The ‘Inherent Power’ of Judges: An Ethical Yardstick to Assess Prosecutorial Conduct at the icc

in International Criminal Law Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Although the Code of Conduct for the Office of the Prosecutor (otp) of the International Criminal Court (icc) that entered into force in 2013 unquestionably provided a more comprehensive set of ethical standards for all members of the Office (both staff members and elected officials), it does not fully meet the current needs to balance the powers and faculties of the Prosecutor in compliance with fair trial principles, the credibility of the Court and the sound administration of justice. Notwithstanding the adoption of the Code, a controversial prosecutorial action in the Bemba et al. case led to a request to disqualify the entire staff of the otp. This paper takes the opportunity to remark on the ethical standards applicable to icc prosecution lawyers and specifically the role of icc judges as the ‘ultimate guardian of a fair and expeditious trial’ in outlining the criteria to assess the conduct, good standing and professionalism of the otp.

The ‘Inherent Power’ of Judges: An Ethical Yardstick to Assess Prosecutorial Conduct at the icc

in International Criminal Law Review

Sections

References

33

Markovicsupra note 9 p. 207.

38

Counsel Matterssupra note 16 passim.

43

Counsel Matterssupra note 16.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 21 21 4
Full Text Views 98 98 59
PDF Downloads 7 7 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0