Save

Athena’s Vote: Imperial Proceedings and the Hegemonic Origins of International Criminal Law in Aeschylus’ Eumenides

In: International Criminal Law Review
Author:
Emiliano J. Buis Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Avenida Figueroa Alcorta 2263, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, C1425, Argentina

Search for other papers by Emiliano J. Buis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€43.34€34.95 excl. VAT

Abstract

In this paper, the author gives an account of the final trial scene in Aeschylus’ Eumenides, which in his opinion could be described as a subtle literary representation of the imperial justification of the exercise of criminal legal power over foreigners in classical Athens. Based on a philosophical exploration of the importance of criminal pollution and the need to create a new tribunal—the Areopagus—to institutionally overcome its dreadful consequences, it is contended that Aeschylean drama provides us with an aesthetic justification in antiquity for the creation (and imposition) of courts concerned with international offences which were considered to be extremely serious and dangerous for Athenian interests.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 438 85 14
Full Text Views 137 62 0
PDF Views & Downloads 295 126 3