In the judgment delivered in the case concerning Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy), the International Court of Justice held that under the present state of international customary law State immunity encompasses all acta jure imperii, regardless of whether they are unlawful. Following the ruling that States are entitled to jurisdictional immunities before foreign courts even if their sovereign acts amount to violations of peremptory norms, the Court found that Italy had violated Germany’s immunity from jurisdiction and enforcement. In rendering such a conservative judgment, the Court missed a double opportunity: to contribute to the development of international law by interpreting the rule on sovereign immunity in harmony with international human rights law and its dynamics, and to finally serve justice for the victims of war crimes.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Pislillo Mazzeschi, supra note 1, at 314.
Ibid., p. 33, para. 77.
Ibid., pp. 33–34, paras. 78–79.
Trapp and Mills, supra note 1, at 158. See also Riccardo Pavoni, “An American Anomaly? On the icj’s Selective Reading of United States Practice in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State”, 21 Italian Yearbook of International Law (2011) pp. 143–159.
Ibid., p. 39, para. 97.
See Trapp and Mills, supra note 1, at 159.
Ibid., p. 41, para. 101.
Ibid., p. 40, para. 99.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 426 | 77 | 14 |
Full Text Views | 258 | 9 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 103 | 16 | 1 |
In the judgment delivered in the case concerning Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. Italy), the International Court of Justice held that under the present state of international customary law State immunity encompasses all acta jure imperii, regardless of whether they are unlawful. Following the ruling that States are entitled to jurisdictional immunities before foreign courts even if their sovereign acts amount to violations of peremptory norms, the Court found that Italy had violated Germany’s immunity from jurisdiction and enforcement. In rendering such a conservative judgment, the Court missed a double opportunity: to contribute to the development of international law by interpreting the rule on sovereign immunity in harmony with international human rights law and its dynamics, and to finally serve justice for the victims of war crimes.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 426 | 77 | 14 |
Full Text Views | 258 | 9 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 103 | 16 | 1 |