This article revives Judith N. Shklar’s Legalism (Harvard University Press, 1964) with an eye to its relevance to international criminal law today. It examines her general jurisprudential outlook, and critique of various prominent mid-century positions, before turning to her account of the Nuremberg Trials. Showing that her defense of those trials may fail, the article concludes by suggesting that the book’s failure may make it more relevant to the contemporary enterprise of international criminal law rather than less.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 951 | 91 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 332 | 34 | 6 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 269 | 67 | 14 |
This article revives Judith N. Shklar’s Legalism (Harvard University Press, 1964) with an eye to its relevance to international criminal law today. It examines her general jurisprudential outlook, and critique of various prominent mid-century positions, before turning to her account of the Nuremberg Trials. Showing that her defense of those trials may fail, the article concludes by suggesting that the book’s failure may make it more relevant to the contemporary enterprise of international criminal law rather than less.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 951 | 91 | 4 |
Full Text Views | 332 | 34 | 6 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 269 | 67 | 14 |