Defence Counsel Ethics, the icc Code of Conduct and Establishing a Bar Association for icc List Counsel

in International Criminal Law Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Defence counsel are ethically bound to zealously represent their clients. So what exactly does it mean to ‘zealously represent’ a client before any of the international criminal courts or tribunals? How unproblematic is it for defence counsel to meet their ethical duties? Would an International Criminal Court (icc) Bar or professional association for icc List Counsel and their assistants be of any significance to that end? This contribution concludes that the only way forward out of the prevailing and persistent morass List Counsel currently find themselves in at the icc, is through the establishment of a Bar Association for List Counsel and their assistants.

Defence Counsel Ethics, the icc Code of Conduct and Establishing a Bar Association for icc List Counsel

in International Criminal Law Review

Sections

References

6

H. Morrison‘Experimental Justice: Do International Tribunals Work?’36 Bedford Row London; Recorder of the Crown Courtonline at www.old.leginet.eu/articles_en.php?PHPSESSI=4c5jiep1tgt5b97ohc6rg6bbl5 accessed 20 September 2016.

61

Freedman‘Professional Responsibility’supra note 52 n. 1.

62

Freedman‘Getting Honest’supra note 52 p. 137.

63

Freedman‘Professional Responsibility’supra note 53 p. 1469.

81

Freedman‘Henry Lord Brougham’supra note 80 p. 1215.

82

D. Hoffman‘Fifty Resolutions in Regard to Professional Deportment’ in A Course of Legal Study Addressed to Students and the Profession GenerallyVol. ii (William S. Hein & Co. Baltimore 1836) Resolution 33 as cited in Zacharias and Green supra note 78 p. 3.

83

Zacharias and Greensupra note 78 pp. 2–3.

86

Zacharias and Greensupra note 78 p. 3.

91

Zacharias and Greensupra note 78 p. 6.

95

Tuinstrasupra note 2 p. 5.

103

Tuinstrasupra note 2 p. 147.

106

Turnersupra note 13 p. 685.

126

Turnersupra note 13 p. 688 explaining that international courts serve goals beyond that of determining guilt or innocence according to fair procedures and therefore it is sensible to adjust ethical guidance accordingly.

129

Turnersupra note 13 p. 713.

131

Turnersupra note 13 p. 697.

135

Tuinstrasupra note 2 p. 200: “Generally the concept of being an officer of the court is difficult to understand for lawyers from civil law systems. They consider this to impinge on their independence” referring to Nagorcka et al.supra note 53 p. 449. She does note that this term has been used in cases from the European Court of Human Rights citing Nikula v. Finland App. No. 31611/96 21 March 2002 para. 45; Steur v. The Netherlands App. No. 39657/98 28 October 2003 paras. 36 38.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 39 39 28
Full Text Views 10 10 10
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0