Amnesty, Revenge, and the Threat of Conflict Relapse

in International Criminal Law Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Recent decades have witnessed an increase in internal armed conflicts, resulting in significant consequences for affected civilian populations. At the same time, there has been rapid growth in international criminal law and a trend towards accountability. Yet, attempts to mitigate violence may come at the cost of accountability, leading to the commonly referenced to peace-versus-justice dispute. Blanket amnesties are one tool for conflict mitigation, bargaining chips that allow actors to come to the negotiating table. This article examines issues related to blanket amnesties that are absent from the amnesty versus accountability debate. The basis of the analysis is not whether accountability reduces a victim’s desire for revenge. Instead, the analysis examines whether amnesty increases a victim’s desire for revenge, and when combined with other socio-political factors that contribute to conflict relapse, finds that this increased desire may escalate the potential for renewed violence in post-conflict regions.

Amnesty, Revenge, and the Threat of Conflict Relapse

in International Criminal Law Review

Sections

References

7

For example‘when [a] government is obliged to use military force against the insurgents, instead of mere police forces.’ Ibid; however the US considers its war against Al-Queda to be a NIAC. See International Committee of the Red Cross How is the Term ‘Armed Conflict’ Defined in International Law? Opinion Paper (March 2008) <www.icrc.org/eng/assets/files/other/opinion-paper-armed-conflict.pdf> (accessed 27 Dec 2013).

11

Kellersupra note 8.

14

Kellersupra note 8.

22

Broomhallsupra note 4 p. 93; Juan Mendez ‘National Reconciliation Transitional Justice and the International Criminal Court’ 15 Ethics and International Affairs (May 2001) 27.

29

Smithsupra note 27.

38

Naqvisupra note 36.

50

OECDsupra note 47.

53

Orthsupra note 46 p. 62.

58

Colliersupra note 31 p. 17.

63

Doreen Carvajal‘Hunting for Liberia’s Missing Millions’The New York Times30 May 2011.

66

Colliersupra note 31 p. 55.

67

Sensupra note 65 p. 144.

70

Orthsupra note 46 pp. 62–63.

77

Motives for Genocidesupra note 43.

78

Volkansupra note 76.

84

Colliersupra note 31 p. 69.

90

Telegraphsupra note 87.

93

Quiadessupra note 88 p. 4.

96

On 2 February 2012Syrian opposition groups organised massive demonstrations to commemorate the thirtieth anniversary of the Hama massacre; AlJazeera Syrian Activist Commemorate Hama Atrocities (last modified 2 Feb. 2012) available at <www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2012/02/2012221439757981.html> (accessed 30 December 2013).

97

Vidmasupra note 39 p. 307.

99

O’Connellsupra note 52 pp. 303–304.

100

Vidmasupra note 39 p. 36.

101

O’Connellsupra note 52 p. 310.

103

O’Connellsupra note 52 p. 319.

110

Chirotsupra note 43.

111

Center on Law and Globalizationsupra note 43.

112

Volkansupra note 76.

120

Vulkansupra note 110 p. 125.

121

Sternbergsupra note 86 p. 42.

130

O’Connellsupra note 52 pp. 295 298–299.

131

Mendeloffsupra note 34 p. 615.

132

Lambournesupra note 13.

134

Mendeloffsupra note 34.

135

O’Connellsupra note 52 p. 327.

137

O’Connellsupra note 52 p. 318.

138

Lambournesupra note 13 p. 7.

139

IDEAsupra note 35 p. 12.

143

IDEAsupra note 35 pp. 21–22.

145

Mendezsupra note 23 p. 26.

148

IDEAsupra note 35 p. 38.

151

Genocide Watchsupra note 146.

152

Mendezsupra note 23.

153

IDEAsupra note 35 at 26.

154

Kelmansupra note 137.

155

IDEAsupra note 35 p. 26.

157

Mendezsupra note 23 at 32; see Chirot supra note 43 p. 2.

158

Mendezsupra note 23 at 32.

159

Smithsupra note 27 p. 216. (Smith notes the ICTY started proceedings before the Balkan conflicts finished).

163

Kourabassupra note 25 p. 60. For example during the preparatory commission for the establishment of the ICC Sudan opposed ‘the inclusion of crimes dealt with under the four Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocols I and II’ as War Crimes as that ‘might undermine measures adopted by States to establish peace in non-international conflicts and hamper efforts towards amnesty and national or domestic reconciliation.’ over war crimes because it would ‘undermine measures adopted by States to establish peace in non-international conflicts and hamper efforts towards amnesty and national or domestic reconciliation.’ UN Diplomatic Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court Rome 15 June -17 July 1998. (A/CONF.183/13 (Vol. II)) pg. 168. para. 101; The US argued that a grant of amnesty is a decision made by a diplomatic government and the prosecutor should take such amnesty into consideration. Kate Allan ‘Prosecution and Peace: A Role for Amnesty before the ICC?’ 39 Denv J. Int’L Poly (2010–2011) 248.

164

Kourabassupra note 25.

165

Rome Statutesupra note 2 at 53(c).

166

Kourabassupra note 25 at 61.

169

Kourabassupra note 25 p. 61.

171

Cryersupra note 168.

176

Mendeloffsupra note 34 p. 596.

179

Rigbysupra note 175.

180

Manisupra note 1 p. 25.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 6
Full Text Views 11 11 11
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0