Save

Ethnic Cleansing as Genocide – Assessing the Croatian Genocide Case before the icj

In: International Criminal Law Review
Author:
Maja Munivrana Vajda Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Croatia

Search for other papers by Maja Munivrana Vajda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

This article considers whether and if so, under what conditions, the practice of forced population transfer can be regarded a form of genocide, notwithstanding its formal exclusion from the Genocide Convention. This is particularly relevant in the context of the pending genocide case before the International Court of Justice between Croatia and Serbia since both states essentially base their claims on acts of ethnic cleansing. International case law on this matter is far from clear, yet it points to the conclusion that ethnic cleansing may rise to genocide when carried out with genocidal intent. In contrast, Croatian courts seem to have simply equated the intent to ethnically clean a given area with the intent to destroy. Following a brief overview of Croatian case law, this article considers the viability of the pending genocide allegations and whether the Croatian claim and Serbian counter-claim have any prospects of success.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1800 127 9
Full Text Views 325 13 1
PDF Views & Downloads 263 38 2