Fiat iustitia . . . Professor Krzysztof Skubiszewski and His Vision of the Relations Between the International Court of Justice and the Security Council

in International Community Law Review
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The present article addresses the legacy of the late Professor Krzysztof Skubiszewski with a view to analysing his vision of the judicial function of the International Court of Justice vis-à-vis the Security Council. Although the issue has attracted much scholarly and practical attention, it may be argued that the position taken by Skubiszewski, successfully combining theory with practice, remains highly relevant despite the lapse of time and subsequent developments. The relations between the two main organs of the United Nations are examined particularly in the light of the latest jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice.

Sections

References

10

Ibid., pp. 151–2.

13

See, e.g., Manfred Lachs, “La Cour Internationale de Justice, Organe Judiciaire Principal des Nations Unies” in Liber Amicorum Adolf F. Schnitzer offert à l’occasion de son 90e anniversaire le 30 juillet 1979 par la Faculté de Droit de l’Université de Geneve (1979) p. 281.

14

Gross, supra note 12, p. 320.

20

See Mohammed Bedjaoui, “Les relations entre la Cour internationale de justice et les autres organes principaux des Nations unies: pour des rapports de seconde generation”, in Boutros Boutros-Ghali amicorum discipulorumque liber: Paix, développement, démocratie, Vol. 1 (1998) pp. 180f.

22

Ibid., p. 491.

30

Skubiszewski, supra note 1, p. 612.

31

See Resolution 9(1946) of 15 October 1946.

39

Elsen, supra note 36, p. 63.

40

Ibid., p. 53.

50

Francis Vallat, “The Peaceful Settlement of Disputes”, in Cambridge Essays in International Law, Essays in Honour of Lord McNair (1965) p. 177.

56

Ibid., p. 862.

61

Ibid., I.C.J. Reports 1971, p. 44 (§ 89).

63

Pellet, supra note 12, p. 123.

65

Skubiszewski, supra note 1, p. 623.

70

Ibid., Dissenting Opinion by Judge ad hoc El-Kosheri, I.C.J. Reports 1992, pp. 210 ff. (§§ 33ff).

77

Skubiszewski, supra note 1, p. 620.

78

Ibid., p. 618.

82

Skubiszewski, supra note 1, p. 628.

90

Ibid., I.C.J. Reports 2010, p. 422 (§46).

92

Skubiszewski, supra note 1, p. 626.

98

In particular see Skubiszewski, supra note 1, pp. 626f.

101

Skubiszewski, supra note 1, p. 627.

102

Ibid., p. 629.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 9 9 4
Full Text Views 3 3 3
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0