2004-onwards. Published on the internet. http://insidewood.lib.ncsu.edu/search. Accessed December 1, 2017.
IUCN. 2017. IUCN Red List of threatened species. Version 2017.2. www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed February 1, 2018.
Johnson A , Laestadius L . 2011. New laws, new needs: The role of wood science in global policy efforts to reduce illegal logging and associated trade. IAWA J. 32: 125–136. DOI: .
Kattge J , Díaz S , Lavorel S , Prentice IC , Leadley P , Bönisch G , Garnier E , et al.2011. TRY – a global database of plant traits. Global Change Biol. 17(9): 2905–2935. DOI: .
Koch M. 2001. Building electric guitars: how to make solid-body, hollow-body and semi-acoustic electric guitars and bass guitars. Ed. 2. Koch Verlag, Austria.
Lospennato L. 2015. Electric guitar & bass making & markerting. Ed. 1. Tango & Blum.
Martinez-Reyes J. 2015. Mahogany intertwined: enviromateriality between Mexico, Fiji, and the Gibson Les Paul. J. Mat. Cult. 20: 313–329. DOI: .
Meier E. 2015. WOOD ! Identifying and using hundreds of woods worldwide. The Wood Database.
Meier E . 2017. “The Wood Database” http://www.wood-database.com/. Accessed December 1, 2017.
Minato K , Konaka Y , Brémaud I , Suzuki S , Obataya E . 2010. Extractives of Muirapiranga (Brosimun sp.) and its effects on the vibrational properties of wood. J. Wood Sci. 56 : 41–46. DOI: .
Ncube E , Masilinga P . 2017. Prospective Zambian tonewoods for dreadnought acoustic guitar. Int. Wood Products J. 8: 216–226. DOI: .
Neyses B , Sandberg D . 2015. A new methodology to select hardwood species for wooden products. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 10: 344–352. DOI: .
Noguchi T , Obataya E , Ando K . 2012. Effects of aging on the vibrational properties of wood. J. Cult. Herit. 13: S21–25. DOI: .
Obataya E. 2017. Effects of natural and artificial ageing on the physical and acoustic properties of wood in musical instruments. J. Cult. Herit. 27: S63–69. DOI:
Paté A , Le Carrou J-L , Fabre B . 2013. Ebony vs. rosewood: experimental investigation about the influence of the fingerboard on the sound of a solid body electric guitar. Proc. SMAC, June 2016: 4–9.
Paté A , Le Carrou J-L , Navarret B , Dubois D , Fabre B . 2015. Influence of the electric guitar’s fingerboard wood on guitarists’ perception. Acta Acust. United Ac. 101: 347–359. DOI: .
Schwarze FWMR , Spycher M , Fink S . 2008. Superior wood for violins – wood decay fungi as a substitute for cold climate. New Phytol. 179: 1095–1104. DOI: .
Sproßmann R , Zauer M , Wagenführ A . 2017. Characterization of acoustic and mechanical properties of common tropical woods used in classical guitars. Results Phys. 7: 1737–1742. DOI: .
Wegst UGK . 2006. Wood for sound. Am. J. Bot. 93: 1439–1448. DOI: .
Wheeler EA . 2011. InsideWood – A web resource for hardwood anatomy. IAWA J. 32 : 199–211. DOI: .
Yano H , Minato K . 1992. Improvement of the acoustic and hygroscopic properties of wood by a chemical treatment and application to the violin parts. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92: 1222–1227. DOI: .
Yoshikawa S. 2007. Acoustical classification of woods for string instruments. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122: 568–573. DOI: .
Yoshikawa S , Waltham C . 2014. Woods for wooden musical instruments. ISMA 2014. DOI:.
Zauer M , Kowalewski A , Sproßmann R , Stonjek H , Wagenführ A . 2016. Thermal modification of European beech at relatively mild temperatures for the use in electric bass guitars. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 74: 43–48. DOI: .
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2664 | 812 | 67 |
Full Text Views | 148 | 27 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 169 | 54 | 1 |
Many endangered tropical hardwoods are commonly used in electric guitars. In order to find alternative woods, the current electric guitar woods need to be studied and classified as most research in this field has focused on acoustic instruments. Classification was done based on luthier literature, woods used in commercially available electric guitars, commercially available tonewoods and by interviewing Finnish luthiers. Here, the electric guitar woods are divided into three distinct classes based on how they are used in the guitar: low-density wood used in the body only (alder, poplar, basswood, ash), medium-density wood used in the body and neck (maple and mahogany), and high-density wood used in the fretboard only (rosewood and ebony). Together, these three classes span a wide range of anatomical and mechanical properties, but each class itself is limited to a relatively narrow parameter space. Statistically significant differences between these classes and the average hardwoods exist in the wood anatomy (size and organization of vessels, fibres, rays and axial parenchyma), in the mechanical properties (density, elastic modulus, Janka hardness, etc.) and in the average price per volume. In order to find substitute woods for a certain guitar wood class, density and elastic modulus can already be used to rule out most wood species. Based on principal component analysis of the elastomechanical and anatomical properties of commercially available hardwoods, few species are similar to the low- and high-density class woods. However, for all of the three electric guitar wood classes, non-endangered wood species are already commercially available from tonewood retailers that match the class characteristics presented here.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2664 | 812 | 67 |
Full Text Views | 148 | 27 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 169 | 54 | 1 |