Save

International Criminal Tribunals as Triggers of Institutional Change? Evidence from Ad Hoc Tribunals and the icc’s Referral and Proprio Motu Cases

In: International Criminal Law Review
Authors:
Klaus Bachmann SPWS University, Chodakowska 19/31, 03-815 Warsaw, Poland

Search for other papers by Klaus Bachmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gerhard Kemp UWE Bristol Law School, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, United Kingdom

Search for other papers by Gerhard Kemp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Irena Ristić Institute of Social Sciences (Institut društvenih nauka), Kraljice Natalije 45, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Search for other papers by Irena Ristić in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jovana Mihajlović Trbovc Institute of Culture and Memory Studies, Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts (ZRC SAZU), Novi trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia

Search for other papers by Jovana Mihajlović Trbovc in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christian Nsabimana Garuka KK 241 ST 18 Kigali, Rwanda

Search for other papers by Christian Nsabimana Garuka in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Amani Ejami Al Wasl Street Flat 112, Al Mur Residence, Jumairah1, Dubai, UAE

Search for other papers by Amani Ejami in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Vjeran Pavlaković Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Rijeka, Sveučilišna Av 4, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia

Search for other papers by Vjeran Pavlaković in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

The current article examines whether international criminal tribunals (ict) can be regarded as actors of international relations, which trigger domestic policy changes in countries under their jurisdiction. Drawing on the concepts of ‘third party enforcement’ and ‘credible commitment’ theory, the study examines ict cases during which an ict carried out investigations and prosecutions against the will of the respective sitting government. Based on field research from seven states and three tribunals, the authors present some counterintuitive conclusions. Limited institutional reforms did take place; they can at least partly be attributed to ict decisions and they proved more sustainable in autocratic states than in some democratic ones. Independence from the organizations and states which created the tribunals does not always help tribunals to carry out their mission; it rather strengthens their actorness and influence if they enjoy their founders’ strong support but keep distance to the countries in which they investigate.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 209 209 15
Full Text Views 9 9 3
PDF Views & Downloads 22 22 4