Ainu Landowners’ Struggle for Justice and the Illegitimacy of the Nibutani Dam Project in Hokkaido Japan

in International Community Law Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

In 2008 the Ainu were officially recognized as an indigenous people by the Japanese Government. The recognition arose from the 1997 court’s decision on the Nibutani Dam case which concluded, for the first time in Japanese history, that the Ainu people have the right to enjoy their own culture and that they fit the definition of indigenous people. The plaintiffs were Ainu landowners from the Nibutani Community who claimed the revocation of the expropriation decision. However, the Nibutani Dam was completed before the court’s decision, with the court acknowledging the completion as fait accompli on the grounds that the revocation of the expropriation decision would not be in the public’s interest. This article reveals the flawed legal system in the decision making process for public works as well as a brief history and some cultural background of the Ainu through those plaintiffs’ struggle for justice. Further, the illegitimacy of the Nibutani Dam project is discussed in light of publicness based on the complaint of those plaintiffs, and lastly, publicness of public works is explored in the context of studies on publicness in Japan.

Ainu Landowners’ Struggle for Justice and the Illegitimacy of the Nibutani Dam Project in Hokkaido Japan

in International Community Law Review

Sections

References

28)

Takeshisupra note 25 at 8.

32)

Tanakasupra note 13 at 61–62.

34)

Japan Broadcasting Corporationsupra note 22.

42)

Levinsupra note 3 at 466.

45)

Kaizawasupra note 37 at 483–490.

46)

25 26 August 1975 and 5 6 August 1981.

50)

Tanakasupra note 32 at 77.

51)

Biratori Cho (Town)supra note 19 at 1425.

54)

Japan Broadcasting Corporationsupra note 22.

56)

Miyamotosupra note 7 at 63.

59)

Miyamotosupra note 7 at 72.

66)

Elina Helander-RenvallUN Biological Diversity in the Arctic Final Report: September 2005 p. 4.

68)

Elina Helander-Renvall“Development, Knowledge and Sami Reindeer Herding”Cultural and Social Research in Greenland 95/96 Essays in Honour of Robert Petersen (1996) p. 107.

69)

Miyamotosupra note 7 at 84.

71)

Helaner-Renvallsupra note 68 at 112.

72)

Daessupra note 70 at 67.

73)

Japan Broadcasting Corporationsupra note 22.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 13 13 8
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0