In 2016 the European Union (eu) introduced a Passenger Name Record Data (pnr) Directive. There has been controversy in the eu over the acquisition and sharing of pnr data, related mainly to the lack of safeguards and protection of personal data protection. This article examines these issues related to earlier eu pnr agreements with third countries and why previous eu attempts to legislate in this area failed. By drawing a comparison with the 2011 pnr Directive proposal, the article argues that by meeting the strict eu law on data protection as well as being necessary to assist in preventing and detecting acts of terrorism and serious crime it is submitted the 2016 Directive is fit for purpose and able to withstand scrutiny by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
European Commission (2011) ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the use of Passenger Name Record data for the prevention detection investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime’ com(2011) 32 final online at <http://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/news/intro/docs/com_2011_32_en.pdf> 5 May 2016.
C. Phipps and K. Rawlinson‘Paris attacks kill more than 120 people – as it happened’The Guardian14 November 2015 online at <https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2015/nov/13/shootings-reported-in-eastern-paris-live> 4 March 2016.
A. Chrisafis‘France train attack: Americans overpower gunman on Paris express’The Guardian22 August 2015 online at <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/aug/21/amsterdam-paris-train-gunman-france> 4 March 2016.