Save

Justice is Interventionist: The Political Sources of the Judicial Reach of the Special Court for Sierra Leone

In: International Criminal Law Review
Author:
Kenneth A. Rodman Colby College, Waterville, ME, USA

Search for other papers by Kenneth A. Rodman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

The Special Court for Sierra Leone’s conviction of former Liberian President Charles Taylor and its prosecution of perpetrators regardless of their political alignment have been hailed as milestones in the diffusion of international criminal justice norms. Yet what made these achievements possible were interventionist strategies by Western governments and international and regional institutions to defeat the rebellion in Sierra Leone and bring about regime change in Liberia. The broader lesson that should be drawn from this is that the prospects for prosecution in the aftermath of armed conflict are likely to be determined by the political strategies adopted by the international community to end the violence and that international criminal justice presumes an interventionist form of politics.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 258 55 22
Full Text Views 141 10 1
PDF Views & Downloads 56 8 3