Save

The Office of the Prosecutor: Seeking Justice or Serving Global Imperialism?

In: International Criminal Law Review
Author:
Shannon Fyfe Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Philosophy Department, George Mason University; Fellow, Institute for Philosophy and Public Policy, Fairfax, va, USA, sfyfe2@gmu.edu

Search for other papers by Shannon Fyfe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

The international criminal courts and tribunals, especially the icc, have been strongly criticized for their susceptibility to political influence. Some have argued that the icc has a distinctly Western bias and is participating in a new kind of imperialism in Africa. Others argue that history and the complicity of the West should disqualify the international community from demanding the prosecution of individuals participating in conflicts resulting directly from colonialism. Many have focused on the nature of the creation of the judicial bodies and the inherent political nature of judicial decisions regarding whom to prosecute. In this article, I offer a normative defense of the icc, in which I acknowledge the icc’s structural protections against impermissible political influence, along with the vulnerabilities of the Chief Prosecutor to claims of distributive and substantive injustice.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 879 170 22
Full Text Views 237 18 1
PDF Views & Downloads 382 47 2