Responsibility, Authority, and the Community of Moral Agents in Domestic and International Criminal Law

in International Criminal Law Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Antony Duff argues that the criminal law’s characteristic function is to hold people responsible. It only has the authority to do this when the person who is called to account, and those who call her to account, share some prior relationship. In systems of domestic criminal law, this relationship is co-citizenship. The polity is the relevant community. In international criminal law, the relevant community is simply the moral community of humanity. I am sympathetic to his community-based analysis, but argue that the moral community must play a greater role in the domestic case and that the collection of individual political communities must play a greater role in the international case.

Sections

References

5

Duff, supra note 2, p. 595.

6

Duff, supra note 1, p. 126.

16

Duff, supra note 2, p. 593.

26

Strawson, supra note 3, p. 32.

30

Duff, supra note 2., p. 596.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 3
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0